After losing his job, Stan Dobbs has been living a double life. Hiding his situation from his family he looks for... more
Member Participation Level:
0 1 2 3Recent Activity
Bio
Writin', lernin', livin'.
Submissions by jiggson
-
a screenplay by jiggson
-
a screenplay by jiggson
Jim was accustomed to an isolated existence. That was before the zombie apocalypse. Now he finds himself leading... more
-
a screenplay by jiggson
Jim had grown accustomed to an isolated existence long before the zombie apocalypse. Now he finds himself leading... more
Reviews by jiggson 64
-
A review of Love Hack's Revengeby jiggson on 04/11/2013This was a well written screenplay with few typos or formatting errors. The characters all had clear voices and I could easily follow the plot and story. The one element of the structure that could use some work is the use of Voice Over. Voice Over is a difficult thing to pull off successfully and it does not work in this script. The short segment at the beginning between... This was a well written screenplay with few typos or formatting errors. The characters all had clear voices and I could easily follow the plot and story. The one element of the structure that could use some work is the use of Voice Over. Voice Over is a difficult thing to pull off successfully and it does not work in this script.
The short segment at the beginning between Keegan and the principal is weak and not needed. It give no special insight into who Keegan is that we do not get in the opening scenes with him interacting with is coworkers. Neither scene, school or opening with co-workers, paint Keegan as anyone interesting.
Keegan is a very problematic lead. He is instantly unlikeable and there are few redeeming qualities in him to drive the readers interest in his motivations or the outcome. I never understood why anyone why Frankie would help him in his plans to win over a woman or why any of the other characters would risk themselves to support his schemes.
This might work better as a sitcom where Keegan's character could be more fully explored and the qualities in him that other people find attractive could be seen by the viewer/reader.
He reminds me somewhat of Sheldon from Big Bang Theory except Keegan has never accomplished anything. In fact, there is not a ton of evidence to support his being a genius, other than him stating it over and over. Sheldon (Big Bang Theory) is an unlikable character as well, but the show goes out of its way to occasionally show the audience why he is likable.
One other note is that the dialogue is a bit wordy at times and could be trimmed down to help speed up the pace of the script.
The tone and the pace could both be addressed in subsequent drafts. read -
A review of School for the Blind (first draft)by jiggson on 04/02/2013School for the Blind was well written and clear. The formatting was correct for the most part. There were a couple of places where dialogue was in the Action section and vice versa. These are easily correctable. The characters had different personalities and voices and the screenplay was an easy read. I did have a hard time telling if this was meant to be a comedy or a... School for the Blind was well written and clear. The formatting was correct for the most part. There were a couple of places where dialogue was in the Action section and vice versa. These are easily correctable. The characters had different personalities and voices and the screenplay was an easy read.
I did have a hard time telling if this was meant to be a comedy or a dramatic story with comedic elements? A story like this really requires the audience to be on board with the protagonist, but the opening scene concerns a suicide attempt that our protagonist instigated. What Denise is revealed to have done in the opening pages make her a very problematic protagonist. She shows no true remorse for her action and immediately I was not rooting for her.
This is also how the screenplay ends with Dr. Abbey in a middle school where he can prey on more (and younger) students. These two points illustrate the tonal issues I had with the story and with our protagonist.
The school that is at the center of the story belongs in a much lighter and funnier story because it is silly and over the top. The horrible ways characters treat each other are much to dark for this backdrop in my opinion.
read -
A review of The Girl of Givetby jiggson on 04/04/2011The Girl of Givet was an easy enough read and the time period, though used often, still has plenty of potential for compelling stories. I did feel that it should have focused more on Adeline and her story, given the title. This is a hard screenplay for me to review for some reason, so I am just going to list out some of the areas I felt could use some improvement. Opening... The Girl of Givet was an easy enough read and the time period, though used often, still has plenty of potential for compelling stories. I did feel that it should have focused more on Adeline and her story, given the title.
This is a hard screenplay for me to review for some reason, so I am just going to list out some of the areas I felt could use some improvement.
