Pick your Poison
Right away in the first scene i have to read something twice: when you have Walter entering the conference room for the second time, there is nothing to indicate that this is a short moment later. I don't think you need any scene outside the conference room at all. Just have Walter repeatedly entering the conference room. The receptionists' dialogue doesn't do anything for the story but take up space on the page.
Not sure what makes Luther instinctively choose to hide when he sees the heavies coming in. these are obviously not people he's seen before, and come to think of it, why do they kick the door in if they've really come for his services?
I'm b eginning to see a repeating pattern of narrative/scene headings that makes things less than clear. The following brief scene illustrates what I mean.
INT. MAIN OFFICE
Luther stops at the front entrance.
(MOMENTS LATER in the scene heading would be helpful here, also because you don't mention that the heavies or Victor are with Luther, I wonder: is he now alone? Have the heavies left? Did he shoot them all?)
LUTHER
Walter!
Walter's head appears.(where does his head appear from?)
LUTHER (CONT'D)
There's a length of chain in the
maintenance closet. Make sure the
doors are secure before you leave.
Luther goes out with the Heavies.
It isn't until the last sentence that I'm able to put any context on this brief scene, and by then I've already read most of it twice to figure out what's happening. Professional script readers don't like to do this. Additionally it's an unnecessary scene. Why not just cut to the drive up the mountains?
All femmes are fatale. Beautiful.
The discussion between Yarmouth and Luther: for as little information it provides for the story it is much too long.* It's essentially three full pages of dialogue that could probably be trimmed to one if only the essential stuff is kept. I would expect a conversation like this between two men who don't know each other in a situation like this to be brief and direct anyway.
*ditto for the conversation in the limo between Jordin and Luther.
I'm on page 43 now and there is not much going on. I would have expected to see more theatrical elements introduced by now. Intrigue, suspense, some action. This should be a puzzle with many pieces: Where are the attempts on his life by an unknown assasin? Where is the romantic involvement between him and the smorgasbord of daughters available for him to choose from (my God, you make this guy Luther more than just sexually repressed, he's got to be neutered). What is this guy Victor really up to? What does he have to gain by Spider's death? Tell me whether the Fabrinis benefit or suffer when Spider dies. At this point in the script you should have a boat-load of unanswered questions; known pieces of a puzzle that don't fit anywhere yet; clues; innuendo; misinformation.
Instead of filling pages with clever banter that doesn't move your story forward or reveal pertinent information, introduce an intriguing subplot; a new twist; a new suspect; a car chase, whatever.
The following is a slight formatting error.
LUTHER
(overlap)
I have a question.
LUTHER(V.O.)
I have a question.
Is the proper format (stands for Voice over).
LUTHER
I like agony. It's always been
there for me.-- awesome.
You have good dialogue in that it is clever, often funny, sometimes insightful. You have a good feel for presentation, flow.
Overall, there were many things I liked about the bigger picture of your script. The reveal about Jordin not being his daughter, Yarmouth her father. That Jordin is not actually dead; the reunion scene between them is understated and well executed. I like the whole concept very much. It's ripe with possibilities for suspenseful drama/intrigue, especially with the extreme characters you've made the sisters into. The problem is, as i've stated before, there just isn't enough dramatic action for me to sink my teeth into. To be honest, in the end it became an exercise in turning pages to find the answer to the only plot point: who's trying to kill Spider and why? Jordin's subplot does add another element to the story but it appears way late.
This is the most common criticism I have of scripts on TS, and make no mistake, I've heard it about my work a few times as well. As always feel free to contact me about any of my comments.
Other Reviews by joxyjoxyjoxy
68
-
Right out the gate, 137 pages is way, way, way, too long, especially for a comedy. I seriously considered dropping the assignment when I saw that but figured too many others would, too, and you wouldn't get any reviews. 95 pgs MAX for a comedy.
I've notice a consistent lack of clarity in the narrative making it difficult for the reader to ascertain what's happening. For...
Right out the gate, 137 pages is way, way, way, too long, especially for a comedy. I seriously considered dropping the assignment when I saw that but figured too many others would, too, and you wouldn't get any reviews. 95 pgs MAX for a comedy.
I've notice a consistent lack of clarity in the narrative making it difficult for the reader to ascertain what's happening. For ex:
Suddenly, the car swerves towards the two, they stumble and
fall. A leg snaps off the dresser.
In this sequence, I wasn't sure if the car hit them, just missed them or what. They stumble trying to get out of the way? And does the leg snap off the dresser because they dropped it? Does the car hit it?
Finally, the little black car stops. It smashes into a BIKE
RACK. The sound echoes across the street. It catches the
attention of DICK TIMPY, 40’s, every lawyer you have ever
hated.
Dick speaks to his secretary in his vulture like manner.
DICK TIMPY
That's a client waiting to happen.
Where's that idiot trainer with my
riding cycle?
