"I corral the cow while you ride the farmer's daughter."
mlambush
"Come out to the coast, we'll get together, have a few laughs...."...
Bio
"Come out to the coast, we'll get together, have a few laughs...."
Submissions by mlambush
-
a screenplay by mlambushGenres: comedy
A couple's marriage and goals are put to the test by an unexpected bundle of joy.
-
a screenplay by mlambush
A British commando must save an atomic physicist to stop a rogue Nazi general from creating a superweapon.
Reviews by mlambush 228
-
A review of Cruel To Be Kindby mlambush on 05/13/2011Well not this exact script, but dozens of others like it. The semi-autobiographical slice of life set in [high school/college], starring the author's friends or facsimiles of them, [drinking/getting high] in almost every scene, with little to no plot. If I had a dollar for every one of these I've read on Triggerstreet, I wouldn't have to worry about selling my own stuff... Well not this exact script, but dozens of others like it. The semi-autobiographical slice of life set in [high school/college], starring the author's friends or facsimiles of them, [drinking/getting high] in almost every scene, with little to no plot. If I had a dollar for every one of these I've read on Triggerstreet, I wouldn't have to worry about selling my own stuff.
I guess this is what first timers do: write what they know. Unfortunately, what we know usually isn't all that interesting. And I must confess, my first script was very much along these same lines. Of course, I realized how boring my college life was so I added in a magical amulet, machine guns, zombies and ninjas to spice it up. Still, it was very much a "first screenplay" as this one is as well.
I will say this, to your credit, you didn't have any scenes where the characters sit around quoting Tarantino films. That puts this one head and shoulders above the rest. Unfortunately, like those other scripts, you did include the cast of Superbad: Seth (Michael Cera), Kenny (Jonah Hill), and Warren Peace (McLovin).
All this is not to say that you aren't a good writer. There were several bits of greatness in this, I just think that you can do much, much better. Personally, I'd like you to take Ellie out of this script, and put her into her own script, albeit one with a goal, antagonist standing in the way of that goal, climax and resolution. I think you are more than capable of doing this.
Okay, that being said, I have a couple of constructive criticisms for the script as it exists:
1) Why does this take place in 1995? If this story has nothing to say about that time period, there's no reason to make this a period piece and drive up the cost of making it. I was in college the same time as there characters, and there was so much territory unmined here. Where was the malt liquor? After "Boyz N the Hood" every middle class white boy was drinking St. Ides and O.E. Why was someone using a cell phone? No one had cell phones back then, at the most they'd have a pager. Maker's Mark? That's everyone's favorite drink NOW. Why not Jagermeister? Or Zima? Soapnet wasn't around in the mid-90s.
2) What's the logline to this story? The logline pretty much tells me what's going to happen at the end of Act I, and this story didnt have a strong 3 act structure. Knowing what your logline is ahead of time can help you attack the story in a more efficient way. My guess is something like "A college student falls in love with the new girl on campus, creating a love triangle with her and his best friend." That's not the best, but that's basically what's happneing here and where your Act I needs to be. We need to feel the jealousy from Ellie by page 25, and Act II needs to be the rising sexual tension between Seth and Ellie, causing conflict with Allison.
3) Reduce the number of characters in this. Other than Ellie, none of them came across as particularly strong. Seth stands out only because he's your protagonist, but even he could use some work. But by the end, I couldn't tell who was who. Paul, Ian, Chet, Joe? Debbie, Brenda, Kelly? None of them had enough personality to be really distinguishable and several of them just came out of nowhere.
4) I couldn't understand why Seth liked Allison so much, other than she was hot. The ball pit scene at McD's was great, but she was just so bitchy that I couldn't feel the attraction. I liked the whole allusion to the medications earlier on, but why not show that she is really dependent on this things? Like she's on prozac all the time to control her moods (which would also be a good commentary on the 90s), and of course, alcohol mixes poorly with antidepressants. Go deeper into these characters!
5) Why is everyone laughing at their own jokes? So many dialog exchanges end with "They both laugh." Watch a comedy film -- most lines our delivered straight, that's what makes them funny. Characters laughing at their own jokes kills the humor.
6) Coincidentally, I also went to law school after college. Just reading about Civ Pro outlines made me shudder. But this brings up another point -- I was so damn busy that first year I barely had time for friends. But Seth doesn't seem to miss a beat with what's going on with Kenny and the boys. What should happen here is that Seth starts to outgrow his old buddies, thereby causing a rift (and story loving conflict) between he and Kenny.
7) Allison is getting engaged at 20? Not likely.
8) Formatting: Just call her ALLISON from the get-go, no one in the audience is going to have a copy of the script, so no need for surprise. Don't introduce characters in dialog -- use the ALL CAPS only in the action lines, the first time the character appears on screen. Watch your INT.'s and EXT.'s -- they weren't always used correctly.
Well that's about it. Overall, I think you should just chalk this one up to the learning curve and start on your next spec. But if you want to take another stab at this one, it needs a stronger 3-act story with deeper characters and more conflict. Good luck! read -
A review of Sweetheart of the Rodeoby mlambush on 05/04/2011Been a long time since I've read one of your stories, Bob. I have to say with all honesty that this one was probably my favorite. It read quickly, the actions lines were the right length with right amount of attitude, the dialog was really good and there were characters I actually cared about. I am not kidding when I say that I had an emotional moment when Brooks prevailed... Been a long time since I've read one of your stories, Bob. I have to say with all honesty that this one was probably my favorite. It read quickly, the actions lines were the right length with right amount of attitude, the dialog was really good and there were characters I actually cared about. I am not kidding when I say that I had an emotional moment when Brooks prevailed in court -- you did an excellent job setting all that up. And if it reads that well on the page, it will be even better on film.
