BRYY_MILLER
member since 01/20/2011 |
last login 06/19/2011
A playwright that dabbes in independent filmmaking from time to time. Writing is fun....
Bio
A playwright that dabbes in independent filmmaking from time to time. Writing is fun.
Submissions by BRYY_MILLER
No submissions (yet)
Reviews by BRYY_MILLER 64
-
A review of The Real World: Salemby BRYY_MILLER on 04/26/2011Center your title. Also, no "A parody by". Either "by", or "written by". The dialogue is clever, witty, and feels real. You actually made characters and plots, where others would just do "haha The Real World haha" (I've read a load of these types of plays before). But worse is that they never treat it as a play; they adopt the television format for the stage. This, sir or... Center your title. Also, no "A parody by". Either "by", or "written by".
The dialogue is clever, witty, and feels real. You actually made characters and plots, where others would just do "haha The Real World haha" (I've read a load of these types of plays before). But worse is that they never treat it as a play; they adopt the television format for the stage. This, sir or madam, is a play. Full of real characters saying real things. Full of substance. Which is why it can't be MTV. It can possibly still be "The Real World", but it can't be MTV. That is too close to reality.
Fitch is a fantastic character. When I was reading their words, I thought of Sigorney Weaver from "The TV Set" (which might benefit you to watch, the ending alone is brilliant). Make sure your director knows how to make these characters fluid and real, and not charicatures. That's what you have to watch out for with Fitch.
"See that you do. Now go away." < Great line.
Wendy's monologues seem dull and the play stops when I come across them. I understand them, but maybe find a way to sprinkle that throughout the piece.
Wendy, in general, is a delightful character. She wants to do the right thing, wants to keep her job, wants to make everyone happy. She's sane, but at the same time, as insane as Fitch.
The Salem reveal is great.
Betty Sue's transformation is solid. Gold.
I love how you basically hit on all the Real World archetypes and events, without really taking away from the atmosphere of this BEING A PLAY.
But if you are going to have two acts, you need to close one off with a bang and open the next with a bang that is a direct continuation of that bang. If you ask me, you should make the "ratings are down" scene the act one ender, and make it more poignant. Raise the stakes. We know about ratings, what about the people?
The act three intro is amazing. It's what act 1/2 needs to be. Although, I have said I love the Betty Sue arc, and I love how it has escalated to Chad and her married, and Chad being totally whipped.
"Let’s move on before everyone realizes I have
absolutely nothing interesting to say ever." < Great line, but once again, having it actually be Carson Daly is pushing it.
I love how EVERYONE comically hates Patricia to the point of ridiculousness.
Sam being the killer makes so much sense. Once you hear how she did it, everything clicks. read -
A review of Napoleon and Josephine at Breakfastby BRYY_MILLER on 03/30/2011First off, don't start numbering until the actual text. If the characters are not speaking, and yet an action is taking place, that is a stage direction. It also may do good to have a bit of introductory dialogue before you get into the monologues of "New Caesar" and such. Remember, WE don't know what is going on. We don't know they are dead. We know nothing. This looks... First off, don't start numbering until the actual text.
If the characters are not speaking, and yet an action is taking place, that is a stage direction.
It also may do good to have a bit of introductory dialogue before you get into the monologues of "New Caesar" and such. Remember, WE don't know what is going on. We don't know they are dead. We know nothing.
This looks like it was done in MS Word. You will want to invest in an actual screenwriting software. I know this is a play, but Final Draft has many, many templates to choose from. read -
A review of WONAby BRYY_MILLER on 03/29/2011The play really didn't make any sense. I understand that it is existentialism, but it just seems like BAD existentialism. The kind that says "this is a metaphor, go with it". Yes, while things DO just happen in existentialist pieces, nothing "just happens": the purpose needs to be clear, and not at the level of a cerebral in-joke. The scenes go by way too fast. We can't catch... The play really didn't make any sense. I understand that it is existentialism, but it just seems like BAD existentialism. The kind that says "this is a metaphor, go with it". Yes, while things DO just happen in existentialist pieces, nothing "just happens": the purpose needs to be clear, and not at the level of a cerebral in-joke.
The scenes go by way too fast. We can't catch our breath. There is no purpose to the scenes, no middle or ends. They feel incomplete.
