mlwillis
You have to be who you are, simply because that is who you are. People inadvertently, with their attitudes, try to alter you, but you must resist, listen, acknowledge, and keep true, without fear and intimidation. You can walk into a room...
Bio
You have to be who you are, simply because that is who you are. People inadvertently, with their attitudes, try to alter you, but you must resist, listen, acknowledge, and keep true, without fear and intimidation. You can walk into a room and half of the people won't like you no matter what you do, so be yourself, and the right half won't like you. ML Willis I don't know the key to success, but the key to failure is trying to please everybody. Bill Cosby
Submissions by mlwillis
No submissions (yet)
Reviews by mlwillis 39
-
A review of Prodigal Child 2nd Revision May 2008by mlwillis on 10/22/2008Some potential here. I like a lot of things in here. My primary concern is the lack of structure to your story line. I really didn’t like this script until page 32. There were some good intriguing things when Bryan talks about himself as the dust in the wind. Then it goes back to the predictable. It has potential but you need to flush out the theme a little better. Faith,... Some potential here. I like a lot of things in here. My primary concern is the lack of structure to your story line. I really didn’t like this script until page 32. There were some good intriguing things when Bryan talks about himself as the dust in the wind.
Then it goes back to the predictable. It has potential but you need to flush out the theme a little better. Faith, God, forgiveness. Ratchet up the script with a strong plot.
You could cut out a lot of stuff in this script. Show us, don’t tell us everything. You have potential here. It needs to be flushed out though.
l. FORMATTING
Your dialogue is too thick and wide. You need to set it within the parameters of script formatting. You can get celtx a free script software to use to help. You have a lot of capitalizations when you introduce characters, capitalize only the name, not the description. Your slug lines are wrong. EXT. SHOP (REAR) – DAY. Instead of, rear of shop.
ll. PLOT/STRUCTURE:
Do Asian police use yellow tape like here in the USA? I’d do a bit more research to be sure, it is possible that they use a lot of our techniques, but it just doesn’t give it an authentic feel. This story really drags on. I waited for turning points and they never really came. There is very little tension. The story is predictable. You have no structure. No turning points in the right places, this reads more like a book, or a soap opera.
The ending was so, so, not very much fun getting there. It’s like you’re writing for an audience of one. Yourself. Give me something to like. Everything is predictable and happens way too easy. In particular, when Kim asks Bryan to marry her. You need more obstacles. You need a deeper, and clearer plot.
III. CHARACTERS:
I could envision the characters because I‘ve seen them before in other movies. They don’t grow very much and the whole setup was very slow. They only time they grow is when they said they have grown. Instead of showing it. The characters were common, predicable, and very stereotypical. We know who the hero is, we know the bad guys, but I didn’t feel any of the tension, the jeopardy that was needed. What was at stake for her? She (Kim) seemed detached, one dimensional.
I could not relate to Kim or really any of the characters.
IV. DIALOGUE
The dialogue for the most part is not believable, and has a lot of exposition. Bryan has the best dialogue. Kim fell really flat and predictable. Perhaps due to her stereotypical one dimensional charater.
V. SCENE DESCRIPTION
You have some good descriptions in some parts, I think it’s due to lack of story that your description is rather lackluster.
I know that you have potential. I would suggestion coming with a stronger plot. Make it clearer. Cut out a lot of what doesn’t need to be there. Ask yourself why is this scene here? Does it add anything? If the answer is no take it out find a scene that is far more interesting to watch.
I wish you the best. Keep writing. read -
A review of The Good of the Many (rev1)by mlwillis on 09/22/2008Wow. There really isn’t too much I can say here. You’ve done a really good job. But I’ll try to help a little. I. FORMATTING Your formatting is good. There are a few spelling errors and typos but you’ll have no problem fixing them. II. PLOT/STRUCTURE: You have a good plot, an okay name. Your structure is good too. You could probably cut some things out, but that’s a matter... Wow. There really isn’t too much I can say here. You’ve done a really good job. But I’ll try to help a little.
I. FORMATTING
Your formatting is good. There are a few spelling errors and typos but you’ll have no problem fixing them.