I don't really have much to offer, so here are what few page notes I had while I read.
p. 6 - EXT. TRUCK? Should probably be EXT. INTERSECTION. The Truck is in the intersection
p. 16 -- Not Padwan warrior. "Padawan learner". The kids know their Star Wars, dude.
p. 25 -- "hearinag" -- hearing
p. 28 -- Scene starting at the bottom of the page, just doesn't feel needed. My one real structure note is that Act I is just a bit too long, and we don't really hit Act II until p. 33 or so. You can probably condense some more in the setup portion of the script.
p. 31 -- When Lacey says "But it's possible?" I think the Doctor should just respond with a look -- he was just testing Brooks' sight on the previous page and now he already has a diagnosis? I think just a look of regret will tell us what we need to know
p. 33 -- I was just thinking it might be nice to make JoJo a quirkier character. You have so many good ones in this script but she could be better
p. 59 -- Period right after the "?"
p. 79 -- JOJO says "JoJo can ride as good as ever..." you mean Brooks, right?
p. 84 -- RE: Earl's speech, I never got that Brooks was all that different. She was the same wisecracking girl she was before she went blind. Earl is the only other character beside JoJo that I think could use some touching up. He seems less well defined than Lacey, Brooks or some of the others.
p. 87 -- BROOKS: "That act gives..." should probably be "That act says...."
p. 90 -- AMY: "My mom, said...." no comma after mom
p. 94 -- The Judge is a great character
p. 96 -- The song is just "I Fought The Law"
p. 96 -- "Father, daughter" should be "father-daughter privilege"
p. 98 -- EXT. ARENA - NIGHT -- I thought the judge set the tryout for 2PM (p. 95)
p. 105 -- Does Amy give up anything but not winning? A scholarship? Money? I'm not sure what's at stake for her other than her mom wants her to win. Maybe we should see her room full of trophies at some point. Or maybe her mom was a sweetheart herself who didnt win. Just a little more.....
p. 107 -- I think you need to show something in your montage proving that JoJo really was the better rider.
Great job, Bob. I see a SOM in your future. read -
A review of The Defendant (#2)by mlambush on 04/24/2011There's a kernel of a good idea here. While certainly a page turner and a lean read, I felt little emotional resonance with the characters, especially Michael. You're pretty close to having a solid plot here, but you need to give us characters we care about in order to really make this piece shine. You've got alot of setup packed into Act I and I'm not sure it's effective... There's a kernel of a good idea here. While certainly a page turner and a lean read, I felt little emotional resonance with the characters, especially Michael. You're pretty close to having a solid plot here, but you need to give us characters we care about in order to really make this piece shine.
You've got alot of setup packed into Act I and I'm not sure it's effective as it could be. For instance, the opening execution scene is not really the best way to show Michael's character or his conflict with Tallent, as Michael doesn't really do anything to get Rayfield's execution stayed. It's only because the guy has really small veins. In my opinion, you'd be better off having Michael and Tallent facing off in court, and Michael getting Rayfield off because of some technicality -- that plays in better with the ideas you are promulgating in this script.
The conversation with Michael and Robert about the pregnancy didn't seem real at all to me. Michael should be hitting the ceiling at this point. He's acting like Robert came home with a C- on a math test. Have them have a real blowup -- that way Michael can carry this tinge of regret with him knowing that the last time he saw his son it was not on the best of terms.
I was also confused about Michael's behavior in the second half of the script. He coldbloodedly executes the Blythes (in the best scene in the story, IMHO), turns himself in, confesses his guilt, says he's going to take whatever punishment comes to him -- and then proceeds to mount a defense that ends with him getting acquitted? It's a complete 180 and comes out of nowhere. Also, if he pleads guilty, then there would be no trial (we never see him plea either way in the script, it's left open)
I'd do one of two things -- 1) have him kill the Blythes and try to get away with it, rather than turn himself in; or 2) Lisa, assigned as his attorney, convinces him to mount a defense and enter a plea of Not Guilty.
Given how there was no twist in the trial, it would probably be more realistic for the jury to be deadlocked rather than reach a "not guilty" verdict.
Ben Blythe needs to be introduced in the script much sooner. Wouldn't he be at the trial every day?
Lisa is also given short shrift in the script. You have a lot of space in here to flesh out these characters a lot more and she is one that could really use some work. I get that there is some kind of romantic attraction between the two of them, but it needs to be developed over the course of the story. I was surprised when she showed up at Michael's house and asked if she could move in.
So to sum up, I think the story itself is very good, although I don't know if there's enough here for a feature length movie. It seems more like a Law and Order episode. Which is not a bad thing. If you want to bump this up to feature status, we need to feel more connection with the characters. The technical stuff with the law is all there, now we just need the heart. Good luck with this! read
Write a Comment
Submissions by mlambush
-
a screenplay by mlambushGenres: comedy
A couple's marriage and goals are put to the test by an unexpected bundle of joy.
-
a screenplay by mlambush
A British commando must save an atomic physicist to stop a rogue Nazi general from creating a superweapon.
