Jan, I finally got round to your script; my apologies for the lengthy wait. I hope I can give you some useful notes.
‘The Perfect Gentleman’ is a variation on an extremely well-known theme, as exemplified in the Oscar-laden ‘My Fair Lady’ which you give several nods to in the script. So you’re up against some pretty stiff competition, including George Bernard Shaw! To pull off a challenge like that you need some outstanding ideas and the execution to go with them.
You’ve certainly put a lot of time and effort into this and there are several good things going for it. First off, changing the Audrey Hepburn character into a vagrant from the Bronx is a pretty cool move. There’s a lot of mileage to be had from that. And secondly, moving the upper-class action to Europe rather than England preserves the theme but gives the setting a bit more flavour. So the concept itself is a bit of a challenge but you’ve made a good start.
Let’s talk about Guy. Your whole story revolves around Guy’s transformation, so it needs to be good. Really good. At the moment I think you’ve got a long way to go. He should be a totally changed person when we see him at Cannes. Certainly his appearance has changed – but not much else. His opening lines are:
‘All but the last part. I'm not going to kill anyone for you.’
Poppy cringes at his thick Bronx accent. Really? I’m no expert on USA dialects, but this doesn’t sound much like a Bronx accent to me – either in delivery or phrasing. You need something more like:
‘What kinda dumb broad you? I ain’t gonna kill no fancy wardrobe for no-one.’
I know it’s difficult to convey an accent in a script – if you try to vary the spelling it can become a turn-off for the reader. But if you’re going to make a big deal out of his Bronx roots you need to make some kind of attempt to capture the sound in the rhythm of your dialogue. At the moment he talks exactly the way Poppy and Mia do. You could get a lot of comedy out of the Bronx speech but you need to work for it. At the beginning, his Bronx psyche should be oozing out of him. And that means peppering his speech with the sort of phrases you’d expect to hear from a Bronx boy – including a few sonsabitches, dickheads and motherfuckers. Then throw some nasty personal habits into the mix. He picks his nose and eats it. He doesn’t flush the toilet. He smokes roll-ups and slurps Budweiser. The audience should be saying to themselves, ‘There’s no way this Guy can be a gentleman.’
I don’t really think the Rumi angle works very well. Yes, it’s nice that he’s already got an appreciation of literature and an ear for Beethoven when we first meet him, but I think that works against the comedy. It just seems at odds with his background. I think it would be OK to introduce it at a later stage; maybe Rupert encourages him to read poetry and appreciate the music as well as teaching him to dance.
Likewise his extended grieving for his mother seems to me to be mawkishly sentimental when you should be primarily playing it for laughs. The scene where he tells the whole story to Poppy doesn’t ring true to me. It seems too facile that a hard-bitten, streetwise person like Guy would just blurt all this out in one go. Again, I think you could introduce it in the scenes at Cannes, where you could have him revealing this at the height of an argument with Mia, then storming off to catch a plane. That would provide a much more dramatic route.
Poppy and Mia are competently drawn but I think you could do more to differentiate them. With Poppy almost 20 years the elder, you could make her much more matriarchal so that Mia could be more wayward and impulsive. That could work quite well within the story. At the moment they seem to act and talk in a very similar way.
In terms of the storyline, there are several things that don’t seem to stack up. First of all, the wager that Guy can be turned into the perfect gentleman is one that seems to sprout tendrils all over the place. It should be straightforward enough; by the end of the first Act you want to have the wager firmly established. The girls think they can turn Guy from a Bronx tramp into the perfect gentleman; Harry thinks it can’t be done. A deadline is agreed upon, stakes are established, and the rules are plain for all to see.
But this is very far from being the case. On page 9, the bet is made, but it all seems a bit vague. How is Guy’s transformation into a gentleman going to be measured and judged? We don’t really know. A bet should entail winners and losers. What does Harry stand to win? What do Poppy and Mia stand to lose? Very little, seems to be the answer in both cases. But having set up the bet, you keep moving the goalposts...
On page 16 Harry decides he wants his money back with interest if he wins. Then on page 24 we suddenly find out that the wager is to be decided at Cannes. There’s been no mention of Cannes before then. On page 69, after Guy’s faux pas at the Wall Street club, Harry announces that ‘the bet is finished’. But a few pages later it seems to be back on the agenda. Then on page 81, Harry demands that a woman must fall in love with Guy, followed closely by Poppy’s announcement that ‘the shelter’ for the homeless (which hasn’t been mentioned before!) is not only going to be provided by Harry if he loses... he has to run it as well!