Opening scene isn't needed. It is all exposition and is conveyed better elsewhere in the story.
The scene immediately following the exposition in the opening scene is never given context. It feels like something we should be building towards throughout the backstory/time jumping, but it is not. You have the biggest set piece in the screenplay in the second scene and it has no consequence to your story.
There are way too many "Super" inserts for date and many like "the next day", or "Half an hour into Fournier’s interrogation", or "approaching the Carmelite cloister, June, 1942.", or "the next morning" etc. are not really how Supers are used. At least they do not feel effective here.
Switching back and forth between Paul Olivier and Fournier is distracting and not needed.
I didn't understand the struggle at teh heart of the screenplay. There is never a good reason given for Adeline being kept in the dark and at arms read from Paul Olivier. Maybe when she first arrives, but once she is in the Resistance and the Old Belgian and the Prior are working with here, you would think they would trust here enough to know about the hidden artists (Oscar and Horst).
The stakes are never quite high enough, which is odd considering the setting. There is opportunity to add real drama and danger to this story, especially with Huber, but he is more of a blowhard, than a danger, and when he is finally defeated, it is quite easily done.
The story as a whole needs to be narrowed and focused.
Who is the girl from Givet?
What does she want?
What is stopping her from getting it?
How is she going to overcome that obstacle?
I did think the writing was clear and concise. I was able to follow the action and the story, which is good considering this is a non-linear story at times. the characters were pretty well drawn and each had their own personality. The setting was vivid and I could visualize the world in which the story was set.
I wish you the best of luck with it and I hope story continues to evolve and improve. read
Write a Comment
Submissions by jiggson
-
a screenplay by jiggson
After losing his job, Stan Dobbs has been living a double life. Hiding his situation from his family he looks for... more
-
a screenplay by jiggson
Jim was accustomed to an isolated existence. That was before the zombie apocalypse. Now he finds himself leading... more
-
a screenplay by jiggson
Jim had grown accustomed to an isolated existence long before the zombie apocalypse. Now he finds himself leading... more
-
a screenplay by jiggsonGenres: crime, mystery/suspense
Keegan Dunn is a janitor for the deceased. When an ugly death occurs, he is there to wipe up the mess... for a... more
Reviews by jiggson 64
-
A review of Love Hack's Revengeby jiggson on 04/11/2013This was a well written screenplay with few typos or formatting errors. The characters all had clear voices and I could easily follow the plot and story. The one element of the structure that could use some work is the use of Voice Over. Voice Over is a difficult thing to pull off successfully and it does not work in this script. The short segment at the beginning between... This was a well written screenplay with few typos or formatting errors. The characters all had clear voices and I could easily follow the plot and story. The one element of the structure that could use some work is the use of Voice Over. Voice Over is a difficult thing to pull off successfully and it does not work in this script.
The short segment at the beginning between Keegan and the principal is weak and not needed. It give no special insight into who Keegan is that we do not get in the opening scenes with him interacting with is coworkers. Neither scene, school or opening with co-workers, paint Keegan as anyone interesting.
Keegan is a very problematic lead. He is instantly unlikeable and there are few redeeming qualities in him to drive the readers interest in his motivations or the outcome. I never understood why anyone why Frankie would help him in his plans to win over a woman or why any of the other characters would risk themselves to support his schemes.
This might work better as a sitcom where Keegan's character could be more fully explored and the qualities in him that other people find attractive could be seen by the viewer/reader.
He reminds me somewhat of Sheldon from Big Bang Theory except Keegan has never accomplished anything. In fact, there is not a ton of evidence to support his being a genius, other than him stating it over and over. Sheldon (Big Bang Theory) is an unlikable character as well, but the show goes out of its way to occasionally show the audience why he is likable.
One other note is that the dialogue is a bit wordy at times and could be trimmed down to help speed up the pace of the script.