-
a screenplay by mlambush
To save his TV show, a psychic goes on a murder spree to create victims for him to find for the police.
Reviews by mlambush 228
-
A review of Cruel To Be Kindby mlambush on 05/13/2011Well not this exact script, but dozens of others like it. The semi-autobiographical slice of life set in [high school/college], starring the author's friends or facsimiles of them, [drinking/getting high] in almost every scene, with little to no plot. If I had a dollar for every one of these I've read on Triggerstreet, I wouldn't have to worry about selling my own stuff... Well not this exact script, but dozens of others like it. The semi-autobiographical slice of life set in [high school/college], starring the author's friends or facsimiles of them, [drinking/getting high] in almost every scene, with little to no plot. If I had a dollar for every one of these I've read on Triggerstreet, I wouldn't have to worry about selling my own stuff.
I guess this is what first timers do: write what they know. Unfortunately, what we know usually isn't all that interesting. And I must confess, my first script was very much along these same lines. Of course, I realized how boring my college life was so I added in a magical amulet, machine guns, zombies and ninjas to spice it up. Still, it was very much a "first screenplay" as this one is as well.
I will say this, to your credit, you didn't have any scenes where the characters sit around quoting Tarantino films. That puts this one head and shoulders above the rest. Unfortunately, like those other scripts, you did include the cast of Superbad: Seth (Michael Cera), Kenny (Jonah Hill), and Warren Peace (McLovin).
All this is not to say that you aren't a good writer. There were several bits of greatness in this, I just think that you can do much, much better. Personally, I'd like you to take Ellie out of this script, and put her into her own script, albeit one with a goal, antagonist standing in the way of that goal, climax and resolution. I think you are more than capable of doing this.
Okay, that being said, I have a couple of constructive criticisms for the script as it exists:
1) Why does this take place in 1995? If this story has nothing to say about that time period, there's no reason to make this a period piece and drive up the cost of making it. I was in college the same time as there characters, and there was so much territory unmined here. Where was the malt liquor? After "Boyz N the Hood" every middle class white boy was drinking St. Ides and O.E. Why was someone using a cell phone? No one had cell phones back then, at the most they'd have a pager. Maker's Mark? That's everyone's favorite drink NOW. Why not Jagermeister? Or Zima? Soapnet wasn't around in the mid-90s.
2) What's the logline to this story? The logline pretty much tells me what's going to happen at the end of Act I, and this story didnt have a strong 3 act structure. Knowing what your logline is ahead of time can help you attack the story in a more efficient way. My guess is something like "A college student falls in love with the new girl on campus, creating a love triangle with her and his best friend." That's not the best, but that's basically what's happneing here and where your Act I needs to be. We need to feel the jealousy from Ellie by page 25, and Act II needs to be the rising sexual tension between Seth and Ellie, causing conflict with Allison.
3) Reduce the number of characters in this. Other than Ellie, none of them came across as particularly strong. Seth stands out only because he's your protagonist, but even he could use some work. But by the end, I couldn't tell who was who. Paul, Ian, Chet, Joe? Debbie, Brenda, Kelly? None of them had enough personality to be really distinguishable and several of them just came out of nowhere.
4) I couldn't understand why Seth liked Allison so much, other than she was hot. The ball pit scene at McD's was great, but she was just so bitchy that I couldn't feel the attraction. I liked the whole allusion to the medications earlier on, but why not show that she is really dependent on this things? Like she's on prozac all the time to control her moods (which would also be a good commentary on the 90s), and of course, alcohol mixes poorly with antidepressants. Go deeper into these characters!
5) Why is everyone laughing at their own jokes? So many dialog exchanges end with "They both laugh." Watch a comedy film -- most lines our delivered straight, that's what makes them funny. Characters laughing at their own jokes kills the humor.
6) Coincidentally, I also went to law school after college. Just reading about Civ Pro outlines made me shudder. But this brings up another point -- I was so damn busy that first year I barely had time for friends. But Seth doesn't seem to miss a beat with what's going on with Kenny and the boys. What should happen here is that Seth starts to outgrow his old buddies, thereby causing a rift (and story loving conflict) between he and Kenny.
7) Allison is getting engaged at 20? Not likely.
8) Formatting: Just call her ALLISON from the get-go, no one in the audience is going to have a copy of the script, so no need for surprise. Don't introduce characters in dialog -- use the ALL CAPS only in the action lines, the first time the character appears on screen. Watch your INT.'s and EXT.'s -- they weren't always used correctly.
Well that's about it. Overall, I think you should just chalk this one up to the learning curve and start on your next spec. But if you want to take another stab at this one, it needs a stronger 3-act story with deeper characters and more conflict. Good luck! read -
A review of Sweetheart of the Rodeoby mlambush on 05/04/2011Been a long time since I've read one of your stories, Bob. I have to say with all honesty that this one was probably my favorite. It read quickly, the actions lines were the right length with right amount of attitude, the dialog was really good and there were characters I actually cared about. I am not kidding when I say that I had an emotional moment when Brooks prevailed... Been a long time since I've read one of your stories, Bob. I have to say with all honesty that this one was probably my favorite. It read quickly, the actions lines were the right length with right amount of attitude, the dialog was really good and there were characters I actually cared about. I am not kidding when I say that I had an emotional moment when Brooks prevailed in court -- you did an excellent job setting all that up. And if it reads that well on the page, it will be even better on film.