So the initial bet just seems to grow more branches all the time, leaving the reader very confused. I’m not saying the rules of the bet can’t be changed during the story – but it would have to be as a result of some plot development, a raising of the stakes. In any case the whole project seems heavily stacked against Harry – he doesn’t actually stand to win anything.
I think also you need to make it clearer where Harry earns all this money he’s squandering. The reader knows he’s an investment banker, but only because you’ve mentioned it in a descriptive passage (page 4). You need to demonstrate it to the viewer as well.
Another aspect which could do with some reinforcement is the girls’ motivation. It needs a stronger focus. The girls have been jilted, so they’re both pissed off. But that’s not quite the same thing as a desire to have a true gentleman around. We need to understand why they don’t just want a new lover – they want someone who’s stylish and considerate. So you need to show Poppy and Mia on the receiving end of some pretty boorish conduct. You have a montage doing exactly this on page 8, but it seems to sit rather awkwardly at this point in the script, as a series of flashbacks taking place while the girls are in the taxi. An alternative might be to move this to the beginning and use it to introduce the characters during the opening credits. But lay it on thick with a trowel. Show the ex-boyfriends behaving really badly – farting on the sofa, puking up after a boozy night, getting caught watching porn videos – all that stuff. That would then establish the girls’ need for someone a bit more cultured.
Structure-wise, the story falls into three parts which would normally correspond to a typical 3-Act structure:
1. The set-up of the bet and the search for a candidate, i.e. – Guy;
2. The education of Guy as a gentleman, and the various escapades he has to go through;
3. The events at Cannes and the final resolution.
So on a 125-page script (which is much too long, by the way, but more of that later) your first Act ends on page 24, about one-fifth into the story. That’s a little early. Your second Act ends around page 82, or two-thirds in. That’s seriously early! So I’d say the divisions within the story are OK but the dramatic structure needs a fair bit of work. Your final Act needs to be shorter, punchier and really racking up the action.
Last but not least, your script is riddled with spelling and punctuation errors - just look at the list below – and there are others I could have added. When you’re trying to get your script past a studio reader, it’ll kill your chances stone dead. The great bulk of these should be picked up by a good quality spell-check program, and the rest by a thorough proof-read.
Other reading notes:
1 Underlining I believe is still frowned upon by most script editors.
1 Try to avoid ‘we see’s.
6 INT. REAR OF CONCERT HALL- CONTINUOUS
You use the CONTINUOUS slugline a lot when it’s not suitable. LATER would be better in most cases. CONTINUOUS means what it says: i.e. the action unfolds in ‘real time’. It can’t be CONTINUOUS here because there has to be a time lag between Mia resting her head on Harry’s shoulder in the centre seats, and asking Guy for directions near the back of the hall.
10 ...her free-lance job at Nissan.
How are you going to convey this information to the viewer? It’s not enough just to tell the reader.
10 her manuscript for an anthropology book...
39 GUY And anthropology is... POPPY The study of man.
Guy’s already answered his own question on this (page 25). Doesn’t make sense for him to be asking it again.
40 Slow down... We should get going. A little contradictory!
45 You tend to over-write. There are scores of little passages throughout the script which could be pared down or omitted entirely. You need a more rhythmic, punchier tone to keep the reader engaged. If you go through the script and weed out all the places where you drift into novelistic prose, it would reduce your page count quite a bit. Just one example
They shake their heads, yes, maybe. Guy hears, smiles, waves.
INT. MIA AND POPPY'S PENTHOUSE VESTIBULE - DAY
Poppy and Mia wait for DICTION EXPERT #1 (70) to arrive.
Guy sits in living room reading Poppy's anthropology book.
He looks debonair in his tweed coat. Finally doorbell rings.
DICTION EXPERT #1
You could pare this down to:
Guy hears, smiles, waves.
INT. MIA AND POPPY'S PENTHOUSE VESTIBULE – DAY
Poppy opens the front door, revealing:
DICTION EXPERT #1
55 A lot of viewers won’t recognise the bridge in Central Park, or even connect it with his mother’s death. You need to find a more cinematic method of showing this.
65-66 Good scene in Wall Street club.