II. PLOT/STRUCTURE:
You have a good plot, an okay name. Your structure is good too. You could probably cut some things out, but that’s a matter of taste. You really should get rid of your flashbacks. Find another way to show us internal and external (past) reveals. Even if it’s a little more exposition. Flashbacks don’t work very well in the Action-Adventure genre. Plus tweak up your three main action scenes in act two. I can see this being a movie. But you’ll have to cut and rework. As is, it’s a good read. But it needs to be smokin’.
III. CHARACTERS:
I think you could get rid of a few characters. It gets really complicated. I like your characters for the most part. You have good names. I think you should work on Nat’s arc a little more. Add a little more depth. I know you’re already at 119 pages. That’s where tightening and killing off some of your babies might help. Or maybe leave the babies, just get rid of the fluff.
IV. DIALOGUE
Most of your dialogue is solid. Sometimes the characters were too close with similarities of speech patterns. considering there are several languages/culural differences I would think it would be both hard and easy to show.
V. SCENE DESCRIPTION
This was a really easy read for the most part. The descriptions were clean, and virtually crisp. I didn’t have to reread or go back to know what the hell was going on.
Great job! I wish you all the best, M.L.
read -
A review of Graveyard Gray - Revby mlwillis on 01/31/2008Overall I like your writing, but I had to hunt really hard for the story. Page three, I’d take out, what is that bill, I’m tired (you’ve already established that) it's unnecessary. Go from, Yeah, to you can’t deviate from the script. He says nothing, come to my office. Show. Show. Introduce Felicia in the above scene. Take out os, you’re directing. Next scene’s really good,... Overall I like your writing, but I had to hunt really hard for the story.
Page three, I’d take out, what is that bill, I’m tired (you’ve already established that) it's unnecessary. Go from, Yeah, to you can’t deviate from the script. He says nothing, come to my office. Show. Show.
Introduce Felicia in the above scene. Take out os, you’re directing. Next scene’s really good, except just say to the side of her name, (on phone) like you would use os. Just my point of view, Felicia wouldn’t swear like that. It seems out of character. It doesn’t fit and adds nothing to the scene.
I don’t know of any sister that calls her brother Bill. It's Billy or some kind of nickname. Even if they’re not close.
Page 8 I wouldn’t say that place freaks me out. Maybe more like, you know how I feel about that house. Something more evasive.
I don’t think you need the airplane scene at all. Maybe a brief at the airport glance, but everyone knows how it is on a plane. Its not necessary.
Page 15 if the TVs blaring in the other room. We should hear it when they first walk in.
Page 15 just say, Patti mutes the TV.
I don’t believe his father wouldn’t send him at least a birthday card. Maybe in the beginning you could show a pile of unopened mail from his father to show they are distant instead of them telling us what they both already know. It’s not natural.
Just a suggestion the vulgar language adds nothing to it. And would limit you. I’d advise you to cut out the f words and use something more comfortable to Bill. Unless he’s a real low life and I didn’t get that impression.
I just get the feeling that a lot of what’s in this story is just there for no reason. Remember everything must move the story forward and if it doesn’t cut it.
I couldn’t connect with any of the characters they seemed contrived, predictable. The story was disjointed clumsy. I do like most of your writing, but I would try to leave out some of the bathroom humor.
The formatting is not bad a little awkward in places. Pacing is way off. It takes way too long to get to anything remotely good. I’d cut out a lot and start from there. I know it’s a lot of work but you can do. You have a story somewhere in there. Best of luck. read
Write a Comment
Submissions by mlwillis
No submissions (yet)
Reviews by mlwillis 39
-
A review of Prodigal Child 2nd Revision May 2008by mlwillis on 10/22/2008Some potential here. I like a lot of things in here. My primary concern is the lack of structure to your story line. I really didn’t like this script until page 32. There were some good intriguing things when Bryan talks about himself as the dust in the wind. Then it goes back to the predictable. It has potential but you need to flush out the theme a little better. Faith,... Some potential here. I like a lot of things in here. My primary concern is the lack of structure to your story line. I really didn’t like this script until page 32. There were some good intriguing things when Bryan talks about himself as the dust in the wind.
Then it goes back to the predictable. It has potential but you need to flush out the theme a little better. Faith, God, forgiveness. Ratchet up the script with a strong plot.