I don't really have much to offer, so here are what few page notes I had while I read.
p. 6 - EXT. TRUCK? Should probably be EXT. INTERSECTION. The Truck is in the intersection
p. 16 -- Not Padwan warrior. "Padawan learner". The kids know their Star Wars, dude.
p. 25 -- "hearinag" -- hearing
p. 28 -- Scene starting at the bottom of the page, just doesn't feel needed. My one real structure note is that Act I is just a bit too long, and we don't really hit Act II until p. 33 or so. You can probably condense some more in the setup portion of the script.
p. 31 -- When Lacey says "But it's possible?" I think the Doctor should just respond with a look -- he was just testing Brooks' sight on the previous page and now he already has a diagnosis? I think just a look of regret will tell us what we need to know
p. 33 -- I was just thinking it might be nice to make JoJo a quirkier character. You have so many good ones in this script but she could be better
p. 59 -- Period right after the "?"
p. 79 -- JOJO says "JoJo can ride as good as ever..." you mean Brooks, right?
p. 84 -- RE: Earl's speech, I never got that Brooks was all that different. She was the same wisecracking girl she was before she went blind. Earl is the only other character beside JoJo that I think could use some touching up. He seems less well defined than Lacey, Brooks or some of the others.
p. 87 -- BROOKS: "That act gives..." should probably be "That act says...."
p. 90 -- AMY: "My mom, said...." no comma after mom
p. 94 -- The Judge is a great character
p. 96 -- The song is just "I Fought The Law"
p. 96 -- "Father, daughter" should be "father-daughter privilege"
p. 98 -- EXT. ARENA - NIGHT -- I thought the judge set the tryout for 2PM (p. 95)
p. 105 -- Does Amy give up anything but not winning? A scholarship? Money? I'm not sure what's at stake for her other than her mom wants her to win. Maybe we should see her room full of trophies at some point. Or maybe her mom was a sweetheart herself who didnt win. Just a little more.....
p. 107 -- I think you need to show something in your montage proving that JoJo really was the better rider.
Great job, Bob. I see a SOM in your future. read -
A review of The Defendant (#2)by mlambush on 04/24/2011There's a kernel of a good idea here. While certainly a page turner and a lean read, I felt little emotional resonance with the characters, especially Michael. You're pretty close to having a solid plot here, but you need to give us characters we care about in order to really make this piece shine. You've got alot of setup packed into Act I and I'm not sure it's effective... There's a kernel of a good idea here. While certainly a page turner and a lean read, I felt little emotional resonance with the characters, especially Michael. You're pretty close to having a solid plot here, but you need to give us characters we care about in order to really make this piece shine.
You've got alot of setup packed into Act I and I'm not sure it's effective as it could be. For instance, the opening execution scene is not really the best way to show Michael's character or his conflict with Tallent, as Michael doesn't really do anything to get Rayfield's execution stayed. It's only because the guy has really small veins. In my opinion, you'd be better off having Michael and Tallent facing off in court, and Michael getting Rayfield off because of some technicality -- that plays in better with the ideas you are promulgating in this script.
The conversation with Michael and Robert about the pregnancy didn't seem real at all to me. Michael should be hitting the ceiling at this point. He's acting like Robert came home with a C- on a math test. Have them have a real blowup -- that way Michael can carry this tinge of regret with him knowing that the last time he saw his son it was not on the best of terms.
I was also confused about Michael's behavior in the second half of the script. He coldbloodedly executes the Blythes (in the best scene in the story, IMHO), turns himself in, confesses his guilt, says he's going to take whatever punishment comes to him -- and then proceeds to mount a defense that ends with him getting acquitted? It's a complete 180 and comes out of nowhere. Also, if he pleads guilty, then there would be no trial (we never see him plea either way in the script, it's left open)
I'd do one of two things -- 1) have him kill the Blythes and try to get away with it, rather than turn himself in; or 2) Lisa, assigned as his attorney, convinces him to mount a defense and enter a plea of Not Guilty.
Given how there was no twist in the trial, it would probably be more realistic for the jury to be deadlocked rather than reach a "not guilty" verdict.
Ben Blythe needs to be introduced in the script much sooner. Wouldn't he be at the trial every day?
Lisa is also given short shrift in the script. You have a lot of space in here to flesh out these characters a lot more and she is one that could really use some work. I get that there is some kind of romantic attraction between the two of them, but it needs to be developed over the course of the story. I was surprised when she showed up at Michael's house and asked if she could move in.
So to sum up, I think the story itself is very good, although I don't know if there's enough here for a feature length movie. It seems more like a Law and Order episode. Which is not a bad thing. If you want to bump this up to feature status, we need to feel more connection with the characters. The technical stuff with the law is all there, now we just need the heart. Good luck with this! read -
A review of GANG CAPITALby mlambush on 09/21/2010Yes, your title was mispelled. Unless you meant "capital" as in currency. But given the way it was used on the last page, I think you meant Capitol. Anyway, I think the mechanics of the story all work. Things moved along at a nice pace, there was a lot of great action scenes and you did a good job with both tension and raising the stakes. The story itself, as in what... Yes, your title was mispelled. Unless you meant "capital" as in currency. But given the way it was used on the last page, I think you meant Capitol.
Anyway, I think the mechanics of the story all work. Things moved along at a nice pace, there was a lot of great action scenes and you did a good job with both tension and raising the stakes. The story itself, as in what happens next, I don't have any problems with, so nice job there.
