LIke so many films on trigger street, there's a lack of thought in the production design. So much of filmmaking lies in the environments you choose to shoot in, and most people shoot in extremely uninteresting ones. This film is no exception. Worse yet, the film has a "supernatural" character which isn't effective because it isn't carried out well through lighting, production...LIke so many films on trigger street, there's a lack of thought in the production design. So much of filmmaking lies in the environments you choose to shoot in, and most people shoot in extremely uninteresting ones. This film is no exception. Worse yet, the film has a "supernatural" character which isn't effective because it isn't carried out well through lighting, production design, or camera direction. Rather than spooky, or spiritual, we, the audience, get something unconvincing and somewhat silly. The story is interesting, especially the main character's predicament, but the voice-over and lack luster production values bury it. Voice-over is tricky. It has to add to the text of the film without overwhelming it with redundancy or hijacking the film's visual value. Unfortunately, this film is guilty on both counts. Plus, the voice-over simply doesn't sound informal or intimate enough. It all sounds very written.read
After a promising opening sequence, the film quickly droops into the mundane trap of a lack of production design. The apartment is ugly and photographed in a very uninteresting way. The acting feels forced and unassured with the two female leads. The male lead is better, but not good enough to make this film effective. Also lacking in the film is any kind of real human...After a promising opening sequence, the film quickly droops into the mundane trap of a lack of production design. The apartment is ugly and photographed in a very uninteresting way. The acting feels forced and unassured with the two female leads. The male lead is better, but not good enough to make this film effective. Also lacking in the film is any kind of real human interaction. First off, the way that person interfaces with her laptop makes no sense whatsoever. People are very familiar with how they use their computers, and the way this character uses it is baffling. Worse yet, the characters never really seem to be interacting. Just a series of poorly written monologues, which aren't all that interesting, and someone watching them and commenting on them. Drama lies in characters affecting, or trying to affect, other characters. Here we only have a bunch of talking heads.read
The theme of your film is interesting. I understand what it is you are trying to say. Unfortunately, by having your character so immersed in an electronic media driven world that he eventually begins to believe the events outside his window can be changed by pushing a button on his television remote, you bend truth to its breaking point, losing the viewer to disbelief. I...The theme of your film is interesting. I understand what it is you are trying to say. Unfortunately, by having your character so immersed in an electronic media driven world that he eventually begins to believe the events outside his window can be changed by pushing a button on his television remote, you bend truth to its breaking point, losing the viewer to disbelief. I suppose, in a film with such a subtle introduction to this character, the broad narrative stroke of having the main character try to change the war in the real world with the flick of his remote switch is too much. Overall, the filmmaking was good. You might want to think more about production design in your future projects. Even realistic environments have to be visually compelling, even if they're supposed to be mundane.read
LIke so many films on trigger street, there's a lack of thought in the production design. So much of filmmaking lies in the environments you choose to shoot in, and most people shoot in extremely uninteresting ones. This film is no exception. Worse yet, the film has a "supernatural" character which isn't effective because it isn't carried out well through lighting, production...LIke so many films on trigger street, there's a lack of thought in the production design. So much of filmmaking lies in the environments you choose to shoot in, and most people shoot in extremely uninteresting ones. This film is no exception. Worse yet, the film has a "supernatural" character which isn't effective because it isn't carried out well through lighting, production design, or camera direction. Rather than spooky, or spiritual, we, the audience, get something unconvincing and somewhat silly. The story is interesting, especially the main character's predicament, but the voice-over and lack luster production values bury it. Voice-over is tricky. It has to add to the text of the film without overwhelming it with redundancy or hijacking the film's visual value. Unfortunately, this film is guilty on both counts. Plus, the voice-over simply doesn't sound informal or intimate enough. It all sounds very written.read