FORMAT:
* While your synopsis of the play is descriptive and does help, it is also overly-descriptive. The actors, the director, the crew - they must be trusted. This feels like you want to do it all for them, that they have to do it "right". Let everyone play. read
Write a Comment
Submissions by BRYY_MILLER
No submissions (yet)
Reviews by BRYY_MILLER 64
-
A review of The Real World: Salemby BRYY_MILLER on 04/26/2011Center your title. Also, no "A parody by". Either "by", or "written by". The dialogue is clever, witty, and feels real. You actually made characters and plots, where others would just do "haha The Real World haha" (I've read a load of these types of plays before). But worse is that they never treat it as a play; they adopt the television format for the stage. This, sir or... Center your title. Also, no "A parody by". Either "by", or "written by".
The dialogue is clever, witty, and feels real. You actually made characters and plots, where others would just do "haha The Real World haha" (I've read a load of these types of plays before). But worse is that they never treat it as a play; they adopt the television format for the stage. This, sir or madam, is a play. Full of real characters saying real things. Full of substance. Which is why it can't be MTV. It can possibly still be "The Real World", but it can't be MTV. That is too close to reality.
Fitch is a fantastic character. When I was reading their words, I thought of Sigorney Weaver from "The TV Set" (which might benefit you to watch, the ending alone is brilliant). Make sure your director knows how to make these characters fluid and real, and not charicatures. That's what you have to watch out for with Fitch.
"See that you do. Now go away." < Great line.
Wendy's monologues seem dull and the play stops when I come across them. I understand them, but maybe find a way to sprinkle that throughout the piece.
Wendy, in general, is a delightful character. She wants to do the right thing, wants to keep her job, wants to make everyone happy. She's sane, but at the same time, as insane as Fitch.
The Salem reveal is great.
Betty Sue's transformation is solid. Gold.
I love how you basically hit on all the Real World archetypes and events, without really taking away from the atmosphere of this BEING A PLAY.
But if you are going to have two acts, you need to close one off with a bang and open the next with a bang that is a direct continuation of that bang. If you ask me, you should make the "ratings are down" scene the act one ender, and make it more poignant. Raise the stakes. We know about ratings, what about the people?
The act three intro is amazing. It's what act 1/2 needs to be. Although, I have said I love the Betty Sue arc, and I love how it has escalated to Chad and her married, and Chad being totally whipped.
"Let’s move on before everyone realizes I have
absolutely nothing interesting to say ever." < Great line, but once again, having it actually be Carson Daly is pushing it.
I love how EVERYONE comically hates Patricia to the point of ridiculousness.
Sam being the killer makes so much sense. Once you hear how she did it, everything clicks. read -
A review of Napoleon and Josephine at Breakfastby BRYY_MILLER on 03/30/2011First off, don't start numbering until the actual text. If the characters are not speaking, and yet an action is taking place, that is a stage direction. It also may do good to have a bit of introductory dialogue before you get into the monologues of "New Caesar" and such. Remember, WE don't know what is going on. We don't know they are dead. We know nothing. This looks... First off, don't start numbering until the actual text.
If the characters are not speaking, and yet an action is taking place, that is a stage direction.
It also may do good to have a bit of introductory dialogue before you get into the monologues of "New Caesar" and such. Remember, WE don't know what is going on. We don't know they are dead. We know nothing.
This looks like it was done in MS Word. You will want to invest in an actual screenwriting software. I know this is a play, but Final Draft has many, many templates to choose from. read -
A review of WONAby BRYY_MILLER on 03/29/2011The play really didn't make any sense. I understand that it is existentialism, but it just seems like BAD existentialism. The kind that says "this is a metaphor, go with it". Yes, while things DO just happen in existentialist pieces, nothing "just happens": the purpose needs to be clear, and not at the level of a cerebral in-joke. The scenes go by way too fast. We can't catch... The play really didn't make any sense. I understand that it is existentialism, but it just seems like BAD existentialism. The kind that says "this is a metaphor, go with it". Yes, while things DO just happen in existentialist pieces, nothing "just happens": the purpose needs to be clear, and not at the level of a cerebral in-joke.
The scenes go by way too fast. We can't catch our breath. There is no purpose to the scenes, no middle or ends. They feel incomplete.