Here's a few areas I think you might address in your next draft:
1) Daniel's character. Personally, I think he needs more to him than just a community activist background to drive his character. To make this work better, I think he either needs to be ex-military or an ex-gang member himself (most likely of the Prophets). I didn't buy the training sequences turning him into a bad ass, it would make much more sense if he already were a bad ass who swore himself to peace.
Honestly, the whole thing about him joining a gang didn't really jibe with me. If he is so anti-gang, why join the Prophets at all? He really didn't need their help, as he mostly acted as a one-man, Charles Bronson force of whoop ass. I was expecting a "Yojimbo" type story where Daniel plays both the gangs off one another, leading to their mutual destruction. His wholesale embrace of the Prophets just didn't ring true for me. Were they the least offensive gang in town?
To make him joining a gang really work, I think you need one of two things: a) Daniel was an ex-Prophet from back in the day, and it just makes sense for him to return to his old pals to help out, or b) The Prophets rescue Daniel in the beginning after the Disciples trash his office.
But ideally, I think the idea of Daniel as a lone vigilante, wearing the merc mask, taking on all the gangs would be the most satisfying choice.
There was one story question I had on the last page -- it said the community was starting to rally. Why? Were they inspired by what Daniel did? And if so, why? He was pretty much acting as another gangbanger in a gang war. It'd make a lot more sense if Daniel, as the lone vigilante type, rallied the community together.
2) Dialog. In spots it was really good and in a few others it got a little too expositional -- characters were just telling the audience what they needed to know rather than communicating in ways people really talk. The first instance of this that really bugged me was on p. 5 with the whole explanation of Amanda by Verafield. First, why is he telling some gang member he just met? Two, it's giving us too much too soon. The best response for Hector's question would just be "She's the reason he does what he does." Make the audience wonder... make us work for it! You can give us the rest of the explanation in the hospital scene.
There are other examples throughout, but basically I think the key is "less is more." Particularly with gang-types. Tough guys just don't talk that much, especially about their feelings.
Another big chunk is 22-23. Too much dialog and way too much info. We don't need to know half of that stuff.
I will say, the slang used throughout, is really really great and a pleasure to read. Great job there.
3) Formatting. Overall this was formatted okay, but there were a few errors that I don't think are open to artistic interpretation. The most glaring was your incorrect use of MONTAGE. When you have a series of scenes, usually with music underlying them, it's a MONTAGE. You frequently put this down as "SEQUENCE" or "VARIOUS LOCATIONS" or something strange like that. I'd consult "THE SCREENWRITER'S BIBLE" for the proper usage of MONTAGE
You should underline emphasized words rather than italicize them. It's a lot easier to read with a serif font like Courier.
You don't need all the (CONT'D)s -- they've fallen out of style.
There's a few mispelled words throughout -- "ally" instead of "alley", "Penitentury" instead of "Penitentiary".
Bottom line, I enjoyed this story quite a bit, just think it needs a little bit more polish. Best of luck with it. read -
A review of Hypnophobia (old draft)by mlambush on 07/05/2010Nice work! I really enjoyed this. Kind of a mix of "The Sixth Sense" and "What Lies Beneath" with a little bit of "The Grudge" thrown in for good measure. Unfortunately, I don't really have a lot to say because I enjoyed the read. This was very well written and executed, I liked Marisa a lot and I bought into this world you created. Hope these few minor points are of... Nice work! I really enjoyed this. Kind of a mix of "The Sixth Sense" and "What Lies Beneath" with a little bit of "The Grudge" thrown in for good measure. Unfortunately, I don't really have a lot to say because I enjoyed the read. This was very well written and executed, I liked Marisa a lot and I bought into this world you created. Hope these few minor points are of some use to you:
1) I'd lose the Obama mask. Just get all the political subtext out of the script and go for something more universal and timeless. Besides, Presidential masks have been done to death.
2) And since the killer was wearing a mask, why did he chase after Marisa and Ian? Not like they could identify him or anything...
3) The stuff that happened from 8-9 was so obviously a dream that I think you should make it shorter.
4) p. 16 -- So Zack NEVER met Marisa before, even though their parents are married? Not even a visit? Just seems a little far-fetched and unnecessary.
5) p. 18. I don't think Law is something you can major in. People that go to law school usually major in History or Political Science as undergrads.
6) bottom of 32 to top of 33, I'd cut everything between "Usually I'd kill for a good night's sleep" and then pick up with Zack saying "That sucks about your dad." We've already seen the stuff Marisa is talking about.
7) p. 38, it might be funnier if the first line in the scene is Josh saying "Does that mean we can officially call this a date now?"
8) p. 58. Why does Marisa automatically believe Cherlyn when she says it was her dad's idea to divorce? Seems like she'd deny it. But ultimately, I'd say lose this plot point. It reduces the conflict between these two characters that was really great up until now.
9) You need more of Josh and Stephen in the middle of the story. I was waiting for the scene where Stephen tells Josh "I don't want you seeing that girl any more." but it didn't come. I also would suggest planting some more red herrings throughout. I figured the killer was either Josh or Stephen, only because they are the only two characters of note in the town. Hinting that it might be Josh I think would provide some great tension when they go back to the house.
10) p. 74 gang of report[er]s.
11) p. 76. If I were Marisa, the first question out of my mouth would have been "So who killed Jessica?" It seems the natural thing to ask after Harry's story.
