nycdi
member since 02/21/2005 |
last login 02/02/2012
Writing, producing, creating, and studying in NYC. Learning much from the brilliance that surrounds me. "There's a difference between not believing in anything and believing in nothing."...
Bio
Writing, producing, creating, and studying in NYC. Learning much from the brilliance that surrounds me. "There's a difference between not believing in anything and believing in nothing."
Submissions by nycdi
No submissions (yet)
Reviews by nycdi 16
-
A review of Goodbyeby nycdi on 11/16/2009I've watched "Goodbye" and, though I see that it was uploaded in 2005, I have some feedback for you. The story is very good and feels complete. What happens too often with short films is either the script is inadequate and doesn't have enough going on, or the filmmaker tries to cram too much into a story which would've been better developed as a feature. This one was just... I've watched "Goodbye" and, though I see that it was uploaded in 2005, I have some feedback for you. The story is very good and feels complete. What happens too often with short films is either the script is inadequate and doesn't have enough going on, or the filmmaker tries to cram too much into a story which would've been better developed as a feature. This one was just right. The acting was also very good, natural, appropriate for the roles. My only contention is with certain elements of the production. The lighting was not optimal - too dark and muddy in most of it (but not all). But the audio is not good! It's so muffled that I can't understand most of what the characters are saying, especially when we see the guy sitting at a picnic bench with the new girlfriend - none of his voiceover is understandable. And I guess I didn't catch any of their names (not sure if they were mentioned). If you could fix the audio, it might make up for the bad lighting. One more thing - I think the "old footage" of the man with his deceased girlfriend goes a little too long. We get the point soon enough, I think it would work better if you shorten that section. Overall, I liked this short, despite the problems I mentioned. Again, not sure how relevant my feedback will be for a 2005 upload, but I hope this is helpful. read
-
A review of Act Your Ageby nycdi on 05/12/2009Oh dear. I thought the idea as expressed in the logline seemed promising. However, it falls apart pretty quickly. I'm not sure where to begin. I was wondering just how old the writer is, because the situations, characters, and dialogue just seem so immature or inexperienced. For example, you tried to paint the makeup artist job that Hayley has as demeaning drudgery. Yet,... Oh dear. I thought the idea as expressed in the logline seemed promising. However, it falls apart pretty quickly. I'm not sure where to begin. I was wondering just how old the writer is, because the situations, characters, and dialogue just seem so immature or inexperienced.
For example, you tried to paint the makeup artist job that Hayley has as demeaning drudgery. Yet, are you aware of how coveted such a career truly is? There are people out there who try hard to break into the film industry as makeup artists. They are respected and usually paid fairly well.
Which leads me to the notion that Cary is alone responsible for supporting them both is just plain antiquated. She works. It's sickening when Hayley says she needs a husband to buy her a nice house. It's also a very immature stance that Hayley is upset when Cary doesn't go and "stand up for her" when a guy bumps into her. So she fell over. First thing to do is help her up, not pick a fight. Mature, responsible adults don't go beating up people for things like that -- Keifer Sutherland a case in point. That notion is so "high school." And married couples are made of individuals, you know -- wives can and do go out with their friends just to socialize and not to get laid or cheat on their husbands. Again, the whole take on married life is quite immature.
The take on senior relationships is just as immature. For Tucker to say, "Old people dating? Do your dates just consist of going to the pharmacy and doctor's office together?" is just plain ridiculous (and the wording is clunky). Yes, even elderly people date, even elderly people have sex lives.
So you have sexist stereotypes, ageist stereotypes, and Italian mafia stereotypes (it is actually painful to read their dialogue). In addition, the whole notion that people could get away with wearing latex masks and not be detected is unrealistic. Especially when Dorian et al pay a visit -- they could never have gotten the masks on quickly enough for them to look real - these things normally take quite a while to put on, and require makeup to be blended in (makeup which would smear if touched). Not to mention how uncomfortable they would be to wear for hours at a time.
Also unrealistic is that they would go back to the home after finding the money. Just get the hell outta there and stop pretending. Then, Dorian takes them both to the morgue -- after his momma's body has been discovered. That broken lock would have been fixed immediately after they find her body.
Cary gets shot twice in the chest and survives? And Hayley giggles thinking about the gun exploding in his face?
All the scenes from courtroom on are unnecessary and anti-climactic.