74 GUY So you're an anthropologist? This has already been discussed. You need to vary the dialogue.
93 I'd say he is a Yorkshire Man. Traces of Scottish Highlands. ??? They’re a long distance apart!
99 It's been in her family for 1000 years. Seems a little unlikely!
Countesses don’t fling themselves at strangers in the full glare of the public, no matter how macho and handsome the man is. They’re much too careful of their reputations to act like that. And presumably there’s a Count somewhere in the mix? Doesn’t he object to being a cuckold?
123 I don’t really understand the ending. Mia and Guy were re-united in the previous scene, but now it’s a year later and they’re apart again?
So the bad news is I think you’ve still got quite some way to go. But hey, it’s only my opinion and I’m sure you’ll get some very positive reviews. The good news is, the basics are there and everything can be fixed. I know how hard it is to put together a good script, so good luck with it. See you round the Message Boards!
Spelling, punctuation, typos, etc:
1 ... chooses an emerald chiffon dress to don.
3 ... throws her cell, and its housing separates.
4 ... checking his Rolex.
4 Neither of them is a gentleman...
6 Poppy worries a locket open... Worries??
7 He points to a well-dressed concert goer...
8 What if we hire professionals to help us?
9 He pats both their knees, happy he has cheered them up.
11 What have we got to lose?
11 ... our specimen?
12 Is that..?
12 They back-up, startled.
13 ... his brown pointy... pointy??
16 ...it'll only make me work harder.
17 Here, put your clothes in this.
20 ...brushes past them... (several instances of ‘passed’ for ‘past’ in script)
21 ...and he stumbles over...
21 ... take an axe...
25 Guy plays with shaving cream, not liking the smell. You omit commas quite frequently. Won’t highlight it again.
29 Resigned, Guy calms himself...
30 ...Guy chases down a cab heading downtown. His new clothes and hair are drenched.
30 You can't just think you’re a gentlemen, you...
32 ...we know you've seen one musical.
33 ...but let’s start...
36 ... gripped with sadness
37 ...takrd a bone to stir coffee. takrd??
38 ... pushes Mia's drawings aside to make room...
40 ... can you do all that...
43 Hey, take it easy...
45 Colin Firth?
46 The final expert is waiting...
47 Why put it off another minute?
48 Ready to get to work...
48 So, my young fellow...
53 Je ne sais quoi, if I do say so myself.
55 ... tilts his head quizzically.
57 Where are your shoes?
59 Where are your index cards? (Rupert would speak ‘correctly’.)
61 ... cease their repartee...
69 Does this mean we're not going to Cannes?
74 Guy jumps to the boy's aid...
74 Other mothers... grab their children and run.
75 It's just that mothers are responsible...
75 They walk through the park to practise...
75 Guy lets a woman know...
78 He takes her hand and they stroll...
80 and lets it slide through...
82 ...we'll up the ante too.
82 ...on the first night...
82 Whatever we can do to help you...
83 ...except Mia, who peeks over partitions...
83 ...the Palme d'Or.
83 You speak French?
83 Un petit peu.
83 Ma Cherie.
87 He admires the watch, glinting and sparkling.
92 When you label something...
92 ...you put it in a box and you’re prevented from...
97 ... bundles of newspapers...
97 ... bundles of newspapers...
98 Guy ends it...
98 ...she gets no attention.
102 ...right now I’m delighted...
103 if she falls in love with him in spite of it, we
116 ...greets foursome in vestibule...
117 Suddenly, Poppy gets an idea.
Review ID: 4011322
Other Reviews by Rfordyce 124
A review of HyperGraphiaby Rfordyce on 08/10/2014‘Hypergraphia’ is a very professional screenplay and I enjoyed it immensely. I don’t think the concept is entirely new, but this has a very surreal mood and a storyline which buzzes around your head like a swarm of bees. I love Martin’s fragile grasp of reality, his erudite speech patterns and his erratic thought processes. Just to savour his wordplay and autistic tendency... ‘Hypergraphia’ is a very professional screenplay and I enjoyed it immensely. I don’t think the concept is entirely new, but this has a very surreal mood and a storyline which buzzes around your head like a swarm of bees. I love Martin’s fragile grasp of reality, his erudite speech patterns and his erratic thought processes. Just to savour his wordplay and autistic tendency (surely he must be at least partly autistic?) would in itself be worth the trouble of reading this script. But it has so much more to offer than that. It’s a film noir, it’s a detective whodunnit, it’s a psychological thriller, but most of all it’s a script which has the potential to become a box-office success.