The tone and the pace could both be addressed in subsequent drafts. read -
A review of School for the Blind (first draft)by jiggson on 04/02/2013School for the Blind was well written and clear. The formatting was correct for the most part. There were a couple of places where dialogue was in the Action section and vice versa. These are easily correctable. The characters had different personalities and voices and the screenplay was an easy read. I did have a hard time telling if this was meant to be a comedy or a... School for the Blind was well written and clear. The formatting was correct for the most part. There were a couple of places where dialogue was in the Action section and vice versa. These are easily correctable. The characters had different personalities and voices and the screenplay was an easy read.
I did have a hard time telling if this was meant to be a comedy or a dramatic story with comedic elements? A story like this really requires the audience to be on board with the protagonist, but the opening scene concerns a suicide attempt that our protagonist instigated. What Denise is revealed to have done in the opening pages make her a very problematic protagonist. She shows no true remorse for her action and immediately I was not rooting for her.
This is also how the screenplay ends with Dr. Abbey in a middle school where he can prey on more (and younger) students. These two points illustrate the tonal issues I had with the story and with our protagonist.
The school that is at the center of the story belongs in a much lighter and funnier story because it is silly and over the top. The horrible ways characters treat each other are much to dark for this backdrop in my opinion.
read -
A review of The Girl of Givetby jiggson on 04/04/2011The Girl of Givet was an easy enough read and the time period, though used often, still has plenty of potential for compelling stories. I did feel that it should have focused more on Adeline and her story, given the title. This is a hard screenplay for me to review for some reason, so I am just going to list out some of the areas I felt could use some improvement. Opening... The Girl of Givet was an easy enough read and the time period, though used often, still has plenty of potential for compelling stories. I did feel that it should have focused more on Adeline and her story, given the title.
This is a hard screenplay for me to review for some reason, so I am just going to list out some of the areas I felt could use some improvement.
Opening scene isn't needed. It is all exposition and is conveyed better elsewhere in the story.
The scene immediately following the exposition in the opening scene is never given context. It feels like something we should be building towards throughout the backstory/time jumping, but it is not. You have the biggest set piece in the screenplay in the second scene and it has no consequence to your story.
There are way too many "Super" inserts for date and many like "the next day", or "Half an hour into Fournier’s interrogation", or "approaching the Carmelite cloister, June, 1942.", or "the next morning" etc. are not really how Supers are used. At least they do not feel effective here.
Switching back and forth between Paul Olivier and Fournier is distracting and not needed.
I didn't understand the struggle at teh heart of the screenplay. There is never a good reason given for Adeline being kept in the dark and at arms read from Paul Olivier. Maybe when she first arrives, but once she is in the Resistance and the Old Belgian and the Prior are working with here, you would think they would trust here enough to know about the hidden artists (Oscar and Horst).
The stakes are never quite high enough, which is odd considering the setting. There is opportunity to add real drama and danger to this story, especially with Huber, but he is more of a blowhard, than a danger, and when he is finally defeated, it is quite easily done.
The story as a whole needs to be narrowed and focused.
Who is the girl from Givet?
What does she want?
What is stopping her from getting it?
How is she going to overcome that obstacle?
I did think the writing was clear and concise. I was able to follow the action and the story, which is good considering this is a non-linear story at times. the characters were pretty well drawn and each had their own personality. The setting was vivid and I could visualize the world in which the story was set.
I wish you the best of luck with it and I hope story continues to evolve and improve. read -
A review of Hurricane Seasonby jiggson on 11/15/2007This was a pretty standard, come from behind, underdog story. That being said, I rooted for the kids and wanted to see them succeed. Past the middle of the story, Eric was an easy character to support. His breakdown on his sisters and girlfriend was hard to swallow. It will be hard to root for a character who is a complete ass to little girls and forces them out of a... This was a pretty standard, come from behind, underdog story. That being said, I rooted for the kids and wanted to see them succeed.
Past the middle of the story, Eric was an easy character to support. His breakdown on his sisters and girlfriend was hard to swallow. It will be hard to root for a character who is a complete ass to little girls and forces them out of a home and into a refugee shelter.