It tries so hard to be a comedy but isn't really funny. It comes out as corny and unbelievable. I still think, however, that, the kernel of your original idea could work -- MAYBE -- if approached without all the stereotypes and immature viewpoint. I think both Hayley and Cary should be unemployed, struggling, and find a way to live in the home by using some kind of disguise, but not masks. But lose the notion that he alone has to be the provider. The story is ripe for some really good deception, but I found the idea of them hiding the body in the morgue rather distasteful. Maybe a male resident wants to go run off with a female resident (remember old people do have romances), and they know their families won't approve, so Cary offers to pretend they're still living there and moves himself and Hayley into their rooms, with some kind of disguise. Maybe have Cary the only one in disguise and Hayley pretends to be his daughter. A plot to murder one of the guests could work, but I think you should find another way, and rewrite the Dorian character.
I actually think that your idea is one of those movies that could be made. The way you've written it, however, makes it one of those movies that has an audience groaning or walking out.
I hope this is helpful in some way.
Oh, and watch your formatting for scene headings. read -
A review of The Seanceby nycdi on 03/15/2009So much potential - good setup, nice pacing, excellent camera and lighting work, but it just goes nowhere, really. This feels more like a teaser that would go in front of the titles in a longer film. So, while I enjoyed it, and wanted more, it is incomplete. If only there were even just a few more minutes where something, anything, happens! If the young guy had been more... So much potential - good setup, nice pacing, excellent camera and lighting work, but it just goes nowhere, really. This feels more like a teaser that would go in front of the titles in a longer film. So, while I enjoyed it, and wanted more, it is incomplete. If only there were even just a few more minutes where something, anything, happens! If the young guy had been more angry about his best friend getting his girlfriend preggers, which would be a more natural reaction, then he might have gone and done something in a rage, or somehow the spirit of Rosie enters him and he's stuck - you know, some kind of dilemma or funny circumstance was needed. In the end, this just kept us dangling. read
Write a Comment
Submissions by nycdi
No submissions (yet)
Reviews by nycdi 16
-
A review of Goodbyeby nycdi on 11/16/2009I've watched "Goodbye" and, though I see that it was uploaded in 2005, I have some feedback for you. The story is very good and feels complete. What happens too often with short films is either the script is inadequate and doesn't have enough going on, or the filmmaker tries to cram too much into a story which would've been better developed as a feature. This one was just... I've watched "Goodbye" and, though I see that it was uploaded in 2005, I have some feedback for you. The story is very good and feels complete. What happens too often with short films is either the script is inadequate and doesn't have enough going on, or the filmmaker tries to cram too much into a story which would've been better developed as a feature. This one was just right. The acting was also very good, natural, appropriate for the roles. My only contention is with certain elements of the production. The lighting was not optimal - too dark and muddy in most of it (but not all). But the audio is not good! It's so muffled that I can't understand most of what the characters are saying, especially when we see the guy sitting at a picnic bench with the new girlfriend - none of his voiceover is understandable. And I guess I didn't catch any of their names (not sure if they were mentioned). If you could fix the audio, it might make up for the bad lighting. One more thing - I think the "old footage" of the man with his deceased girlfriend goes a little too long. We get the point soon enough, I think it would work better if you shorten that section. Overall, I liked this short, despite the problems I mentioned. Again, not sure how relevant my feedback will be for a 2005 upload, but I hope this is helpful. read
-
A review of Act Your Ageby nycdi on 05/12/2009Oh dear. I thought the idea as expressed in the logline seemed promising. However, it falls apart pretty quickly. I'm not sure where to begin. I was wondering just how old the writer is, because the situations, characters, and dialogue just seem so immature or inexperienced. For example, you tried to paint the makeup artist job that Hayley has as demeaning drudgery. Yet,... Oh dear. I thought the idea as expressed in the logline seemed promising. However, it falls apart pretty quickly. I'm not sure where to begin. I was wondering just how old the writer is, because the situations, characters, and dialogue just seem so immature or inexperienced.
For example, you tried to paint the makeup artist job that Hayley has as demeaning drudgery. Yet, are you aware of how coveted such a career truly is? There are people out there who try hard to break into the film industry as makeup artists. They are respected and usually paid fairly well.
Which leads me to the notion that Cary is alone responsible for supporting them both is just plain antiquated. She works. It's sickening when Hayley says she needs a husband to buy her a nice house. It's also a very immature stance that Hayley is upset when Cary doesn't go and "stand up for her" when a guy bumps into her. So she fell over. First thing to do is help her up, not pick a fight. Mature, responsible adults don't go beating up people for things like that -- Keifer Sutherland a case in point. That notion is so "high school." And married couples are made of individuals, you know -- wives can and do go out with their friends just to socialize and not to get laid or cheat on their husbands. Again, the whole take on married life is quite immature.
The take on senior relationships is just as immature. For Tucker to say, "Old people dating? Do your dates just consist of going to the pharmacy and doctor's office together?" is just plain ridiculous (and the wording is clunky). Yes, even elderly people date, even elderly people have sex lives.