You could cut out a lot of stuff in this script. Show us, don’t tell us everything. You have potential here. It needs to be flushed out though.
l. FORMATTING
Your dialogue is too thick and wide. You need to set it within the parameters of script formatting. You can get celtx a free script software to use to help. You have a lot of capitalizations when you introduce characters, capitalize only the name, not the description. Your slug lines are wrong. EXT. SHOP (REAR) – DAY. Instead of, rear of shop.
ll. PLOT/STRUCTURE:
Do Asian police use yellow tape like here in the USA? I’d do a bit more research to be sure, it is possible that they use a lot of our techniques, but it just doesn’t give it an authentic feel. This story really drags on. I waited for turning points and they never really came. There is very little tension. The story is predictable. You have no structure. No turning points in the right places, this reads more like a book, or a soap opera.
The ending was so, so, not very much fun getting there. It’s like you’re writing for an audience of one. Yourself. Give me something to like. Everything is predictable and happens way too easy. In particular, when Kim asks Bryan to marry her. You need more obstacles. You need a deeper, and clearer plot.
III. CHARACTERS:
I could envision the characters because I‘ve seen them before in other movies. They don’t grow very much and the whole setup was very slow. They only time they grow is when they said they have grown. Instead of showing it. The characters were common, predicable, and very stereotypical. We know who the hero is, we know the bad guys, but I didn’t feel any of the tension, the jeopardy that was needed. What was at stake for her? She (Kim) seemed detached, one dimensional.
I could not relate to Kim or really any of the characters.
IV. DIALOGUE
The dialogue for the most part is not believable, and has a lot of exposition. Bryan has the best dialogue. Kim fell really flat and predictable. Perhaps due to her stereotypical one dimensional charater.
V. SCENE DESCRIPTION
You have some good descriptions in some parts, I think it’s due to lack of story that your description is rather lackluster.
I know that you have potential. I would suggestion coming with a stronger plot. Make it clearer. Cut out a lot of what doesn’t need to be there. Ask yourself why is this scene here? Does it add anything? If the answer is no take it out find a scene that is far more interesting to watch.
I wish you the best. Keep writing. read -
A review of The Good of the Many (rev1)by mlwillis on 09/22/2008Wow. There really isn’t too much I can say here. You’ve done a really good job. But I’ll try to help a little. I. FORMATTING Your formatting is good. There are a few spelling errors and typos but you’ll have no problem fixing them. II. PLOT/STRUCTURE: You have a good plot, an okay name. Your structure is good too. You could probably cut some things out, but that’s a matter... Wow. There really isn’t too much I can say here. You’ve done a really good job. But I’ll try to help a little.
I. FORMATTING
Your formatting is good. There are a few spelling errors and typos but you’ll have no problem fixing them.
II. PLOT/STRUCTURE:
You have a good plot, an okay name. Your structure is good too. You could probably cut some things out, but that’s a matter of taste. You really should get rid of your flashbacks. Find another way to show us internal and external (past) reveals. Even if it’s a little more exposition. Flashbacks don’t work very well in the Action-Adventure genre. Plus tweak up your three main action scenes in act two. I can see this being a movie. But you’ll have to cut and rework. As is, it’s a good read. But it needs to be smokin’.
III. CHARACTERS:
I think you could get rid of a few characters. It gets really complicated. I like your characters for the most part. You have good names. I think you should work on Nat’s arc a little more. Add a little more depth. I know you’re already at 119 pages. That’s where tightening and killing off some of your babies might help. Or maybe leave the babies, just get rid of the fluff.
IV. DIALOGUE
Most of your dialogue is solid. Sometimes the characters were too close with similarities of speech patterns. considering there are several languages/culural differences I would think it would be both hard and easy to show.
V. SCENE DESCRIPTION
This was a really easy read for the most part. The descriptions were clean, and virtually crisp. I didn’t have to reread or go back to know what the hell was going on.
Great job! I wish you all the best, M.L.
read -
A review of Graveyard Gray - Revby mlwillis on 01/31/2008Overall I like your writing, but I had to hunt really hard for the story. Page three, I’d take out, what is that bill, I’m tired (you’ve already established that) it's unnecessary. Go from, Yeah, to you can’t deviate from the script. He says nothing, come to my office. Show. Show. Introduce Felicia in the above scene. Take out os, you’re directing. Next scene’s really good,... Overall I like your writing, but I had to hunt really hard for the story.