The characters are all distinctive and well-drawn. Each has their own recognisable voice. The story rattles forward at a fairly frenetic pace and grabs our attention throughout, but information is only revealed gradually to pile extra layer upon layer of mystery. Good job.
I think it would be presumptive to say that I completely understand the outcome of this convoluted storyline, but it might be in order to accept it for what it is – a product of Martin’s fragile mental state. I think I’m right in saying that we never actually see any on-screen killings, except in the final bust-up when Martin kills Richardson and is in turn shot by the Redheaded woman – so that scene is presumably a product of his own fevered imagination, since we then immediately see him talking to the Three Men in the final scene. An ending like that would normally give rise to loud howls of protest from the ‘It Was All Just A Dream’ huddle of critics who maintain that it’s the death-knell of any script. Whatever, schmatever – I think this script is entertaining enough to survive that criticism. It’s a statement that our life can’t be viewed through the single lens of our own consciousness – our life impinges on other people and we have to look through their lenses as well.
Anyway, enough of the psychobabble. I’m never comfortable with that (British, you see). There are elements in the script which could be improved. As much as I love Martin’s unique poetic dialogue, I think you rather over-egg the pudding with it sometimes. It feels like you enjoy writing the dialogue so much that you sometimes neglect other aspects of the script. At 118 pages some of it could be gently trimmed, and you could use the space gained to build up the film noir tone. I’m thinking of instances like the scene on page 69, although the same comments could apply to many other parts of the story:
“Martin aggressively shakes the desk in front of him, startling Dr. Maravich and causing her lamp to fall to the floor.”
This scene should be a big atmospheric moment, where you leave the audience wondering about the true state of Martin’s mind. Use the lamp to greater effect. Imagine shadows falling around their faces, their movements. Imagine creepy music playing on screen. Give it a bit more edge. So you could have something like:
INT. PSYCHIATRIST’S OFFICE - NIGHT
A single desk lamp illuminates the room. Dr Maravitch watches Martin pacing back and forth.
And what do you think is the most logical explanation for that?
Half of Martin’s face is in shadow. He hesitates, shrugs his shoulders.
Martin aggressively thumps the desk. The LAMP falls to the floor and goes out. Darkness.
A few seconds of SILENCE, and then:
Martin switches the lamp back on.
I don’t think that I should see you anymore.
Don’t just have the lamp falling; make it go out. Plunge the room into darkness; play around with it.
The continuous alliteration in your dialogue sometimes drifts into your description lines as well, e.g. –
A frumpy, flimsy British man…
Lee lazily greets…
There’s nothing wrong with this in principle but it may distract the reader’s attention from focusing on the actual content of the words. Unless you think it’s necessary, I’d remove it.
Other reading notes:
1 No title page!?
1 A little more description would be good, e.g. – is there a desk? What does Martin look like? And as regards the Three Men, I know you’re playing for mystery and tension, and I think your decision not to name them, to keep them faceless, is a good one. But a few more clues would be helpful. At the very least, describe what will be seen on screen. Does it suggest a police station? A psychiatric unit? A meeting hall?
3 INT. PSYCHIATRIST’S OFFICE - DAY Martin sits across from Dr. Maravich.
Might be better to use LATER to emphasise that it’s a different scene from the one before.
6 Show me the fucking baby.
Nice nod to ‘Jerry McGuire.’
7 MARTIN This is the last book in the series, Jerry.
On a slightly pedantic note, it seems unlikely that movie producers would be waiting to see the finished product if it’s a series of books. If they like the first books enough, the movie would get made anyway. Maybe make it that the producer has seen extracts from an uncompleted book, and is eagerly awaiting the finished product.
16 I assume that at this point, and other instances throughout the script, we go into freeze-frame or something of that ilk. It would be good to show this in your formatting, e.g. –
...and sees DETECTIVE RICH RICHARDSON, a hard-nosed, middle-aged man.
May I help you?
Yes, I’m –
DETECTIVE RICHARDSON IN FREEZE-FRAME:
This is Detective Rich Richardson................................................. Never mind that. I’m rambling.
BACK TO SCENE
...Detective Rich Richardson. I want…
21 It gives me an opportunity to say gazoontite. It’s my third favourite word in the English language.
‘Gesundheit’ is actually a German expression so I assumed you were playing ironic in some way here. Maybe you want to check it out.