The premise was a bit thin. I had a hard time believing that anyone would allow this (outside kids forming a team and playing football in another conference) and if the story had been a little more whimsical, I might have bought it, but as is, you play it for the drama and I had trouble believing it would be allowed. Eric's little sisters were thin compared to other characters as was Eric's Mom. Coach Tuker was a jerk for jerk's sake and if there had been some motivation behind his actions, it would make him a much stronger antagonist. The writing was clean and I didn't notice any typos. There were a number of cliche'd descriptions and the rest of the writing implied that the author could do better.
I thought the reporter angle would have been stronger if Cassie had orchestrated it, instead of it just being a fluke that they were walking by the reporter (with camera crew) at the right moment.
I liked using Katrina as a backdrop and this allowed for some solid drama.
Only other note I made was that the ending felt abrupt. The game's over, Peace meets up with his younger brother and Eric finds someone his father saved. The end. I was left underwhelmed by the quick wrap-up.
Overall enjoyable though. The refugee kids were easy to root for. There was plenty of drama. The writing was clean. read -
A review of The Mineby jiggson on 10/11/2007I believe The Mine has been on TS in various versions, for quite some time, so I was happy to see it as an assignment. This was one of the more polished scripts I have read on Triggersreet. You did a solid job crafting an ensemble cast of characters and weaving the story of a WWI assault around them. The writing is professional, the structure is solid, and the characters... I believe The Mine has been on TS in various versions, for quite some time, so I was happy to see it as an assignment.
This was one of the more polished scripts I have read on Triggersreet. You did a solid job crafting an ensemble cast of characters and weaving the story of a WWI assault around them.
The writing is professional, the structure is solid, and the characters are compelling. Good work.
As a whole the script works, so take my notes for what they are… one person’s opinion. I made a few notes while reading that I will share here.
1. Jack has many reasons to not want to go back to war, but when the call comes, he takes it right away. I think it would be more compelling if the resisted re-enlistment, but decided to go anyway. Whether it was because of his wife’s reluctant encouragement, guilt trip from the army, or another cause.
2. On p. 8 when the plan to mine the ridge is introduced, I felt it needed a little more “oomph”. This is the movie. What transpires in this scene is what sets in motion the next 99 pages of material. I wanted a little more out of this scene.
3. The drowning scene on p.26 only exists to set up the brief exchange between Jack and McCcullough. It doesn’t push the story forward at all the exchange works just as well without it. We don’t know any of the people who drown, they are only there for fodder and I would cut it.
4. p.57 It seemed within Jacks character to give the drunkards a little punishment for getting out of line, but only a little. Like a morning wake up call to haul chalk with a hangover.
5. These guys are all in a very stressful situation, and though they grow close during the story (understandably so), I would expect a little conflict to creep in here and there.
That is about all I have and as I stated above, the script works as it exists now. If you don’t change a thing, it is still a success.
Best of luck with it and I am glad I finally had an excuse to read it. read -
A review of Operation: Atomic Blitzby jiggson on 10/09/2007I have been taking this script in, in small bites all week, which is not my preferred method for reading. That being said, I enjoyed it and wished I could have had a longer stretch of time to inhale it. This is a fun script/story. It doesn't take itself too seriously and that is just what it needs to succeed. There were only a couple of story points I didn't follow.... I have been taking this script in, in small bites all week, which is not my preferred method for reading. That being said, I enjoyed it and wished I could have had a longer stretch of time to inhale it. This is a fun script/story. It doesn't take itself too seriously and that is just what it needs to succeed.
There were only a couple of story points I didn't follow.
The part about Dukes having planted the “dud” explosives in the tree... Why did he have to plant them there? The Commandos brought guns and other gear, they couldn't bring explosives? Where was it mentioned that they were left in the tree for them? I just read they they open a tree and there are explosives there, I didn't understand that they were left by someone else until way late in the script. I went back and read the first couple of pages, but there isn't an explanation for how the explosives got in the tree.
Easy fix, but it threw me while reading.