So you have sexist stereotypes, ageist stereotypes, and Italian mafia stereotypes (it is actually painful to read their dialogue). In addition, the whole notion that people could get away with wearing latex masks and not be detected is unrealistic. Especially when Dorian et al pay a visit -- they could never have gotten the masks on quickly enough for them to look real - these things normally take quite a while to put on, and require makeup to be blended in (makeup which would smear if touched). Not to mention how uncomfortable they would be to wear for hours at a time.
Also unrealistic is that they would go back to the home after finding the money. Just get the hell outta there and stop pretending. Then, Dorian takes them both to the morgue -- after his momma's body has been discovered. That broken lock would have been fixed immediately after they find her body.
Cary gets shot twice in the chest and survives? And Hayley giggles thinking about the gun exploding in his face?
All the scenes from courtroom on are unnecessary and anti-climactic.
It tries so hard to be a comedy but isn't really funny. It comes out as corny and unbelievable. I still think, however, that, the kernel of your original idea could work -- MAYBE -- if approached without all the stereotypes and immature viewpoint. I think both Hayley and Cary should be unemployed, struggling, and find a way to live in the home by using some kind of disguise, but not masks. But lose the notion that he alone has to be the provider. The story is ripe for some really good deception, but I found the idea of them hiding the body in the morgue rather distasteful. Maybe a male resident wants to go run off with a female resident (remember old people do have romances), and they know their families won't approve, so Cary offers to pretend they're still living there and moves himself and Hayley into their rooms, with some kind of disguise. Maybe have Cary the only one in disguise and Hayley pretends to be his daughter. A plot to murder one of the guests could work, but I think you should find another way, and rewrite the Dorian character.
I actually think that your idea is one of those movies that could be made. The way you've written it, however, makes it one of those movies that has an audience groaning or walking out.
I hope this is helpful in some way.
Oh, and watch your formatting for scene headings. read -
A review of The Seanceby nycdi on 03/15/2009So much potential - good setup, nice pacing, excellent camera and lighting work, but it just goes nowhere, really. This feels more like a teaser that would go in front of the titles in a longer film. So, while I enjoyed it, and wanted more, it is incomplete. If only there were even just a few more minutes where something, anything, happens! If the young guy had been more... So much potential - good setup, nice pacing, excellent camera and lighting work, but it just goes nowhere, really. This feels more like a teaser that would go in front of the titles in a longer film. So, while I enjoyed it, and wanted more, it is incomplete. If only there were even just a few more minutes where something, anything, happens! If the young guy had been more angry about his best friend getting his girlfriend preggers, which would be a more natural reaction, then he might have gone and done something in a rage, or somehow the spirit of Rosie enters him and he's stuck - you know, some kind of dilemma or funny circumstance was needed. In the end, this just kept us dangling. read
-
A review of Prius Envyby nycdi on 01/08/2008I loved it! Enjoyed it so much I watched it three times in a row. Oh, the moment when Tony turns to the camera and says, "I hate you, Andy" makes me laugh out loud each time I watch it! Tony's performance is so earnest and genuine, the first few minutes had me wondering if this was really just a video of two guys driving around with a camera looking for cars. It took... I loved it! Enjoyed it so much I watched it three times in a row. Oh, the moment when Tony turns to the camera and says, "I hate you, Andy" makes me laugh out loud each time I watch it!
Tony's performance is so earnest and genuine, the first few minutes had me wondering if this was really just a video of two guys driving around with a camera looking for cars. It took until about halfway through for it this inventive little nugget to sink in. Loved the song at the end, too! What a fun short!
Thanks! read -
A review of Parallel Dementiaby nycdi on 01/07/2008Oh, this is a hoot. I thought it quite entertaining. Costumes and set were well done! Actors were very good. It needs an opening title and credits though. The B&W section dragged on a bit too long, and the pacing needs to pick up overall - but it was really cute, creative, and quite funny! Made me laugh out loud - I enjoyed it.
-
A review of Beyond The Swing: Michael Andrewby nycdi on 01/06/2008This could have been a fun and interesting documentary. Unfortunately, it didn't deliver. There was no intro, no organization to the story, no humor. It was basically a talking head from beginning to end, with B-roll footage popping in every few seconds. The editing seemed to be an experimental conglomeration of tricks - "Oh, looky what my editing software can do!" It... This could have been a fun and interesting documentary. Unfortunately, it didn't deliver. There was no intro, no organization to the story, no humor. It was basically a talking head from beginning to end, with B-roll footage popping in every few seconds. The editing seemed to be an experimental conglomeration of tricks - "Oh, looky what my editing software can do!"