Page three, I’d take out, what is that bill, I’m tired (you’ve already established that) it's unnecessary. Go from, Yeah, to you can’t deviate from the script. He says nothing, come to my office. Show. Show.
Introduce Felicia in the above scene. Take out os, you’re directing. Next scene’s really good, except just say to the side of her name, (on phone) like you would use os. Just my point of view, Felicia wouldn’t swear like that. It seems out of character. It doesn’t fit and adds nothing to the scene.
I don’t know of any sister that calls her brother Bill. It's Billy or some kind of nickname. Even if they’re not close.
Page 8 I wouldn’t say that place freaks me out. Maybe more like, you know how I feel about that house. Something more evasive.
I don’t think you need the airplane scene at all. Maybe a brief at the airport glance, but everyone knows how it is on a plane. Its not necessary.
Page 15 if the TVs blaring in the other room. We should hear it when they first walk in.
Page 15 just say, Patti mutes the TV.
I don’t believe his father wouldn’t send him at least a birthday card. Maybe in the beginning you could show a pile of unopened mail from his father to show they are distant instead of them telling us what they both already know. It’s not natural.
Just a suggestion the vulgar language adds nothing to it. And would limit you. I’d advise you to cut out the f words and use something more comfortable to Bill. Unless he’s a real low life and I didn’t get that impression.
I just get the feeling that a lot of what’s in this story is just there for no reason. Remember everything must move the story forward and if it doesn’t cut it.
I couldn’t connect with any of the characters they seemed contrived, predictable. The story was disjointed clumsy. I do like most of your writing, but I would try to leave out some of the bathroom humor.
The formatting is not bad a little awkward in places. Pacing is way off. It takes way too long to get to anything remotely good. I’d cut out a lot and start from there. I know it’s a lot of work but you can do. You have a story somewhere in there. Best of luck. read -
A review of I Chanced Upon a Faunby mlwillis on 01/24/2008There is just something really cool about this story, yet it’s very perverse. It brings out the bestiality in me, and since I don’t have any, any way. Or do I? Maybe it’s more like Beauty and The beast. I liked your story overall. I think the ending was a bit rushed. I’m not sure how long a short story should be, since I primarily write scripts. But I’d add more. I did from... There is just something really cool about this story, yet it’s very perverse. It brings out the bestiality in me, and since I don’t have any, any way. Or do I? Maybe it’s more like Beauty and The beast. I liked your story overall. I think the ending was a bit rushed. I’m not sure how long a short story should be, since I primarily write scripts. But I’d add more. I did from the beginning know the ending. You built it up quite nicely. I think you could turn this into a really great book. Overall you did quite well. I think you should have her struggle with leaving her life a bit. But it’s your baby. Good luck. Nice job. read
-
A review of Dogs Smoking In Paradiseby mlwillis on 01/20/2008I had to use a lot of extra brain cells to wrap my head around this one. Very interesting Mr. Spock. FADEIN: OVER BLACK: “The important thing is to… You only need one fadein. You can use b.g. for background. I’m noticing a pattern here. You wrote a shooting script. Which is fine if someone hired you to write it. If not you should write in a speculation format: aka a spec... I had to use a lot of extra brain cells to wrap my head around this one. Very interesting Mr. Spock.
FADEIN:
OVER BLACK: “The important thing is to…
You only need one fadein. You can use b.g. for background. I’m noticing a pattern here. You wrote a shooting script. Which is fine if someone hired you to write it. If not you should write in a speculation format: aka a spec script. Meaning that you’re writing this script in the hopes that someone, someday, will like it so much that they’ll buy or option it. So there in lies the problem. You have to make it really reader friendly. Not complicated. It’s written very well for a shooting script, almost. It's like a cross breed: Half spec, half shooting. You have to write so the director can add his vision. In this script you control everything. If you were hired by someone then I really don’t have any advice. If not. I suggestion you get a format book. You have a lot of it down, but you can’t do all the things you are doing in this script. CU. Transitions. They can be described in different ways. Dialogue is way too thick too. A lot of this you can keep for the spec but you’ll have to change quiet a lot of it. The story over all is interesting. You are a good writer no doubt. Clean it up a bit change the format a bit and you’ll be rockin’ and rollin’ Good job. Best of luck. read -
A review of The Golem of Avenue Bby mlwillis on 11/22/2007Don’t use SPX, just say. BOMBS EXPLODE. MUSIC POUNDS. The boy CRIES. I don’t think he can cry silently. We hear him or we don’t. Don’t use Angles. You’re not the director. That’s not your job. This is a blueprint of a film. Don’t tell us how to build the wall. Show us. Don’t use starts to, begins to, or tries to. Over all this reads like a first draft. I think this... Don’t use SPX, just say. BOMBS EXPLODE. MUSIC POUNDS.