12) p. 77 -- CEMET[E]RY -- everyone gets that wrong, no big deal
13) p. 82. The patio window bit. Did you foreshadow to this earlier in the script? I don't remember. Might be something to do when Marisa first arrives. There's a crack in the window and Zack gives it a knowing look. I was also expecting the patio window to be the way Stephen gets it in the end, but that didn't happen. So maybe this isn't worth keeping.
That's it for page notes, and as you can see, most of them are very minor things which come down to preference. The only thing that I really had a problem with was some of the dialog. It was clunky and unnatural in a lot of places and sounded more like exposition than human speech. Two examples that really jarred me were:
p. 46 "And why would my murdered first wife appear to you?"
p. 84. "And you believed me? Why would I want you? You're just a distraction until my husband gets back. That's all you ever were."
Usually finding ways to reduce dialog to as few words as possible clears that sort of thing up.
Anyway, great job, I really enjoyed it. Best of luck with this! Oh and Lady Esmeralda rocked. read -
A review of Blockhouse Blues and the Elmore Beastby mlambush on 05/07/2010I've been looking forward to reading something by the famous Agent Cooper and I have to say, you don't disappoint. This was by any standard a superior script, a rollicking read that moved along at a fast pace and kept the reader interested from beginning to end. The dialog was inspired, and the action lines were sparse with the right amount of attitude to set the scene... I've been looking forward to reading something by the famous Agent Cooper and I have to say, you don't disappoint. This was by any standard a superior script, a rollicking read that moved along at a fast pace and kept the reader interested from beginning to end. The dialog was inspired, and the action lines were sparse with the right amount of attitude to set the scene.
I don't really have many comments because you obviously know what you are doing. But here's a few small suggestions.
1) Your major plot point, which feels like the Act II break, comes on p. 34. Which is more than a third into the story. You might want to find a way to move this back about 10 pages because, although I was very entertained by what I was reading, I was starting to wonder where things were going. There is a huge amount of flashbacks in Act I, and you might want to move this plot point in the middle of them to break some of that stuff up.
2) I'm a big fan of the Guy Ritchie films that this was obviously inspired by, but like those films we don't really get to know the characters beyond the surface. Now the only one you really need to worry about is Brains, since he is your protagonist. But I would like to know more about the guy and what motivates him other than wanting to work for Twice.
3) And speaking of Brains, here's my number one critique: the events of the third act transpire without him really doing anything. He's just tied to a chair when things sort of resolve themselves. If this guy is called "Brains" I'd really like to see him use some of that grey matter to get himself out of the situation. Maybe he's the one that tells Twice that Floyd was the mastermind and that he had come to save Kat -- and then Kat, for her own personal reasons which are revealed later, decides to go along with it. It could create some extra suspense as Twice is obviously going to ask his daughter if it was true or not. And still leave you with your great twist at the very end.
4) Floyd, Tiny and Hammers all have the same "dumb" dialog. Now don't get me wrong, it is hysterical, but it seems like you might want to give the other characters more distinct personalities. Like how about Tiny is a genius instead?
5) It wasn't clear to me that Hammers was killed. And how come his dead body wasn't questioned by Twice during the interrogation scene? Brains should somehow use that to his advantage to get out of that mess.
Well that's all I got. This was a pleasure to read. Best of luck with it. read -
A review of Black Swanby mlambush on 04/28/2010The very first line of the script is a red flag: EXT. CAR WRECK? A Car wreck isn't a location. It should be EXT. STREET What stuck out for me the most with this script was the dialogue. I never felt it was as good as it should be. Much of it was completely on the nose. It felt like the characters were talking to each other and saying things for the benefit of the audience... The very first line of the script is a red flag: EXT. CAR WRECK? A Car wreck isn't a location. It should be EXT. STREET
What stuck out for me the most with this script was the dialogue. I never felt it was as good as it should be. Much of it was completely on the nose. It felt like the characters were talking to each other and saying things for the benefit of the audience rather than the character in the scene. You wind up forcing conversations, and the dialogue becomes wooden and expository.
Going further into the dialogue, the author has set this script in the US but it's clear the writer isn't American and it shows through in what the characters are saying. Many of the terms are speech patterns used in the UK, so the characters don't come off as American at all. I see no issue in placing this script in the UK - it doesn't seem to really matter where the setting is as long as it's in a country with customs different than India.
To me, Bianca felt really cold through much of the first half of the script. I wasn't sure why you chose to draw her like that as I didn't see any solid motivation behind it. Sure, she found out that her husband had a child with another woman. But he had the relationship long before she was in the picture and he was unaware of his existence. The child would have become an orphan if not for Alex. She has no reason to act the way she did. Her motherly instinct would surely have kicked in. Right now, she's just nasty. If that's what you were going for, then you can proclaim success, but if you did it for conflict - I think it's hurting the story.
What I really think you need to do here is have Alex aware of the child, and purposely not tell Bianca about him. You're going to put Alex's likability in jeopardy, but it would create a nice rift in the relationship which natural conflict can be built upon.
You did a good job with the relationship between Holly and Shanker. It was the one part of this script that really shined. Their childhood innocence, especially Holly's, not only lightened up the dark subject matter, but it felt very organic. It was a nice contrast to the events leading up to and the situations that shaped the world the characters were in.