44 You’ve really got me on the ropes, here. HA! HA!
47 Detective Richardson hands Martin an urn.
A bit unlikely – where was he hiding it?
53 Your visit the other day threw me for a loop.
It’s a lot longer than ‘the other day.’ Martin had time to grow a substantial beard!
66 It’s your handwriting. And it’s dated two years ago.
We need some clearer evidence of this – a written date on the manuscript, for instance.
83 Just a small stylistic point you should watch out for: you tend to repeat characters’ names too much in blocks of description, e.g. – “Martin dashes across the room ... Martin immediately goes to the fan fiction site... Martin begins to read it aloud...” Try to vary the style so that it doesn’t become repetitive.
I go see Gary.
Several new characters are introduced late in the script – a practice normally frowned on by screenwriter scribblers. I don’t have a problem with it here, because the story is strong enough to carry it, but just thought I’d mention it.
90 I like the scene with the biker and the monkey – very surreal.
The bribe accepted by the DMV worker seems a little unlikely – I assume it’s a highly regulated organisation. See if you can come up with a better idea.
103 Suddenly Martin hears cop SIRENS.
Would the police have sirens blaring if they were on a secretive mission? Might be more effective if they simply appear without warning.
115 Martin frees his hands, reaches for his gun, points it at Detective Richardson...
The suspension of disbelief is broken here. There’s been no mention of the gun. Richardson would surely have searched him. And yet it’s suddenly there in Martin’s hands at the critical moment. I’m sure you can come up with a better narrative.
Typos, grammar, etc:
18 Hypergraphia, a disorder...
18 ... picks up a book off Martin’s bookshelf.
20 Yes, Mary Pickett.
47 Detective Richardson hands Martin an urn.
58 ... and fumbles it on to the floor.
63 ... If you ever need anything taxidermied,..
81 Martin sits in a dark room...
115 Detective Richardson stops singing; he cocks the hammer...
Thanks for this enjoyable read. A few more polishes, and I think you could have a winner here. Best of luck with it!
by Rfordyce on 08/03/2014Let’s start with the good stuff. You’ve got a nice concept here: a kindergarten sleuth who inhabits his own world but pulls everyone around him into it. A tale of unrequited love involving a cynical femme fatale; a friendship which turns sour and is then reclaimed; a father-son relationship which starts off in hero-worship but runs into troubled waters; and a hoodlum who... Let’s start with the good stuff. You’ve got a nice concept here: a kindergarten sleuth who inhabits his own world but pulls everyone around him into it. A tale of unrequited love involving a cynical femme fatale; a friendship which turns sour and is then reclaimed; a father-son relationship which starts off in hero-worship but runs into troubled waters; and a hoodlum who turns out to be Mr Nice Guy after all. All of these ingredients are familiar enough to movie-goers, but set within the parameters of five-year-old make-believe games they provide a promising mixture.
That said, it’s by no means an easy task to write this sort of story. You have to get the tone right and it has to be funny. It’s a detective story but violence is pretty much out of the question if your characters are five - six years old and you’re aiming for the family film market. Sex is a no-no. Strong language isn’t appropriate. To add to all those obstacles, you’re playing for comedy. Comedy’s very difficult to write at the best of times because everyone’s taste is different. When you pile on a whole raft of other restrictions, it’s not going to be an easy ride. I suppose the watchword is that to get the laughs you have to play it deadpan. The characters have to look and sound exactly like detectives / femme fatales / hoodlums, etc and they have to take themselves very seriously. So a lot of the comedy is going to be visual - Rocky blowing bubbles instead of smoking cigarillos, a Hopscotch challenge instead of a knife-fight. But the only tools we have for showing visual comedy are the printed words we use in a screenplay. Not easy!
I suppose the obvious benchmark to use for this sort of thing is ‘Bugsy Malone’, which was very successful. But that film is a musical, which puts it in a different idiom. The basic premise is also significantly different, in that the children in ‘Bugsy’ are actually playing grown-up parts, whereas in your story it remains make-believe.
I think you’ve made a great attempt at this, but after the initial comical idea of the baby detective has been set up (and you do that skilfully), I didn’t really feel that the comedy was coming through. To be fair, I’m sure a lot of this would play better visually on screen. But my main concern is that ultimately the storyline is too thin to carry the weight. A lot of the script feels as if it’s been padded out to reach 90+ pages. Now I must confess that I’ve never actually seen Bugsy Malone, but I believe there’s a lot more going on in the story than a group of kids falling out over the theft of a necklace. And that’s possibly where you need to reconsider things. At the moment it seems like everything’s centred on what happens inside one little classroom, whereas there would be a lot more energy in the story if the kids were placed in other environments - the streets, a football game, a night club, a hairdressers, whatever.