The other story point, well, convenience really, is when Hamlet pops out of the manhole close to the pier. It seemed too easy that he would show up at the right spot at the right time. Not that big of a deal , but I made a note of it while reading.
There was an exchange on page 21 that I didn't understand. Von Kiel says Johanna left for Copenhagen, then immediately says that she should be around the castle somewhere. I read it a couple of times to see if I missed something and I was either too tired to catch it, or the lines conflict with one another.
There are some stretches here and there in abilities, science, etc. but the script and story were compelling enough that I let it go and just bought into the world you created.
Early on I got confused about Garret and Davies being the same person. He is called Davies, but his dialogue line is Garrett. Wasn't a big deal as the story went on, but early it was confusing.
Overall this was enjoyable. It took a little while to get going, but once into the main story (and killing off most of the early cast) it flowed well and I enjoyed the read. I did hope one of Garrett's comrades had made it to the ground alive, but that was not their fate I guess.
Good luck with the script! read -
A review of Thrillby jiggson on 10/01/2007Thrill is a quick read and the story delivers on the title. There is a lot of exciting action here and it is very visual. The action reads well and I could follow the complex sequences easily. So, nice work there. The writing is stronger late in the screenplay than in the beginning and I think the screenplay would be well served if the author revisited the first 15 pages... Thrill is a quick read and the story delivers on the title. There is a lot of exciting action here and it is very visual. The action reads well and I could follow the complex sequences easily. So, nice work there.
The writing is stronger late in the screenplay than in the beginning and I think the screenplay would be well served if the author revisited the first 15 pages and did some work there. The writing is more passive (lots of is of 's in the first few pages), but I didn't notice this later in the script.
There is some flahyness to the writing, but it wasn't distracting for this reader and suited the tone of the story well enough.
I had a couple of problems with the story though: Greg survives the free fall in the intro (could the chute deploy at the last moment to at least slow the decent?) Cassie came off as kind of weak. Bobby flips to wanting out of the “thrill life” too easily after one big scare. Chance goes from thrill seeker to not caring about his teammate's death and kidnapping Cassie with no apparent reason.
Those last two bothered me the most.
Bobby and Greg's conversation about Bobby wanting to quit gets repetitive (p.62-64), it is the same point-=counter point made again and again with no real point. Bobby started the whole thing, is putting up 100mil and folds like a bad poker hand at the first sign of trouble? In the challenge he concocted? Then he folds again to go ahead with the next challenge? I had trouble swallowing that one. It didn't seem to fit the personality of the person we had grown to know over the first 60 pages. This is the guy who almost killed his best friend while wresting during a sky dive, then has the stones to ask that some guy to be his wingman in a thrill competition after not speaking for three years. He apparently didn't even stop by to check up on Greg during his recuperation. I don't buy that he is going to be the voice of reason because he got too close to a the wheels of a Z.
Chance is a man-of-the-world playboy. He likes fun, power, and adrenaline. He helps Greg win Cassie back, he laughs off near death experiences. He charms girls two at a time. For him to blow off his Alexis' death (everyone is a bit flip about her passing) and then kidnap Cassie and tie her to a roller coaster of death was hard to believe. I'm not sure how to fix this one. Maybe if the whole competition was supposed to be orchestrated by some mysterious third party, that wouldn't let the participants out once they were in. The third party could turn out to be Chance, but at least his would explain his split personality.
I can suspend disbelief for the crazy action, for the young billionaires, for the free fall to earth, the complete recovery of this, the bribes to cops, etc. but I have to buy the character motivations for this kind of script to work for me. The world these people exist in is fantasy, so they have to be the anchor. They have to be what the audience can latch onto and believe in.
Anyway. I did enjoy the script. The writing worked well for me and I like Greg, Black Jack, and Bobby. I wanted to see Greg save the day and I was glad he did. Good luck with is and any future drafts or projects.
One last small note.
On Page 57 at the bottom Cassie says “it scares the hell out of me...”