Here, it's not clear where Dick is. You have EXT. in the scene heading but he's talking to his secretary, who isn't mentioned again in the scene. Is he standing on the sidewalk? And if there is no secretary, is he possibly talking on his phone???
speed is causing her front tire to wobble.
The two cyclists rapidly approach a parked 18-wheeler.
The moving truck is currently in the process of being
hijacked.
In the 18-wheelers cab, there are two men hog-tied in their
boxers.
Behind, in the semi's trailer, are the Italians. The awkward
assailants happened to be stuck inside and are trying to ram
the heavy doors back open.
Wilson approaches the semi and veers left. The lawyer goes
right.
Side by side, they gather steady speed down the hill.
The two Italians are beating on the semi’s double-hinged
doors.
This whole sequence is really confusing. You can't just write 'In the 18-wheelers cab, there are two men hog-tied in their
boxers. Behind, in the semi's trailer, are the Italians. The awkward
assailants happened to be stuck inside and are trying to ram
the heavy doors back open.' without creating a new scene heading such as INT. SEMI-TRAILER – CONTINUOUS. Also this is poorly written from a sequential standpoint. You have way, way too much happening with the Italians in the very brief amount of time it takes the bikers to pass them.
FRITZ
(ashamed)
Oh, same old crap, just doing the
fucking mail. Dealing with nothing
but impatient fuckers. Don't worry
you little asshole, you're going to
get your fucking Grandma’s
Christmas present. It's that and
the piece of shit dogs. If I had a
dollar for every time I stepped in
a pile of dog shit, I'd be Richie
fucking Rich!
This is just one of many dialogue blocks that are way too thick. What is all that about Grandma's Christmas present? All you have to do is flip through the pages of a produced script and you will find very, very few dialogue blocks like this one.
P. 15 and there is absolutely nothing happening to move this story forward. So far all we have seen is a series of (thus far) unrelated events, none of which have added any dramatic action to the script. Your first ten pages are the most important. Something's gotta happen in them.
This scene was really funny:
Change hangs up.
The next thing Change feels is a powerful force that grabs
him by his head. It’s LUTHER, with a cell in one hand, and
Change's face in another.
Whoa, dude, seriously, ass-licking? Really? I know there's some unwritten rule about having a mandatory over-the-top gay scene in every comedy now, but there is nothing funny about a guy licking another guy's ass. Nothing.
EARTH
Nice meeting you all, man! We ran
out of gas, about a mile back.
Where were you guys headed?
SAPHIRE
To the Phish concert..
ROACH, 20’s, not the kind you smoke, more like the kind you
spray with Raid.
ROACH
Yeah, and they're finally doing a
free gig.
ZEN
Yes, then we'll start our homage to
hear our inner voice.
SAPHIRE
In the sounds of the waves crashing
on shore.
ROACH
(To Earth)
What you got in the bag?
EARTH
Oh, just some munchies and stuff.
Hey, you guys want a pork rind.
ROACH
Sure dude!
Roach carelessly grabs a large handful, spilling some.
SAPHIRE
Fantasy Meadow is Vegan and
Vegetarian.
ZEN
Also, she remains in trance right
now.
SAPHIRE
We were just about to start ritual.
ZEN
Would you two like to harmonize?
EARTH
Yeah, right on man.
ZEN
And now the incense…. Companion
Saphire...
64
I printed out this entire page of dialogue to illustrate just one of many pages that does zero for the story; what I mean is, none of it introduces any dramatic action to the story; it doesn't move it forward, it doesn't put any unanswered questions into people's minds, nor does it reveal anything. Every block of dialogue, every word is precious. You're really asking a lot of your reader. It's hard enough for some shmuck like me on TS to get through it. No way a professional reader or producer would at this length.
There are some comedic moments in this script and I applaud your varied choice of characters but there there is way too little story told with way too many words here. This is, however, something I say about 95% of scripts on TS. Sorry to be so negative, just being honest. Hope some of it helps.
read
-
There's not much missing from this script. One of the best I've read on TS. Many truly funny moments. Here are my thoughts. Hope some of them help.
Screaming sequence where Tru meets Oscar: hilarious. A little Austin Powers but well executed, but I think it best to end it with Oscar staring at his nail. The second scene is stretching out the comedic value too far, unless...
There's not much missing from this script. One of the best I've read on TS. Many truly funny moments. Here are my thoughts. Hope some of them help.
Screaming sequence where Tru meets Oscar: hilarious. A little Austin Powers but well executed, but I think it best to end it with Oscar staring at his nail. The second scene is stretching out the comedic value too far, unless you add another comedic element to it such as a time lapse where the sun moves through the sky as she screams until its late afternoon before she stops. Maybe Oscar is sleeping when her voice gives out and she has to kick him to wake him up. And her voice is so wrenched she has to say 'Please don't eat me three times before he understands. Maybe she has to 'mime' it out like charades. Just spitballin.
NARRATOR
In fact - Daphne was only trying to scare
Tru. The witches had gone over to a
strict vegetarian diet in their early
twenties after prognosticating their own
early deaths from Cardio Pulmonary
Disease.