After a promising opening sequence, the film quickly droops into the mundane trap of a lack of production design. The apartment is ugly and photographed in a very uninteresting way. The acting feels forced and unassured with the two female leads. The male lead is better, but not good enough to make this film effective. Also lacking in the film is any kind of real human...After a promising opening sequence, the film quickly droops into the mundane trap of a lack of production design. The apartment is ugly and photographed in a very uninteresting way. The acting feels forced and unassured with the two female leads. The male lead is better, but not good enough to make this film effective. Also lacking in the film is any kind of real human interaction. First off, the way that person interfaces with her laptop makes no sense whatsoever. People are very familiar with how they use their computers, and the way this character uses it is baffling. Worse yet, the characters never really seem to be interacting. Just a series of poorly written monologues, which aren't all that interesting, and someone watching them and commenting on them. Drama lies in characters affecting, or trying to affect, other characters. Here we only have a bunch of talking heads.read
The theme of your film is interesting. I understand what it is you are trying to say. Unfortunately, by having your character so immersed in an electronic media driven world that he eventually begins to believe the events outside his window can be changed by pushing a button on his television remote, you bend truth to its breaking point, losing the viewer to disbelief. I...The theme of your film is interesting. I understand what it is you are trying to say. Unfortunately, by having your character so immersed in an electronic media driven world that he eventually begins to believe the events outside his window can be changed by pushing a button on his television remote, you bend truth to its breaking point, losing the viewer to disbelief. I suppose, in a film with such a subtle introduction to this character, the broad narrative stroke of having the main character try to change the war in the real world with the flick of his remote switch is too much. Overall, the filmmaking was good. You might want to think more about production design in your future projects. Even realistic environments have to be visually compelling, even if they're supposed to be mundane.read
the movie is about regret, and the theme as well as the basic story work well together. while the dialogue is a bit clunky at times in what are supposed to be, for the most part, casual scenes, the fact that the regret at hand in this character's life is something as shallow as telling a stupid lie about a girl he hardly even knew, greatly diminishes the effectiveness of the...the movie is about regret, and the theme as well as the basic story work well together. while the dialogue is a bit clunky at times in what are supposed to be, for the most part, casual scenes, the fact that the regret at hand in this character's life is something as shallow as telling a stupid lie about a girl he hardly even knew, greatly diminishes the effectiveness of the narrative. If she had been a former girlfriend he had wronged, someone he was extremely close to and could have seen himself marrying if he hadn't made a bad choice in his youth with far reachign consequences, then the film would have been extremely effective. Instead, it's tantamount to a guy asking a girl out in a bar, and getting shut down. No big loss because there's no real hope of winning in the first place.read
I may be really imperceptive, but I just can't figure out what happens in this film. What is the narrative? What is the arc? I thought the editing of the film was interesting and certainly infused the film with an unsettling tone. But I thought the compositions were a bit plain and banal. They failed to work in concert with the editing. Reading the synopsis, I realize...I may be really imperceptive, but I just can't figure out what happens in this film. What is the narrative? What is the arc? I thought the editing of the film was interesting and certainly infused the film with an unsettling tone. But I thought the compositions were a bit plain and banal. They failed to work in concert with the editing. Reading the synopsis, I realize you were going for a bright/sunny haunted film, and as noble an attempt that is for originality, it's one doomed to failure. Bright can be scary, but bright and sunny? The shining was bright, but it was never sunny. The lighting in this short simply doens't do the trick.read
Neat subject. The only problem is there isn't enough direction going on. The dot people aren't properly introduced at the beginning. We get a montage of what they "do," but we never get introduced to the identities of the oddballs behind the dots. The conflict is fairly well presented, although, it perhaps takes a little too long. Too much of different interviewees saying...Neat subject. The only problem is there isn't enough direction going on. The dot people aren't properly introduced at the beginning. We get a montage of what they "do," but we never get introduced to the identities of the oddballs behind the dots. The conflict is fairly well presented, although, it perhaps takes a little too long. Too much of different interviewees saying the same thing. Also, the documentary doesn't really take on much of a personality itself, which would have helped quite a bit since the actual subject fairly inconsequential. The Daily Show, for instance, would tackle a silly story like this and add it's own sarcastic perspective on it because the story itself, though truthful, really isn't all that involving. Tighten up the structure, include a real introduction to the "characters," maybe add some commentary or narrative voice over/intertitles, truncate most of the sequences, and you should have a killer documentary.read