The boy CRIES. I don’t think he can cry silently. We hear him or we don’t.
Don’t use Angles. You’re not the director. That’s not your job. This is a blueprint of a film. Don’t tell us how to build the wall.
Show us.
Don’t use starts to, begins to, or tries to.
Over all this reads like a first draft. I think this would be a great film, if you spend some time on it.
Don’t say we see, or we hear. You can do this many ways. INSERT: TAG. It reads: “
I love you’re names, and you’re concept. This will be great if you keep hammering away at it. Right now, not so much.
I would use, BACK TO SCENE, instead of end of flashback.
I would also use MEMORY instead of FLASHBACK.
This story reminds me of Pan’s Labyrinth. read -
A review of LIGHTING THE MENORAH (Revised)by mlwillis on 11/21/2007I am very impressed. You can tell you have worked very hard on this. I normally don't like teenage stories, obviously because I'm older. But you've done a really good job. I didn't really find any errors. Formatting excellent. Story structure excellent. characters good. somewhat typical. It reminds me of a couple of other movies that have already been made. I really don't know... I am very impressed. You can tell you have worked very hard on this. I normally don't like teenage stories, obviously because I'm older. But you've done a really good job. I didn't really find any errors. Formatting excellent. Story structure excellent. characters good. somewhat typical. It reminds me of a couple of other movies that have already been made. I really don't know what to add to help you with this. I think you could probably raise the stakes a bit more, add a little more intensity and motivation. I'd really like you to punch up the comedy a bit more too. I guess over all it really doesn't stand out as far as concept. read
-
A review of Early Timesby mlwillis on 12/31/2006I was really excited to read this. I really, really liked it at first. There is a lot of good stuff in here. But here are some notes that I hope will help you as you rewrite. Telling the director what to do is a big no, no. P.O.V. is used in a shooting script not a spec script. Never use We see or we hear. A script reads much better without using them. Plus you have talent... I was really excited to read this. I really, really liked it at first. There is a lot of good stuff in here.
But here are some notes that I hope will help you as you rewrite. Telling the director what to do is a big no, no. P.O.V. is used in a shooting script not a spec script. Never use We see or we hear. A script reads much better without using them. Plus you have talent find a way of showing us without telling us.
When you use intercut it goes like this.
INTERCUT: SHOCK ROOM/SMITHING SHED - NIGHT
Big Ugly GIGLING. Blah.
blah
SHOCK ROOM
They move…
SMITHING SHED.
Instead of Flashback use memory.
In the case of the series of flashbacks use.
SERIES OF SHOTS:
- Clive sees his mother.
- She smiles at him.
- ,,,,
I really loved most of your characters. But…
Clive shouldn’t swear. At least not the F***. It doesn’t suit him I don’t think people. even "bad" people. talked liked that back then especially when they come from a small town with a God fearing Christian mother.
I really loved Lucy except to say a woman is ruggedly beautiful. That’s not a good visual. I kept seeing a mountain man or something. I also think you should seriously leave out the stuff about the baby. It doesn’t do one thing for your story. Even with Manny it was weird.
You definitely should cut out all of Big Ugly and the Rev. It didn’t do anything to move the story forward. It just made it more confusing. Save them for another story. Not to mention that it will help you shave off pages. You need to lose at leaset 10 pages.
I think Clive and Lucy should meet Manny sooner. He was great. You had some really beautiful dialogue. But kill, please, kill that baby stuff it was whack. Manny looking for his illegitimate son didn’t work either unless you cut Rev and BG and slowly added bits and pieces: Shorter exposition.
I hated the ended. Hated. Hated. Hated. It’s your baby (oops) but Clive should live. The hand reaching out of the boxcar when he first meets Lucy is great. Fake his death again and let them both get on the train. They may not have money but at least the have each other.