This is hilarious.
Ditto with the negotiation over the peas, five vs. three.
In fact, love the witches. They're cracking me up. Don't get why Tru screams PLEASE DON'T EAT ME! Could be a python-esque reaction perhaps?
A twenty mattress princess? Holy crap, that's funny. If that's your own concept, congrats. That's freakin clever. You got me to laugh out loud when her face was getting crushed. Nice finish on the joke with the wedding scene.
Love the homage to Daffy Duck:
CECIL
(SHOUTING)
HA-HA! GUARD! TURN! PARRY! DODGE! SPIN!
HA! THRUST!
Humanitas. Good word.
CECIL
She’s not my...
(Bob not listening continues
his list)
She’s not my-
kind of a trivial thing but if Bob is still talking here what he's saying must be in a dialogue box.
NARRATOR
“What if she rejected him?” He wondered.
What if he confessed his feelings to Tru
and she laughed in his face - How would
that failure, make him feel? And in
front of his proud brother? “No,” he
thought. “I can’t let Bob see me fail.”
One of the few issues I found was the author's tendency to hit things right on the nose (see above). Ditto for the rest of the NARRATOR'S dialogue over this scene. It's just giving the play by play when there are other ways to allow the audience to infer what Cecil's doing and why. There were several instances of this throughout, mostly by the narrator.
By the way, great twist allowing Tru to hear what he's saying to his brother.
NARRATOR
Cecil did not - and neither do we -
because it’s way too sad and
heartbreaking and really doesn’t pertain
to our main story.
Another critical comment, and I alluded to this before, there are a few moments like this that I felt were overextended. Better here to just end after 'neither do we.'
P72: Tru screams at the troll. Maybe play off the scene where she meets Oscar and have her scream repeatedly again? Just a thought.
BRIDGE TROLL
G-O-O-O-L-L-D-D!!!
small technical matter: when you hyphen between caps like this it means the character is spelling out the word.
NOTE: The harp CANNOT actually sing or play itself - that’s a
lie made up by Jack. This is all just a poor CARNIVAL TRICK
he uses to sell his story and entertain his patrons. A side
stage shot reveals an UGLY MAN behind a curtain playing
another LARGER HARP. JACK’S MOM stands next to the Ugly Man
and SINGS into a MEGAPHONE. So to the audience the Harp
appears to be playing and singing on its own.
Don't write this in a NOTE. Just make it part of the regular narrative.
My last critical observation is that a lot of the characters sound alike with the exception of Jack (accent) and Bob Charming (bullshit). I struggle with this, too. Don't have much advice for you here on how to overcome this.
Good luck with the script. Hope some of my comments were helpful.
read
-
I liked the concept behind this script, but I found it a little thin in a few areas.
My first observation is one I make with nearly every script I read on TS and that is there just isn't enough story here. We need more plot twists (maybe one of them is in cahoots with Jimmy) there's no inciting incident and we need more dramatic action and less of them arguing with each...
I liked the concept behind this script, but I found it a little thin in a few areas.
My first observation is one I make with nearly every script I read on TS and that is there just isn't enough story here. We need more plot twists (maybe one of them is in cahoots with Jimmy) there's no inciting incident and we need more dramatic action and less of them arguing with each other. Tyson's snakebite is the only real crisis they face until it all comes unglued.
Definintely need more backstory on Ouichange, what it is, how it's going to change the world. What are these WE's, and what and how do they do what they do? Take a look at the movie EAGLE EYE. They do a thorough job of explaining the mechanics of their futuristic system by weaving into the plot.
The third act is way too dialog heavy. It's almost 3 solid pages of Alex and big dialog blocks. Which brings me to another issue common to TS scripts: dialog needs to be crisper throughout, and you never need to make a point more than once. When Jimmy leg-sweeped Kruesen, he kind of went on and on about his rules and such when a simple smile and 'let's move along, shall we?' would have said so much more.
When I use the word thin, I guess i'm trying to express an overall lack of context within which to interpret elements of the story. I know nothing about the character's themselves, even Alex, the protagonist.
We know or find out virtually nothing about Jimmy other than he works for people that don't like Ouichange. But because we don't know what Ouichange is it's hard for me to extrapolate who might be trying to kill them.
A minor formatting issue: you don't need to start each sentence in your action narrative on a new line.
2 examples of no-no's in screenwriting.
Muddy Waters’ “Hoochie Koochie Man” plays soundtrack to
Jimmy’s journey back to the coffee shop. It is the rhythm in
his head, the blues in his soul, the thrust in his groin and
the rod in his backbone
Jimmy walks across the lobby, every step an assertion of his
right to be in the world.
First, you can only write what you see and what you hear. 'the blues in his soul', 'an assertion of his right to be in this world' are ethereal things.
Using specific songs or even artists in spec scripts is also frowned upon, mostly for legal and directorial discretion reasons.
Good luck with the script. Hope my comments were helpful. Not meant to be harmful.
read
+ more reviews