I’m not convinced about the use of Rocky’s voice-over throughout the script. A lot of the time it doesn’t seem to be contributing anything we don’t already know, as for instance: ‘It's like my whole world is crumbling around me. First the news with my dad, then I find out my best friend has betrayed me and I have lost the girl of my dreams.’ We already know all this. Also, I assume that it remains as ‘a deep, grizzly, adult voice’ throughout the story, which hints that we’re actually listening to a grown-up version of Rocky in later life. Not sure if that works...
Please remember these are just my personal reactions. Like I say, comedy is very much a matter of taste, and your star rating looks quite good, so maybe it’s just me.
Other reading notes:
1 Set in Black and White with small amounts of color mixed in.
Does this apply to the whole film, or just the opening sequence? There’s no indication.
8 I don’t think the roll-call of names for the whole class serves a useful purpose. Maybe just pick out one or two who have speaking parts.
16 MITCH (V.O.)
I think the V.O. isn’t strictly correct - should be (filtered), or alternatively use INTERCUT and switch back and forth between Rocky and Mitch.
25 I wouldn’t think you’d want to show the whole Hopscotch challenge; it would take up too much screen time. You can just show highlights, building up the tension.
35 The last place left is by stinky Dave.
If Dave’s stinkiness is a plot requirement I think you need to set it up somehow; show or hint at it earlier.
Is a whole class of children allowed to take a communal nap as part of their school day? I’m sure it doesn’t happen in Britain but it may be different in Chicago. And the schoolteacher isn’t allowed to leave her class unattended - especially not to take a personal phone call!
36 It would be difficult to show enough visible detail for what you need here, through a ‘pebble-glass’ window. I’d think a more viable option would be to show close ups of a HAND rummaging around, pulling out the NECKLACE, etc. while we can see the rest of the class asleep.
52 Are the POVs necessary?
59-60 This section feels very much like padding.
61 This exchange doesn’t seem to make sense. ‘I guess if I were you I'd think the same thing’ is a straight statement, so why would Rocky reply, ‘What's that supposed to mean?’
65 Rocky and Mitch make up. Again, the story seems a bit thin here. Their fall-out should be a major obstacle - but after a short period they just decide to be friends again.
67-68 The montage of Rocky and Mitch having good times seems out of place here - there’s no obvious lead-in to it.
68 Why is Christopher still studying if he’s been turned down for promotion? Indeed this plotline feels unresolved - there should be some sort of happy ending for Christopher’s ambitions, but there isn’t.
81 Wow, you must have really wanted a moment alone with me.
This line appears three times. Maybe you need to look at the structure of the sequence with the radio mike - it doesn’t seem to flow smoothly.
Typos, punctuation, grammar, etc. Where you see MULT.(iple) it’s an issue that occurs several times:
1 The streets come to life.
1 . . . perfectly pressed blue police uniform, a burn scar on his neck, sits behind. . .
1 ... backup's on its way. MULT.
1 Christopher puts the radio down, gets a steely look. . .
2 . . .a near empty kid’s bottle of milk...
3 ...middle class, likable, . . . and ready for the day, pops in.
8 Kindergarten’s own supermodel.
8 ...a moment’s glance.
10 He coolly kicks his legs...
10 She melts, going gaga...
11 Wait, it is potatoes?
13 He hops on it and pedals...
13 Bobby's tire runs over the jump rope and he tumbles off...
14 That was very impressive, you two.
15 ... and unholsters his two squirt guns.
18 How was your day, sweetie? MULT.
19 ... on his way up the stairs.
20 Lance coolly struts away.
21 ... sticks his tongue out...
24 ... tosses his pebble on the #1 square.
31 But he couldn’t care less. MULT.
31 Right after my second birthday he came upon ...
36 ... creeps back to the mats...
37 I hope that's all they’re doing.
43 You guys are my heroes!
53 What are you talking about? I just got here.
53 ... two champagne glasses in hand.
60 ... like you've been through the wringer.
70 ...none too pleased...
