Dan McGee's Review
The Death of Rachael Skye
Critique
The GOOD;
The writing is good from the jump start. The writer stays with the main character throughout the story.
The BAD:
Several things listed below can greatly improve the screenplay. I didn’t mention all grammatical errors, although there were quite a few.
Tristan should start off a little stronger emotionally. He gives in to Rachael’s emotions too early in the story.
First 12 pages: Good pacing.
It appears that some question marks are missing.
Pg. 20 – Darwin needs a unique voice; perhaps a ‘wise guy’ type voice would suit him.
Pg. 23 – Nevermind ‘who killed Rachael?’…’What happened to Rachael?’ Don’t repeat Tristan’s line. He asks ‘who killed Rachael, then asked ‘who killed her.’ I’d ask something similar such as ‘what happened to Rachel, or ‘what did you do to Rachel?’
When Eric asks, ‘who are you?’ A likely answer, ‘What’s it to you?’ or ‘Who gives a shit?”
Pg. 27 – Tristan telling Brandi, Eric killed his girlfriend is a little harsh. Perhaps he ‘Thinks Eric has something to do with a murder.’
Pg. 32 – Ty goes after Eric a little too easy. Perhaps Ty shouldn’t believe a word Tristan says. Later he should and could change his mind and go after Eric.
Pg. 49 – Eric and Krissy’s conversation doesn’t move the story forward nor is it believable. Someone is dead. No he isn’t going to get out of this. Some dialogue can be eliminated.
Of course, it appears the whole thing can be solved with an autopsy.
Pg. 56 – Who is Shasha and Viktor? They were not introduced correctly. Perhaps they can be mentioned in the first 12 pages.
Pg. 73 – The Russian mafia makes for too much mumbo-jumbo in the story. The Russian Mafia wasn’t introduced earlier. Perhaps they are Viktor and Shasha. They have no motive in the beginning therefore bringing them in later seems absurd. Rachael can have something to indicate she is part of Russian culture.
Pg. 76 – Another meeting? This is repetitious from an earlier scene.
Pg. 83 – The reader likes the drama of the police vs. Tristan in Rachael’s apartment.
Perhaps if Rachael was the daughter of a high ranking Russian businessman, it would give the Russian’s credibility. They don’t seem to fit well in this story.
Pg. 94-95 – The flashback was not marked correctly. Several question marks are missing.
Pg. 97 – Eric, Brandi, and Ty sit in an abandoned restaurant bound together. This is a repeat scene from earlier. The story takes yet another loop rather than move forward. This is the second scene that repeats itself in this story.
Pg. 112 – Darwin gets shot. This is uncharacteristic in an American drama. The good guys always win.
Pg. 130 – Unbelievable – Sasha’s chest wound would not allow him to speak.
CONCLUSION:
Tristan is the main character. He needs to be strong and smart. He cries in the first 5 pages. The murder of Rachel should make him angry thus anger can be his motive. He is much too weak and vulnerable. The audience can relate to strong leading characters. In addition, the weak character has no sympathy. No one cares if he finds the killer of Rachael.
The writer should read up on character traits. Why should the audience care about Tristan with his weak emotional tears for this girl?
Screenplay too long. Ending is drawn out way too long. 120 pages max.
Idea:
Perhaps Tristan gets arrested for the murder in the beginning of the story, he breaks out of jail to solve the murder. His time is short as detectives close in on him yet closes in on the case.
NOTE: This review does not factor into the site rankings.
Other Reviews by dandirtyfool
7
-
My line by line assestment;
Pg. 1 – Julie is dreaming about singing in an opera. If her dream is to become an opera singer, it is not shown in the story. What does her mother represent in the dream? Generally people represent a part of the dreamer. Doris, Julie's mother, transforms from a handsome man yet she is groggy, dirty, bitter, and mean looking.
Pg. 8 – Sandra...
My line by line assestment;
Pg. 1 – Julie is dreaming about singing in an opera. If her dream is to become an opera singer, it is not shown in the story. What does her mother represent in the dream? Generally people represent a part of the dreamer. Doris, Julie's mother, transforms from a handsome man yet she is groggy, dirty, bitter, and mean looking.
Pg. 8 – Sandra and Tania have a conversation about a baby. Does this have anything to do with the story?
Pg. 9 – Enter Floyd Babtiste and Tina in conversation. Yet another conversation that slows the story down. What does this have to do with the story?
The fortune cookie package can probably come in the story a little earlier.
Pg. 28 – I would’ve like to see Julie say something to answer the taunts from Tania.
Pg. 31 - The reader doesn’t understand the relationship between Brian and Tina.
Throughout the screenplay the headings do not indicate the location. Exp. Pg. 29 – Int. Kitchen – Who’s kitchen? Which building is this kitchen located?
Pg. 36 – Tina and Brian has just finished dinner. Brian and Tina spends a lot of time together. She is a new widow. This relationship is awkward.
Pg. 37 – re-enter the fortune cookie. This is a late event in the story. If this fortune cookie carries so much weight, why not have it in the story more often?
Pg. 40 – Tina is surprised she’s outside. Is this such a surprise? Theo could cough up a little water. He comes out of being submerged and immediately start speaking.
Pg. 46 – Not enough action. Lots of conversation but nothing doing other than a strange fortune cookie. What’s the purpose of the conversation between Julie and Fred?
Pg. 48 – Centers on Julie and the blown fuse in their house.
Pg. 57 – Sir Charles reprimand Matilda about her curtsying. Is this scene necessary? Isn't the story about Julie?
Pg. 62-63 – Julie and her mother discuss the date. Is this scene necessary?
Pg. 63 – Doris and Fred discuss Julie going on a date. This scene wakes up the screenplay. This is where the story takes shape.