FORMAT:
* While your synopsis of the play is descriptive and does help, it is also overly-descriptive. The actors, the director, the crew - they must be trusted. This feels like you want to do it all for them, that they have to do it "right". Let everyone play. read -
A review of Trouble In Helenvilleby BRYY_MILLER on 03/29/2011For a political piece, this seemed to waver between not wanting to get "into it" (by having only a few characters) and wanting to dive right in (GW Bush's trial). I think you need to figure out exactly what the root of the play is. The tit-for-tat between Lisimba and Helen seems to be the real meat here, their power struggle. But I would give Lisimba some faults, too; Helen... For a political piece, this seemed to waver between not wanting to get "into it" (by having only a few characters) and wanting to dive right in (GW Bush's trial). I think you need to figure out exactly what the root of the play is.
The tit-for-tat between Lisimba and Helen seems to be the real meat here, their power struggle. But I would give Lisimba some faults, too; Helen as of now seems way too with looking good than with what non-white races think of her.
FORMAT:
* Numbering starts before the actual text does. This isn't very "clean" looking.
* There is a lack of punctuation thorough the piece. A lack of periods, the wrong marks (for instance, periods where question marks should be). The inclusion of parenthesis in the radio announcer's speech was very bothersome. I didn't know if he was speaking, or you were.
* As for parentheses as a whole, keep your formatting consistent. read -
A review of H.P. Lovecraft's The Dunwich Horror (revised)by BRYY_MILLER on 03/23/2011The action is very well-written, but it is also over-written. This is not a short story, this is a movie script. You also need to properly list your scene headings. For instance: LIVINA'S BEDROOM AT THE WHATELY MANSION should read WHATELY MANSION - LIVINA'S BEDROOM Put parenthesis on a separate line from dialogue. The dialogue is brilliant. It's not vague, like most people... The action is very well-written, but it is also over-written. This is not a short story, this is a movie script. You also need to properly list your scene headings. For instance:
LIVINA'S BEDROOM AT THE WHATELY MANSION
should read
WHATELY MANSION - LIVINA'S BEDROOM
Put parenthesis on a separate line from dialogue.
The dialogue is brilliant. It's not vague, like most people trying to imitate Lovecraft. It's alive. It's real. The characters don't beat around the bush, trying as to not offend the non-HPL crowd. It simply does its thing.
It reads like an Indiana Jones script. The pace is top notch and lightning speed, and it is compressed without feeling bogged down by things happening all the time.
Whil your pace is excellent, Armitage's reveal on page 57 comes way too late in the game. The movie will be half over. Find a way to compact it all. Maybe bring in Simms' exposition into the intro. Maybe a mis en scene.
Page 67: Will just got done proclaiming that his intent was to kill our four heroes - now he says he will let them live?
I love the idea of the hero asking a Lovecraft villain the almost rhetorical question of 'why are you doing this?', and the villain's response being 'um, duh, power'.
Ian's madness is the best use of the literary device of having people go insane since Lovecraft penned it. Great job.
It ends rather suddenly. There's no cool down, no aftermath.
read -
A review of Merely Freshmenby BRYY_MILLER on 03/17/2011You have some format issues, such as not introducing character names in the script itself, but rather through dialogue. Indicate what is a flashback and what isn't (in the scene headings). You also need to cut down on the narration and VOs (both are different "features"), as a lot of it is superfluous and only bogs down the lightning pace of this script. Also, the music:... You have some format issues, such as not introducing character names in the script itself, but rather through dialogue. Indicate what is a flashback and what isn't (in the scene headings). You also need to cut down on the narration and VOs (both are different "features"), as a lot of it is superfluous and only bogs down the lightning pace of this script.
Also, the music: you don't know if you can get the rights to the music yet, so don't make it a sure thing in your script. This just comes off as sloppy. Wishful, but sloppy.
The humor is clever, fast, and everyone. It is also extremely smart. This is a cross between Arrested Development and The Breakfast Club. I feel like every single character is fully formed and fleshed out. Each one has their own ridiculously unique quirk as well as their own storyline.
We don't need to know what Amsterdam is. But we do need to hear Todd speak.
The ending is good, and it only WORKS due to the fact that every character is so fully formed. It's real. read -
A review of The Mouse Houseby BRYY_MILLER on 03/03/2011FORMAT: * Don't have a fancy title. A simple "_____" underscore "By _____" is simple enough. You also don't need to list the play's name more than once (unless it's a header). * Don't start numbering your pages until the text starts. * Maybe bold the character names only in dialogue? Otherwise, with the CHARACTER, PARENTHESIS, and DIALOGUE all bolded, it is really hard... FORMAT:
* Don't have a fancy title. A simple "_____" underscore "By _____" is simple enough. You also don't need to list the play's name more than once (unless it's a header).