72 VALLERY (angrily)
86 But, I gave this to you.
87 Vallery looks on, stomps her feet...
89 Don't ‘but mom’ me.
91 Lance stands in front...
That’s all from me. Hope some of these notes are useful, and good luck with it. read
A review of World On A String -graphic draftby Rfordyce on 05/23/2014‘World on a String’ is certainly one of the most ambitious scripts I’ve read on TS. Everything about it is on a massive scale. The concept hinges on nothing less than the possible destruction of not just one nation, not just the population of Planet Earth, but the possible demise of our whole solar system. Set in the distant future, your story creates a complete sci-fi realisation... ‘World on a String’ is certainly one of the most ambitious scripts I’ve read on TS. Everything about it is on a massive scale. The concept hinges on nothing less than the possible destruction of not just one nation, not just the population of Planet Earth, but the possible demise of our whole solar system. Set in the distant future, your story creates a complete sci-fi realisation of a possible environment and our state of being in a world yet to come. The story is bold and action-packed; the characters are vivid, and your language tries, in lyrical style, to describe unfamiliar and challenging ideas. For ambition alone, you deserve top score. You’ve put a ton of work into this, and for that you should be applauded. Few spec writers would take on such a hefty project. I’m sure you realise that this would cost megabucks to finance, so getting it past a studio reader would be the greatest challenge.
For all its ambition however I find it a very difficult read. I’m not sure what you’re expecting in terms of feedback. You obviously know your way around screenplay conventions (I had a quick look at your other submissions) so you must be aware that what you’ve uploaded here is in the style of a shooting script rather than a reader’s script. I suppose that the tag of ‘Graphic Draft’ which you’ve assigned is a hint in this direction. But I’m a bit puzzled about why you’d upload a shooting script, which normally only comes into play after (1) a producer has optioned the script (2) it’s been dismantled and reassembled numerous times to make it production-ready (3) actors, crew and locations have been painfully assembled, and (4) funding for zillions of dollars has been sourced. I’m assuming that this is still a spec script (if not, then congratulations, because dammit, you’re well on the way to being very wealthy!) so your prime concern is to get a thumbs-up from any reader who exerts some sort of influence.
In its present state that would be very difficult. Quite apart from the megabucks required, the fact that you’re trying to describe a very unfamiliar sci-fi environment, coupled with numerous camera directions, VOs, PRE-LAPs, CHAN/CALL conventions, FINDs, etc makes it a bit of a slog for the average reader (and I’m definitely one of those). Just a couple of examples, from early in the script:
Page 4 Why is Rabaan’s face hidden from us the first time we hear him? It makes things confusing for the audience and nothing seems to be gained by it. Indeed it’s not obvious to the audience that Rabaan is Chan’s son. You imply this for the reader, because you give Rabaan the same surname JAREL in your description lines. But the cinema audience, whom you’re ultimately telling the story to, can’t see the description lines; you have to convey information to them by some other means. This is an issue that occurs throughout the script.
Pages 7-9 I find the VOs in this sequence confusing, especially with other VOICES also included in the dialogue. I spent a lot of time trying to figure out who was talking to whom, and where. Now, I quite agree that if it ever got into production, a director may well choose to film it as you’ve written it; but on the page it just adds layers of unnecessary complexity. In a spec script I think you’d be much better just to show a montage of Nico searching among the garbage; immediately followed by the scene in the warehouse with Nico and August. How a director then chooses to film it is their decision.
In terms of storyline, I have to admit that a lot of the plot doesn’t quite make sense to me. I’m not sure how the Apex developed the powers which they possess, which basically seem to derive from their crowns (or is it circlets? – you seem to use the terms haphazardly). We’re told that Gabriel ‘made the first crown’ but what was his motivation? Why is he hibernating in a cryo-tank anyway? And if that’s part of his master-plan, why does he seem so surprised at everything that happens to him?
Where has the ‘Brain’ come from? Has it been engineered by Gabriel, or mankind, or has it evolved differently? Who or what are the ‘Golden Eyes?’ Whose will are they obeying? Gabriel’s? The Titans? I don’t know where the Titans have come from, or indeed what their intentions are: do they simply cruise the universe chomping up planets at random, or do they have a deeper raison d’etre? Who or what is the ultimate villain in this story? I know that to a large extent the antagonist is mankind itself, enmeshed in constant war, avarice and petty ambition. But as it stands (and no doubt I’ve missed clues along the way, so apologies in advance) the central conflict in this story seems a bit fragmented.