On Page 60 in the middle Cassie says “Scare me to imagine”
The lines are very similar and read oddly so close together. read -
A review of The Shoe Treeby jiggson on 09/01/2007I enjoyed this script. I liked the characters and this made me care about their problems. I thought it was well written. There were only a couple of mistakes and these were not show stoppers. A small quibble is with the character's Lori and Leah's names. There were too close to one another and I got confused a couple of times as to whom I was following. Loris also disappears... I enjoyed this script. I liked the characters and this made me care about their problems. I thought it was well written. There were only a couple of mistakes and these were not show stoppers.
A small quibble is with the character's Lori and Leah's names. There were too close to one another and I got confused a couple of times as to whom I was following. Loris also disappears for fifty pages in the middle, which makes her seem more like a convenient sound board for Leah, than a real person.
The same thing happens with Joe and Trey. They are there once earl, give us some laughs, then nothing till the end.
I didn't understand if Porter was a good guy or not. He was window dressing instead of a character.
Why is Leah writing a script and was there any significance to it?
Paul is just all bad. I know there are people like this in the world, but why is he so bad and why would Stacy be with him? I would like to have seen his charm in action, to show how he could manipulate someone like Stacy into his life and that the danger existed for Ramada to fall into the same trap.
I'm not saying you need to give all these people lots of screen time, but they start out as interesting people, then disappear. I kept waiting for their return and their importance to the story.
There were a couple of gaps in the story that I had a problem with. There was no real resolution with Stacy, Paul, and Leah, especially the relationship with Stacy and Leah. I wanted something to happen there. You have connection between Paul, Finn, Ramada, and Stacy, but nothing ever comes of it. This may be on purpose and I am just missing the importance, but I thought there was going to be a reason for the connections happening early on. Everyone is interconnected, but there is no real reason for it.
One last thing, and this is more of a story suggestion, which I don't normally do in reviews. Leah is a smart he/she. She was a successful lawyer, so you wouldn't think she is dumb. So, why then does she kill herself right away to give her heart to Finn. You have an opportunity there for Finn to be sick and Leah to resolve the sub-plot with Stacy, his wife, Paul, etc. Then when she decides to sacrifice herself it could have more impact because she is doing it knowing that she may have had a chance at happiness after all.
That is a lot of picking above, but I want to assure you that I did enjoy the script. It was a quick read and it flowed well. I enjoyed the characters and wanted to know where the story was going. I wanted Paul to get his comeuppance, Leah to work things out with Finn, Finn to get his act together, etc. There were just a few too many loose ends at the end for it to be completely satisfying.
And this story has the potential to be very satisfying, poignant, emotional,etc.
Good luck with the script and thanks for posting. read -
A review of Between Heaven and Hellby jiggson on 02/19/2007This is an interesting premise and well executed. It was a quick read and I enjoyed it quite a bit. Your main character Sam is definitely annoying in the movie sense. I wanted to kick him in the nuts on more than one occasion. On the story… Most of my input is going to come here. I had some trouble with Jeff. His flip to send Sam to heaven at all costs comes abruptly... This is an interesting premise and well executed. It was a quick read and I enjoyed it quite a bit. Your main character Sam is definitely annoying in the movie sense. I wanted to kick him in the nuts on more than one occasion.
On the story…
Most of my input is going to come here. I had some trouble with Jeff. His flip to send Sam to heaven at all costs comes abruptly and without explanation. You mention something about quality over quantity, but it didn’t “cut it” for me. You would think there is a special place in hell for the annoying.
The story is told in flashback from the prospective of hell’s agent, but that plot is never resolved. I would expect to go back to the underground for the final scene. Possibly having the new guy in hell asking the obvious question of “but you didn’t get him?” Instead of that being answered on earth. I was really waiting for that last scene in Jeff’s office since the setup is made in the beginning. Even Titanic goes back to old Rose one more time for the movie’s finale.
There are lots of convenient circumstances in the script, from Mike and family showing up to old score’s of Jeff’s being in Vegas at the right time. This is a common occurrence in this type of story, but still always felt contrived.