The magical dialogue is enough. Leave out the magic box. Good luck! Don’t give up. You know you’re good. read -
A review of God's Universeby mlwillis on 12/22/2006The overall concept is very creative and intelligent. The first thirty or forty pages were very laborious. The long paragraphs and mounds of dialogue made it very hard at times to stay focus on anything. The dialogue was interesting but needed to be shortened. Yet there was enough interest created along the way that I wanted to know the ending. At times it was very easy to... The overall concept is very creative and intelligent. The first thirty or forty pages were very laborious. The long paragraphs and mounds of dialogue made it very hard at times to stay focus on anything. The dialogue was interesting but needed to be shortened. Yet there was enough interest created along the way that I wanted to know the ending. At times it was very easy to get confused and lost for any number of reasons. There was too much telling and very little showing. Very few times did I get good visuals? The script really didn’t get funny until the last third. But it was very funny a couple of times. I was very disappointed by the ending.
read
Comments About mlwillis 10
-
Piper07 on 02/13/2010
I just noticed that you had me on your favorites. I also noticed that you have my favorite quote on your profile also. That's very cool. Thanks for having me on your favorites.
~Piper -
montana malone on 10/25/2008
Comment deleted by mlwillis -
scotfire on 10/25/2008
Comment deleted by mlwillis -
hughbrune on 10/12/2008
Comment deleted by mlwillis -
Lazzard on 09/27/2008
Yeah, I enjoyed reading 'Alice'and was suprised to see the slightly negative reviews,
Are you thinking of another draft?
Glad you enjoyed La Ville Fleurie -
**DELETED ACCOUNT** on 01/29/2008
Thank you very much for the review. I agree with you and the others. You could probably tell that this is my first script with very little knowledge on how to write one. I'm trying to give it my best effort to make this a possible career choice, but I still have a lot to learn. Having people like you here on TS is very helpful.
My script is scheduled to be deleted because I'm currently re-writing a lot of it. In fact, the first 30 pages are completely different. When I say 'completely', I mean not one sentence is the same. Dialogue is the hardest thing for me, but I might be getting the hang of it.
When you say 'hook', what do you exactly mean?
Anyway, thank you very much for the review. I hope I can return the favor sometime soon.
-Greg -
**DELETED ACCOUNT** on 01/25/2008
ML ~ I very much appreciate your time and effort in reading and reviewing Corona & Ginger. Thanks, too, for the many kind words. As far as how long it took to write, I can't say. I never pay attention, but I'd guess a couple of days. If it doesn't come as just a kind of explosion of energy it doesn't get finished. It has to happen fairly fast or I lose interest. Thanks again for reading it. Enjoy the day! -
**DELETED ACCOUNT** on 01/21/2008
Hey, thanks for reading and review If Kelly Kittrick Dies. Actually, it's been steadily trimmed from its original size of 126 pages. This particular script represents an experiment for me on TS. It was the first one I ever posted about three years ago. I decided, within reason, that I would take as many recommendations as possible, change it, reshape it, shorten it, based on people's ideas and helpful criticism. I haven't done that with any others. It started out with negative reviews, got lots of good help, and then moved steadily upward. Finally it got two blue stars in a row, but I thought, hey, I can make it better. Now it's getting hit for being too thin, too cut and dried, too formulaic. I love people and their ideas, but at some point I know I've got to decide what it's going to be and keep it there -- but not yet, I'm having too much fun. Thanks so much for your good review and helpful ideas. They are very much appreciated. You enjoy the day now! -
mlwillis on 12/02/2007
Thanks! I really appreciate that. I've learned to really try to help people the best that I can. Sometimes I succeed and others I do not. Thank you for your kind words. It means a lot.
-
sabin on 12/01/2007
I just read one of your reviews! It was awesome and well thought out. Do I smell a ROM in the works? Kudos!
Write a Comment
Browse:
Copyright © 2001-2013 Trigger Street Labs. All Rights Reserved.
Comments About mlwillis 10
-
Quote
I just noticed that you had me on your favorites. I also noticed that you have my favorite quote on your profile also. That's very cool. Thanks for having me on your favorites.
-
Quote
Comment deleted by mlwillis
-
Quote
Comment deleted by mlwillis
+ more commentsPiper07 on 02/13/2010
~Piper
montana malone on 10/25/2008
scotfire on 10/25/2008