Pg. 64 – Matilda is all about herself in the Boardroom. Is this scene necessary and does it move the story forward?
Pg. 64 – Lady Fiona and Sir Charles, two unknown characters discuss a painting. Is this scene necessary and what does it do for the story?
The fortune cookie has very little impact on the story. It is not centered around a fortune cookie. It appears the fortune cookie incidents are dropped into the story at specific points rather than a story written around a special or magical fortune cookie.
Pg. 71 – (Story) It seems a little odd that Doris and Fred would threaten Julie if she is so much help to them. It is unrealistic that they would empty her bedroom in one night just because she wants to go on a date.
Pg. 73 – There’s a fight breaking out in the Town Hall but the story breaks to Sir Charles. If the fight is important to mention than the story should stay on the fight until the incident is resolved. Or perhaps mention the fight before Julie and Brian leave.
Pg. 74-75 – Really good conversation with Julie and Brian. Julie is interested in changing things around. This gives the reader something to look forward to.
Pg. 94-95 – Sarah and Mark came out of nowhere. Is there a relationship between Julie and Sarah and Mark?
Overall: There isn't enough action throughout the story. In addition there are too many conversations that doesn't do anything for the story. If the story is about Julie, try eliminating every scene without Julie and see what's left. Matilda's self-gropping scene can go, Tania and her side-kick's scene can be shorten significantly. Also more drama can be used to spice things up a bit.
Good luck with future screenplays! I'll take a pass on this one.
read
-
Tristan, a 20 something year old visits Port Wikkalyn in search of love but finds himself intangled in a sea witches hold.
There are several issues with this story. First of all the sea witch is a good concept however the content, or the story surrounding the sea witch and Tristan is very weak and needs serious revising. Tristan needs to have a solid goal. What is he after?...
Tristan, a 20 something year old visits Port Wikkalyn in search of love but finds himself intangled in a sea witches hold.
There are several issues with this story. First of all the sea witch is a good concept however the content, or the story surrounding the sea witch and Tristan is very weak and needs serious revising. Tristan needs to have a solid goal. What is he after? Whom is he after. Early it seems that he is after one of the girls. He questions Rosco about the girls and their mother Gwen. However throughout the screenplay the writer breaks away from the main character, Tristan with several wordy and useless conversations; Pg. 10 – Lucas and Agatha. Pg. 62 – Rosco and Lucas. Pg. 65 – Ben and Lucas. Pg. 73 - Agatha and Besselle. Pg. 85- 86 – Rosco and Cathy. A lot of dialogue can be reviewed and cut from the script. The writer must get to the point in each scene. May I add that the characters are general and lack description. Most of the women are simply beautiful and lacking characteristics.
Here are some page by page items;
Pg. 2 – Mr. Norrel is mentioned early in the story yet has no significance to the story.
Pg. 20 – Too much shifting back and forth between characters. Rosco, Tristan, Gwen.
Tristan takes pictures with his camera. He didn’t take pictures before. Why now? Pg. 25, Once again a shift to two characters, Lucas and Ben.
Pg. 21 – Too much dialogue. Get to the point.
Pg. 28 – Too much mumbo-jumbo with the large sea creature. Where did that come from?
Pg. 30 – Agatha says, ‘Gwen thought he was bad news.’ Perhaps there should be a better way to show Gwen’s dislike for Tristan. Show, don’t tell.
Pg. 34 – Tristan is interested in getting photos of the mermaid Gwen. This is where the action begans.
Pg. 37 – Again we lose the main character. This page focuses on Besselle and the male escort.
Pg. 55 – By now, Tristan and the reader should have an idea what it takes to stop the sea witch or rather what would eliminate or hurt a sea witch. There is nothing so far.
Another issue, the old ‘no one is good enough for my daughter’ is clichéd and doesn’t work in modern day stories. Perhaps he should be after something else or some object one of the women may possess.
Cathy’s intro is ‘another beautiful woman.’ This doesn’t say anything about her personality or characteristic.
Pg. 75-80 Good action. However what does Tristan have to lose? What is he after?
Final Image;
The last scene; Lucas shoots himself. This does nothing for the story. What happens to Tristan? If he's the main character, we want to know that he came out alright.
Suggestions:
Tristan perhaps wants a photo of faeries thus he takes a vacation to the Port Wikky and gets put through hell to get a photo.
There are numerous possibilities that can derive from this story however the writer should be clear and concise as to what the main character is after. I can see Tristan taking a vacation to get a photos of this mysterious sea witch yet ends up fighting to stay alive thus he has something to lose, his life. He is after something. (Photos of a sea witch that he perhaps heard about.) Perhaps he falls for one of the girls. He can get the right girl in the end after he kills off the sea witch. Killing the sea witch must somehow help the people of Port Wikkalyn. Many, many possibilities. have fun with the rewrite.
read
-
Maybe I'm one of those people who don't quite get it. I have to admit I had trouble following the story. The symbolism overweighs the actual story in my opinion. In the end, the cutting of the throat was significant to the story however there wasn't much context to keep my attention. I really don't like to read about a movie just to understand what really happened and this...
Maybe I'm one of those people who don't quite get it. I have to admit I had trouble following the story. The symbolism overweighs the actual story in my opinion. In the end, the cutting of the throat was significant to the story however there wasn't much context to keep my attention. I really don't like to read about a movie just to understand what really happened and this was one of those cases. I even watched the movie twice just to see if I picked up something I may have missed and both times watching, I didn't quite get the jist of the story.
I have to admit the cinematography was excellent in every way. I loved the colors, shadows, light, etc. The pencils lined up was nothing but art. Every photo, close up was done by someone who definately knows their stuff.
I can tell a lot of hard work went into this production, however I am going to have to pass on this one.
read
+ more reviews