The film's central performance, the voice of the woman on the answering machine works extremely well. This condensed progression of one woman's obsession, loss, and hopelessness is very effective. I only wish there were a visual component to go along with it. I understand the filmmaker was going for something minimal. But the single take shot you use isn't evocative of...The film's central performance, the voice of the woman on the answering machine works extremely well. This condensed progression of one woman's obsession, loss, and hopelessness is very effective. I only wish there were a visual component to go along with it. I understand the filmmaker was going for something minimal. But the single take shot you use isn't evocative of anything. You could have taken away the visual component completely and still be as successful with the material as you are now. I suppose, as a viewer, I was yearning some kind of visual component that would mirror or counterpoint the emotional progression of the woman on the answering machine. It doesn't have to be something obvious. In fact, I think, if you were to rethink your visual approach, you'll find there's a real opporunity here to magnify the emotional pull of your film ten fold.read
It's really difficult when a filmmaker centers their film on something as subtle and familiar as a conversation between lovers. Unfortunately, the filmmaker of this short wasn't up to the challenge. None of the interactions between these couples ever felt remotely real. I think the biggest problem was a lack of subtext in the writing. Every character says exactly what they're...It's really difficult when a filmmaker centers their film on something as subtle and familiar as a conversation between lovers. Unfortunately, the filmmaker of this short wasn't up to the challenge. None of the interactions between these couples ever felt remotely real. I think the biggest problem was a lack of subtext in the writing. Every character says exactly what they're thinking, which makes the entire piece feel like a soap opera. None of the scenes are given a chance to truly develop. Everything the writer wants you to know about these character's situations are simply laid out there for all to hear. The acting doesn't help much either, although, I can't imagine any actor being able to overcome the hurtles of this film's dialogue. Good production design and lighting. Plus, the opening credits were neat. You've got that down. Next time spend more time on the writing and directing of the actors.read
I think this film could have been really cute and entertaining. Unfortunately, there was something missing in how the characters interact. You just don't believe they're in the fantastical situation they're in. The writing is probably mostly to blame for this, as well as the acting. Yeah, the whole idea of the voodoo doll is silly, but it could have worked if only the characters...I think this film could have been really cute and entertaining. Unfortunately, there was something missing in how the characters interact. You just don't believe they're in the fantastical situation they're in. The writing is probably mostly to blame for this, as well as the acting. Yeah, the whole idea of the voodoo doll is silly, but it could have worked if only the characters responded to everything more honestly. Further development of what it means to be able to punish those who have wronged you in matters of love would have also allowed the film to achieve some depth. I mean, this film is basically about a person dealing with damaging relationship, and she's angry, but the character doesn't get to discover anything else about herself or change in anyway, which makes the film a missed opportunity to say something about the human condition.read
There's something missing from this film. All the ingredients are in there for a neat short with a twist ending, but this one somehow isn't as effective as I think it could have been. Perhaps, the film didn't delve deep enough into the sexual fantasies of these happily married parents. It felt too tame to be honestly about sex. It would have been much more interesting if...There's something missing from this film. All the ingredients are in there for a neat short with a twist ending, but this one somehow isn't as effective as I think it could have been. Perhaps, the film didn't delve deep enough into the sexual fantasies of these happily married parents. It felt too tame to be honestly about sex. It would have been much more interesting if the fantasy were more involving at the beginning, which, I'm afraid would have required better writing and acting. The viewer needs to believe in the scenario at the beginning. Instead, you're left watching a scenario that feels false. And even though it eventually is revealed as being false, I think the emotions, desires, and obsessions related to a person involved in these types of fantasies would have been better portrayed if those fantasies were more sincerely visualized.read