Finally, there isn't much of a story that would fit the film medium. There is no clear protagonist. At times it feels like Alex and other times it feels like Shanker. Since there is no clear protagonist, there isn't a clear goal and without a goal, the plot suffers. The film is extremely low-concept and doesn't really have a market. Granted, not all writers write to sell, but all writers must write for a market - I just don't see one in this story. read -
A review of Sweet Dreams Nightmareby mlambush on 04/25/2010Everyone likes a good zombie-film, myself included. Nothing beats a screen full of the undead looking for a little lunch and a guy with an axe splitting heads of said undead. But you know what they say, man cannot live on zombies alone... or something like that. You're opening image was intriguing. We are introduced to Jack and the great thing about him is that he's got... Everyone likes a good zombie-film, myself included. Nothing beats a screen full of the undead looking for a little lunch and a guy with an axe splitting heads of said undead. But you know what they say, man cannot live on zombies alone... or something like that.
You're opening image was intriguing. We are introduced to Jack and the great thing about him is that he's got this little kid's coffin strapped to his back and something kicking from inside of it. This coupled with the fact that the character lives in a truly mad environment, being that it's full of the undead gives us intrigue and conflict. All very good.
After that, ACT I seemed to deflate rather quickly. Instead of keeping the audience wondering what's going on inside that coffin, we can deduce almost immediately that it's his daughter. That's a really strong plot device you had there and I think you could get milk it a little more. And I love a good supporting VO as much as the next guy, but if you spoon feed the reader every little detail for the entire act - there is probably some room for a little more plot development through action.
This act also lacks the proper set up for Jack as the protagonist. There's plenty of conflict - there's undead everywhere - but what is Jack's role in the film? He doesn't seem to need to do anything besides not get infected, but what he really needs to do is try not to get infected while pursuing a goal.
By the middle of the script, the voiceover became a little much. There is virtually no dialogue between any characters aside from Jack's V.O. to the audience up to this point. Try to image what it would be like to watch a film with no dialogue at all - just a guy fighting zombies and telling us what it's like to fight zombies. There's not much drama there. We need to see people interacting with one another - that's a big part of movies.
It was good to see you finally get away from the voice over in the third act but your dialogue did essentially the same thing during the scenes in the sanctuary. It was all just exposition - characters spoonfeeding plot to the audience through dialogue.
Format. You use a lot of CUT TO:'s, which is fine if that's your thing, but it looks like your using them to add length as well as fudging the margins. At 94 pages now, I'd be surprised if this script was any longer than 85. Try building out on some of the points above and I think you'll have this at feature length and a much more developed script.
In short, the biggest aspect this screenplay lacked was a solid plot. It is essentially a man killing zombie-like beings and talking to the audience with voiceover. Other than to stay alive, there is no goal or journey for him to go on and nothing for him to achieve. In the end he achieves nothing more than becoming a monster himself. Work a goal into the story, add some more characters we care about and have them interact with each other and you'll be on your way to a well rounded story. read -
A review of Wake Up, Maggie (SCSS)by mlambush on 10/27/2009I thought this was a pretty serviceable Rom Com -- no major surprises, but with this type of film, is all about the journey and you have a couple of nice stops along the way. For the most part it was a quick read. A lot of my suggestions have to do with your setup in Act One. Gerry is too much of a nice, down to earth guy from the very beginning, without any real flaws... I thought this was a pretty serviceable Rom Com -- no major surprises, but with this type of film, is all about the journey and you have a couple of nice stops along the way. For the most part it was a quick read.
A lot of my suggestions have to do with your setup in Act One. Gerry is too much of a nice, down to earth guy from the very beginning, without any real flaws except for his discomfort around dogs. Maggie, on the other hand, already writes him off as being a typical spoiled Hollywood star, so the initial conflict is actually based on her misunderstanding rather than any flaw on Gerry's part. And since we know Gerry is a stand-up bloke from the beginning, this just makes her seem like an unappealing person, and so I never really warmed to her.
I think it would help if Gerry actually WAS a spoiled Hollywood star. Sure, he can have the regular guy background, but somewhere along the way he lost touch with who he really was and this story, for him, will be about getting back to that, so his character can have some actual growth. It would also be a better source of conflict than what's happening now.
I think having two accidents is a bit much. I'd lose Maggie's accident and just keep Gerry's, but make it a little more serious. Like he breaks his arm or something. The setup with the Dog movie is a little weak and just seems like some exposition to get him to Maggie's compound. How about he hurt himself and he actually needs one of those dogs to help him out while he recuperates? But he HATES dogs -- not just uncomfortable. Maybe he's a cat person. There's a lot of sources for conflict in this first half of the script that haven't been fully vetted.
My other big suggestion is that you show the TV interview. It is such a pivotal part of the story -- it represents when Gerry's eyes finally open to how awesome Maggie is -- and yet we never see it. You've got to show it. Too many people reference the interview in the story for you to just cutaway before it happens.
There's also room for another big "setpiece" in the script. I'm thinking you should show Gerry learn to ride the dogs around with the bike for a bit longer, and make a real comedy sequence out of it.
Finally, I never felt like Pete was much of a threat to their relationship and that source of conflict could be amped up.