Much of the description, especially in the vital opening sequences, is difficult for the reader to visualise. I realise this is a common stumbling block in sci-fi scripts, and a reader should make allowances for it, but then, you also need to make life a little easier for the reader. Just a few examples:
‘Bright lettering and videos smother the world, facing inward. Sky ads for the people on the surface.’
Difficult to visualise.
What do you mean by an ‘Orbital Castle?’
‘A crown of gold alloy and gorilla glass.’
I wasn’t familiar with the term ‘gorilla glass.’ I am now, having researched it, but again, difficult to visualise.
‘…on a purple-lit FLYER with the top down…’
Needs more detail. Just calling something a ‘flyer’ doesn’t give us much to go on.
‘A high ceiling above and Earth’s wild skylights open underneath.’
What’s a skylight?
‘A laser from Chan’s flyer erases the face of a man we’ll come to know as Gabriel.’
Very difficult to follow what’s going on here. Does the face belong to the statue? Or is it somewhere else? And it belongs to a character we haven’t even seen yet?
‘INT. GABRIEL’S SHIP - PLANET HIGHWAY – DAY’
What’s Planet Highway – the name of the ship? Or something else?
Then there’s the matter of:
I’m sure you know what’s meant by unfilmables. Things a writer puts on paper which are difficult, or impossible, for a director to show on screen, e.g. – thoughts running through someone’s mind; exposition which is simply written in your description rather than in action or dialogue on screen, etc. We all try to get away with them, and sometimes we succeed, but if they proliferate it can feel as if we’re reading a novel, not a screenplay. Examples:
6 Gabriel survived a lifetime to see what’s laid out in front of him through that window.
24 Leetz puts a hand on Chan’s shoulder. His face says what he dares not to say out loud. This is why we can’t trust them.
20 And for the first time, Nico is seeing an Apex act like a person and not a god.
45 Payche, eyes closed, agonizing, still processing what happened to Rabaan.
57 Nico scoots over a seat, wondering if that was Rabaan’s chair or something.
64 He’s been genuinely lonely out here.
There are plenty more, but I don’t want to labour the point.
Other reading notes:
3 It’s addressed to us by name. And to Qel.
There’s a problem with the character Qel. He’s referred to several times in the story, and is obviously important to the plot, but we never actually see him. It’s just my personal opinion, but I think there’s always a risk with that scenario because the audience subconsciously expects to meet the character at some point, and feel vaguely cheated when they don’t. I assume that Qel was Payche’s father but this isn’t made absolutely clear.
Put your crown on. You people are impossible to get a hold of.
Who does he mean by ‘You people?’
18 She kicks an invisible MUTE BOX-- ???
26 Where’s the poor fuck with Rabaan’s circlet?
Crown or circlet? Is there a difference?
63 Payche and Nico have to dodge a barrage of artillery fire. But where’s it coming from? I thought Yeree and the workers on the Moon were friendly?
64 Payche smiles sadly at his condition and embraces her brother.
Yeree is her brother? I thought he was Leetz’s son?
How is Rabaan?
Not sure if the meaning of ‘sotto’ is widely understood.
126 It takes Rabaan a second to recognize the brother he hasn’t seen in so many years.
Yeree and Rabaan are brothers?
Grammar, punctuation, etc:
Fairly clean. Just a couple of annoying habits (?!*)…
a. The ubiquitous OFF OF, e.g. – 2 ‘He drags his crown off of the counter.’ You don’t need the second ‘of.’
b. Missing commas, especially before a name, e.g. –
5 ...it can be dangerous, Rabaan.
27 Nico’s eyes flick from Apex to Apex...
32 I need to see whose side you’re on.
44 He’s no Hunter.
47 That’s the brain, isn’t it?
49 Leetz’s catwalk abruptly drops to Nico’s level and he swaggers over.
49 Let the boy train first, Leetz.
56 ..and the little robot unfolds…
59 Payche slides the hatch open…
69 Though you’re becoming less and less useful.
Connor, you probably think I’m being hyper-critical here, and maybe you’re right. There’s a terrific story to be told here, But I think you need to do some serious work to mould it into a form which can be industry-ready. Then all you need to do is persuade somebody to finance it! But congratulations on making the attempt, and I wish you well with it. read
Copyright © 2001-2014 Trigger Street Labs. All Rights Reserved.