* Don't start numbering your pages until the text starts.
* Maybe bold the character names only in dialogue? Otherwise, with the CHARACTER, PARENTHESIS, and DIALOGUE all bolded, it is really hard to read. Everything bleeds into each other.
* You don't need to specify in parenthesis what the characters are doing if you have just put that in the stage directions. In fact, your parenthicals are way too wordy overall. Trust your actors. The amount of times that you "hold the hand" of the reader is kind of insulting.
* Page 7: Format "(sigh)" to be before the line. Put it in a beat. In between Carson's lines.
CARSON
... I have no cookies.
(sigh)
May I...
* Page 7: V.O. = O.S.
CONTENT:
* Page 6: I think "role" is supposed to be "roll".
* The closing line of Scene 1 is fantastic and a great tie-together.
* Page 17: I don't quite understand Carson's sudden interest in the Intruder. It feels like you are forcing a Plot. Maybe if the Intruder had more of a connection with Carson... but he doesn't.
OVERALL:
It's a solid play that has three definite beats: Bobby, Troy, and then Thomas. You just have to trust your reader to ACT. And you have it horribly over-formatted at this point with the parenthesis, especially of things people are already doing. read -
A review of Of Wolf and Manby BRYY_MILLER on 03/01/2011* Page 1: Don't need an insert if it's on a sign. * Page 5: Don't act like the Dartboard and Pool Table are scene headings. Describe them. They are part of the existing scenery. * Page 12: The psuedo-flashback that Dave gets tells us EVERYTHING we need to know about him. I love how your script is one big cat and mouse game with the audience. It's a thriller that makes us... * Page 1: Don't need an insert if it's on a sign.
* Page 5: Don't act like the Dartboard and Pool Table are scene headings. Describe them. They are part of the existing scenery.
* Page 12: The psuedo-flashback that Dave gets tells us EVERYTHING we need to know about him.
I love how your script is one big cat and mouse game with the audience. It's a thriller that makes us wonder if it's actually a thriller. The best kind of horror is that of the unexpected, and especially if the unexpected is NORMAL. Because that proves to us that life is more real than anything in film.
The only real complaint with the CONTENT of the text is your pacing. For a script as short as it is, you do a wonderful job of setting everything up, taking your time... but then the action all comes way too fast.
I would advise watching the films 'Ravenous' and 'Lake Placid'. An Odd choice, I know, but the pace in both films in regards to the horror is great. read -
A review of Darling Little Wifeby BRYY_MILLER on 02/28/2011FORMAT: Don't start numbering the pages until the actual text starts. Dialogue should not be separated. It should all rest on the same line. Also, you might want to spell out your character names, it might be easier to read. As well, parenthesis indicating tone and intent should be before dialogue. OVERALL: It's a solid play, but the formatting just needs to be fixed... FORMAT:
Don't start numbering the pages until the actual text starts.
Dialogue should not be separated. It should all rest on the same line.
Also, you might want to spell out your character names, it might be easier to read. As well, parenthesis indicating tone and intent should be before dialogue.
OVERALL:
It's a solid play, but the formatting just needs to be fixed. Invest in or at least look at how programs like Final Draft do it. Read other plays. People love plays that take historical events (or even other plays) and turn them on their head. So you have your hook right there. This is your 'JFK'. read -
A review of Please Don't Bury Meby BRYY_MILLER on 02/27/2011FORMAT: Make a cast list. Put it on the same page as the setting and prop list. Don't start page numbering until the actual text starts. CONTENT: SCENE 1: Way too short. I know you most likely meant this to be foreshadowing, but we need some more substance here. Surely you can move some of the scene 2 dialogue here? SCENE 2: McDonald's will need to be changed to either... FORMAT:
Make a cast list. Put it on the same page as the setting and prop list. Don't start page numbering until the actual text starts.
CONTENT:
SCENE 1: Way too short. I know you most likely meant this to be foreshadowing, but we need some more substance here. Surely you can move some of the scene 2 dialogue here?
SCENE 2: McDonald's will need to be changed to either a new eatery or a parody.
SCENE 5: Toby is introduced kind of melodramatically... we don't know who he is. All he does is yell at Chris over vague stuff. For a main character, he doesn't do much. Hopefully he gets better.
OVERALL:
The whole play needs to be like Scene 10, with Scratch and Steve. That had perfect pacing. Everything else is too vague, too fast, with no character development. No room for the audience to feel like they care about anything.