Nice work, overall. Good luck with this! read -
A review of No Man Left Behindby mlambush on 09/18/2009This one didn't really work for me. It was a fast read, but that was mostly because nothing much was happening throughout most of Act II, so there wasn't a lot to pay attention to. There were some funny bits to be sure, but the tone of this script veered so much between comedy and drama that I wasn't sure what I was supposed to be laughing at and what I was supposed to... This one didn't really work for me. It was a fast read, but that was mostly because nothing much was happening throughout most of Act II, so there wasn't a lot to pay attention to. There were some funny bits to be sure, but the tone of this script veered so much between comedy and drama that I wasn't sure what I was supposed to be laughing at and what I was supposed to be troubled by. Overall, the behavior of all of these characters was disturbing and this script might benefit from being re-done as strictly a drama. As a comedy, I think you'd need to go with a lighter touch, a la "Superbad".
May major issue is that there's just not much at stake for Jon. By the end of Act I he decides he wants to be the biggest marijuana dealer, and that happens in relatively short order. And all goes swell for Jon until the party at Edden's house, so that means for about 50 pages we are just spinning our wheels, going from party to party while a plethora of characters pass through at a head-spinning pace. The all-is-lost moment around p. 77 is quickly turned around without much more than a pep talk, and the Detective is dispatched in short order. If Faso was talking so much, I'm sure he would've mentioned that Jon was dealing as well.
One thing might help is to give your characters some more distinct names. You have a Jon, James, Jerome, Jeremy (who is Jon's brother's friend, even though we have no way of knowing this) and even Faso's first name is Joey. We also have an Ally and an Ashley, a Mesa and a Mapler, Becky, Ben.... it gets pretty confusing keeping track of everyone. I'd suggest giving all of your characters names that start with different letters for one, and then reducing the number of characters you have. Like maybe Jon only has one best friend, Mapler, and some of these other characters come along after he becomes popular. By the time Jon was driving around with Ben, I was thinking, "who the hell is Ben??" It seems like Jon only leaves Ashley behind, it might help the story if he leaves a couple of his friends behind and makes all new ones. It would also give your title and the tap a double meaning and a little more symbolism for your theme.
Format and spelling need a lot of work. For format, I'd pick up Dave Trottier's "The Screenwriter's Bible, 4th Ed." and study the hell out of that sucker. Spelling is another issue - get someone to proof this bad boy for you. And man, it's "douchebag". That's one of the greatest words in the English language, if you're going to spell at least one thing right, let it be that.
Much of this seems like you settling some personal grievances from your past. I wrote a script like that as well when I was in my early 20s, but it wasn't all that good and I moved onto other things. There are some good jokes in here and I think they could be recycled into a better, more focused story. Keep writing! read
Comments About mlambush 275
-
heat_wave187 on 02/03/2012
thanks, mickey i am in distinguished company... -
Michelle77 on 01/07/2012
mlambush wrote:Dumbass
That's no way to talk to your future mother-in-law, mlambush. -
DebraSwan on 01/07/2012
Congratulations on the Spotlight nod! Well done. -
Michelle77 on 10/19/2011
Dumbass. -
Michelle77 on 10/18/2011
Dumbass. -
capper on 07/19/2011
110 characters just isn't enough, unless our we change our loglines into caveman speak, there's just no way. -
capper on 06/08/2011
Thanks for the quick reply.
That makes perfect sense!
Cheers -
capper on 06/08/2011
Thanks for the review of Crankshafted. i'm very glad you enjoyed it!
In regards to Zak's goal, to me, it was the fake goal of getting Crankshaft to Utah with the aim of arresting him for Derek's murder. Should I add a more personal one as you mentioned?
I agree with the gun and will make it blood covered. Thanks for pointing it out!
Again, thanks and good luck with your work.
Daniel -
solardae on 06/03/2011
concerning Frontier; Italics, gotcha. always wondered about those and underlining....about the opening, well, you're right, and trust me, i struggled with creating an opening that lead to the spacers, or starting with the spacers but not losing the jist of the story, and what you read was the only sensible thing i could come up with. For an opening i think it works...removing the marines, danny, the idea that they're on a search and rescue mission (not to mention what they represent) takes a bit away from encountering the vaundi...and at this point, we've all seen Avatar.
with the characters, i wanted to relay the reality of a convoluted command structure that runs the administration...not one villain, but many. although, script/film wise, this is generally not a good idea. I figure this story would be better in a three hour span versus two, but as spec scripts go...
concerning a flashback..i thought of that, for describing the vaundi encounter, but it felt like a cop-out, not having the full impact of just being there when it happens, if you know what i mean.
if any more ideas for reconstituting this work, lemme know!!
-
phil.laaveg on 06/01/2011
Thanks for your review of Time Storm!
I'm totally with you on Johnny. I was trying to set him up as a mirror to Nick - the successful, put-together kid with the perfect family, etc. I was struggling to fit him into most scenes since Emily was such a stronger character.
I didn't even look into Howard University! Should definitely do a little Googling on things like that.
I get what you're saying about the stakes starting as high as they can go from the very start. I think if I successfully set up better emotional stakes between Nick and Gordon and Nick and Emily that will be the actual focus in Act 3.
Thanks again for your review! Some spot on observations.
Phil
Write a Comment
Browse:
Copyright © 2001-2013 Trigger Street Labs. All Rights Reserved.
Comments About mlambush 275
-
Quote
thanks, mickey i am in distinguished company...
-
Quote
mlambush wrote:
Dumbass
-
Quote
Congratulations on the Spotlight nod! Well done.
+ more commentsheat_wave187 on 02/03/2012
Michelle77 on 01/07/2012
That's no way to talk to your future mother-in-law, mlambush.
DebraSwan on 01/07/2012