The story could use just a little rearranging. The opening with several calls to customers might be better if they came after some sort of set-up scene.
On the writing…
You write well. The characters all speak in a unique voice, the descriptions are fulfilling without being too wordy and the flow work well. The characters are all a bit stereotypical, but they fit into the world you create. The most “over the top” character is Sam himself. It is hard to have a main character that grating and I am not sure if audiences would put up with him.
Overall the writing is quite good thought and I look forward to reading more from the author. read -
A review of Rizpahby jiggson on 02/11/2007I have to admit that I had a really hard time getting through this script. The subject might have had something to do with it, but the story was difficult to tackle. On the story… This story covers a lot of time and real estate. I had problems keeping up with where we were and where we were going. I also had problems trying to figure out the motivations of anyone in the... I have to admit that I had a really hard time getting through this script. The subject might have had something to do with it, but the story was difficult to tackle.
On the story…
This story covers a lot of time and real estate. I had problems keeping up with where we were and where we were going. I also had problems trying to figure out the motivations of anyone in the story. I do not know why these people react the way they do and I do not know how they will react to anything in the story.
Though Rizpah’s true love is Saul (I guess), she comes off like an opportunist that just latches on to whichever man shows her affection and has the most to offer. The relationships between the characters do not seem real. Egrep and Rizpah can be vicious to one another and just as quickly are embracing and crying together.
There is a lot of crying and mourning. Every few pages someone is tearing up and crying. This is not something you see often in film, even in overly emotional movies. You might want to see how many of these events occur and try to pair them down, so that those remaining have some emotional impact.
I am not sure what the overall arch is. What does Rizpah learn? How does she change?
I was also unclear as to the timeline. How many years do we cover? Egrep is old in the beginning of the story, how ancient must she be by the end?
I didn’t understand Saul’s fit on insanity.
Overall there were some decent scenes and some of them string together okay, but as a whole it was too much for me.
On the writing…
The dialogue was alright, though everyone speaks in that stilted manner common to period movies (why is that?). The men all sound similar to one another. The women had more pronounced voices of their own.
There were some typos in here, but I didn’t have my notepad when I read this one, so I am sorry that I can’t give you specific locations.
The battle/action sequences were easy enough to follow. I didn’t get lost on the fracas very often.
Overall…
This is a difficult story to tell, it spans decades and covers thousands of square miles. The time period is also a hard one to explore. I am curious to see what the writer would do with a more contemporary setting and a smaller scope. I wish you the best of luck with this and any future work. read
Comments About jiggson 2
-
Brandon Taber on 10/04/2009
Guess you have to change the name of your Zombieland script now, huh? -
Paul Iacono on 04/14/2008
Hey, thanks for your comments on "Strange Days". Funny thing -- I just uploaded a revised version last night, and I saw your review this morning and thought "Wow, that was fast!" lol. Then I realized you reviewed the old version, of course.
To be honest, I've never seen any of Rob Zombie's work, so maybe I'll check some out. (On the other hand, you couldn't pay me to watch the "Saw" series or "Hostel" .) I was going for more of a David Lynch kind of feel.
(And FYI, I'm aware of the difficulty I'll have selling a screenplay in which one lead gets ass raped and the other gets shot in the face. I can just see actors scrambling to take either role lol. So this has been more of an educational exercise for me, really.)
Again -- thanks so much for your comments!
Write a Comment
Browse:
Copyright © 2001-2013 Trigger Street Labs. All Rights Reserved.
Comments About jiggson 2
Brandon Taber on 10/04/2009
Paul Iacono on 04/14/2008
To be honest, I've never seen any of Rob Zombie's work, so maybe I'll check some out. (On the other hand, you couldn't pay me to watch the "Saw" series or "Hostel" .) I was going for more of a David Lynch kind of feel.
(And FYI, I'm aware of the difficulty I'll have selling a screenplay in which one lead gets ass raped and the other gets shot in the face. I can just see actors scrambling to take either role lol. So this has been more of an educational exercise for me, really.)
Again -- thanks so much for your comments!