Maybe you should write an alternate version as a One Act? See what you like better, if anything changes? read
Comments About BRYY_MILLER 29
-
jovan.jevtic on 06/05/2011
Hi,
Thanks for the review of Paris countdown
Jovan -
mlambush on 05/13/2011
Thank you! Much appreciated. -
**DELETED ACCOUNT** on 04/28/2011
Hi Bryy - thanks for taking time to review POTM. I appreciate your comments.
Best
Rebecca -
Johnstone82 on 03/31/2011
Hey, well, you'll have to talk to my agent first if you want to film it. Oh wait, I don't have an agent...
Dude, thanks for the praise and suggestions for my script. It'll take some extra work, but it'll get there!
John -
lizzayn on 03/23/2011
Thanks for the freewill review of The Pickman Inheritance. -
jeff2680 on 03/04/2011
Hey, belated thanks for the free will review of Of Wolf and Man.
Jeff -
olavay on 02/23/2011
No condescension intended.
You are a beautiful child of God just like me.
Just engaging in conversation and opening the floor a bit.
I wanted you to understand as I understand. No one knows all but God.
It would be foolish to observe otherwise.
Only then can progress take place.
As I'm sure you'll agree.
Actually I appreciate that you were so kind to offer your pov. I just wanted to express mine.
Your time is just as valuable as mine.
God bless.
-
olavay on 02/23/2011
Hey,
Thanks for the review of "BC 2000".
Although I didn't really get much from your commentary, there are two items I'd like to address.
"1) Bonnie and Clyde were real people, so the hook of this being an adaptation is gone.
2) There doesn't seem to be any real reason as to why you are retelling this story. WHY is it so important that they not be white? What does it say about society, in contrast to the original duo? "
Yes Bonnie and Clyde are spirits who had a human experience. We the public knew what they did, but we never really understood "why". I approach this in "BC 2000".
Good, evil is all one energy, a plethora of choices which create paths for us. One being virtue of wisdom, and the other being the vice or the means in which we resolve "the issue".
Bonicia and Clydell provide this clear dynamic.
On a micro level, I show the duality of parallels.
The story of the struggle to "make it" and "take it" is an American one, neither Black White Purple or Red.
Everyone wants to live on easy street, question is how will you go about doing it?
WHY is it so important that they be white?
What does it say about society, in contrast to the original duo? You tell me.
There is duality in everything.
Why are some racial/gender slurs off limits to some but not to others?
What does getting justice have to do with race, sexual orientation, religious POV, or class of wealth and status?
Why are there a seperate subsystems of values based on one's physical identity and not your spiritual?
i.e. It's acceptable for criminals to get away if they're WASP, and it's a matter of debate for everyone else.
When in reality these terms technically have "no" racial affiliation rather, they are mere colloquial adjectives of negative exchange.
So how does race define who does what and who should get away it?
It doesn't society as a whole of laws does by its behaviors. This is why there a science devoted to it.
It is only by addressing our ills that we detox from them.
This is the lesson Bonicia and Clydell are both learning and teaching.
When you get the answers - me and God would love to know.
Shoot us an email.
God bless.
-
capper on 02/22/2011
capper wrote:BRYY_MILLER wrote:You have no idea who I am if you think that offends me.
Then sir, this should hopefully be right up your alley!
Ahhhh, you read the SOM NOM. The latest revision is changed quite considerably from the SOM NOM (very different 1st act), though the comedy is still the same so you'd probably will still feel the same way about it.
In regards to Ted being a "she" once he is possessed, MANY other reviewers got confused with me still calling Ted a "he" so I changed it to "she" to stop it. it did, but I agree with you, Ted is still a "he" but, technically.
Thanks for reading, and I'm glad you enjoyed it somewhat.
Cheers
-
capper on 02/22/2011
BRYY_MILLER wrote:You have no idea who I am if you think that offends me.
Then sir, this should hopefully be right up your alley!
Write a Comment
Browse:
Copyright © 2001-2013 Trigger Street Labs. All Rights Reserved.
Comments About BRYY_MILLER 29
-
Quote
Hi,
-
Quote
Thank you! Much appreciated.
-
Quote
Hi Bryy - thanks for taking time to review POTM. I appreciate your comments.
+ more commentsjovan.jevtic on 06/05/2011
Thanks for the review of Paris countdown
Jovan
mlambush on 05/13/2011
**DELETED ACCOUNT** on 04/28/2011
Best
Rebecca