It would've benefited from having some kind of teaser in the beginning - perhaps backstage preparations before a show - followed by legible credits and background info on this performer given not just by himself, but also people who know him, work with him, fans, family, etc., and culminating into a live performance by the singer -- shot by the filmmaker, rather than shown in clips provided by the performer. It should have had some kind of story arc - it lacked a beginning, middle, and end. It needs, perhaps, to answer a question, or show a man setting out to achieve a goal, or something... anything!
The titles were too small and the font hard to read. I think that this singer could make a provocative and stimulating subject for a documentary; had the filmmaker written a treatment or outline beforehand, perhaps doing so would've helped bring a focus to the project and served to actually create a story that went somewhere. This filmmaker seems to have good instincts but needs more thought and focus to go into adding body and weight to their ideas. read -
A review of Stinking Cigarby nycdi on 01/06/2008Starting with the positives, I'll say the cinematography and lighting are very nicely done. The production values seem fairly high for a short - for the most part. I'm not sure if I like much else about it, and I'll try to explain why. The story kind of goes nowhere, and isn't nearly as dramatic or insightful as the loglines led me to believe. There needs to be more of... Starting with the positives, I'll say the cinematography and lighting are very nicely done. The production values seem fairly high for a short - for the most part.
I'm not sure if I like much else about it, and I'll try to explain why. The story kind of goes nowhere, and isn't nearly as dramatic or insightful as the loglines led me to believe. There needs to be more of a conflict, other than what her thoughts were telling us -- mostly because there is not much in the movie to support her "claims" that her mother is irresponsible, "barely notices her," and is a loser. She arrives home to a clean and tidy house where she has her own room, and her mother cheerily says "Bye, sweetie, I love you" before she leaves for dinner with her boyfriend. Both her mother and her mother's boyfriend are clean and well-groomed, and appear quite benign and wholesome. The cold pizza isn't enough to imply that she doesn't care about her daughter, which made me think that all of Jenny's complaints are simply the exaggerations of a spoiled brat, probably just because she wishes things were different and her father was still at home.
If the goal was to show how an irresponsible parent has created a disillusioned young girl forced to grow up too soon, the story might've benefited from having some of her friends in the playground with her, to react to her situation or show some contrast between their lives and hers. The mother's boyfriend should have been a more sinister and threatening presence. All we have to go on are Jenny's thoughts. In addition, if the mother was so irresponsible and uncaring, why would Jenny smoking a cigar bother her that much? Obviously, it's a fantasy of Jenny's that it would get her mother's attention, but since she went directly to her room and didn't taunt her mother with the smell of tobacco all over her, it didn't work very well as a device. Furthermore, Jenny's furtive looking around in the park to make sure no one saw her pick up that cigar butt was inconsistent with a rebellious teenager who starts off the movie saying "Fuck school!"
Regarding Jenny's lines, which we hear in voiceover, they didn't seem realistic to me. I doubt very much that a girl of about 14 would use phrases like "string of losers," "booze and smokes," "a mere wishful dream," or "same trick pony."
Technically, some of the sounds intrude on a very quiet background and result in a bit of a jarring effect, such as the birds chirping in the park. There should have been more ambient noise behind those moments, or the volume lowered on the chirps.
The titles need to be fixed. The first thing I noticed when the movie began is the incorrect use of the article "a" in the opening credits. They should have been "An Eternal Rainbows Production" - not "A Eternal..." and "An Arun Vaidyanathan Film" - not "A Arun..." (actually, I think "A Film by Arun Vaidyanathan" would be better). That may seem of picayune importance, but with a grammatical error being the first thing I saw, I braced myself for a low-quality movie and wondered if it might be a student film. Not a good first impression, especially since the production values were not crappy at all. On the same note, it looks as if your young star's first name is misspelled in the end credits, if I am to go by what was written in the production notes. read -
A review of White Rabbitby nycdi on 12/28/2007Well, White Rabbit has quite a lot going for it. The characters are, for the most part, very likeable and the story did draw me in. There is some funny and believable dialogue, and I wanted to know what was going to happen. I basically like the premise. However, there are some areas that need addressing. Basically, I'm going to address my comments directly to the writer..... Well, White Rabbit has quite a lot going for it. The characters are, for the most part, very likeable and the story did draw me in. There is some funny and believable dialogue, and I wanted to know what was going to happen. I basically like the premise. However, there are some areas that need addressing.
Basically, I'm going to address my comments directly to the writer...
As a woman, I must say that the women and girls are not as fully fleshed out as the men and boys. You teeter on the edge of stereotype now and then. I didn't find much to like about the character of Sally. I don't think you meant to write an unlikeable character, but you fell into the trap of writing an assertive, ambitious business woman as a cold-hearted bitch, and that comes off as a little bit of a cop-out. In addition, that side of her and the way she liked dressing her son in nerdy suits, didn't quite jive with the idea that she's a former hippie into yoga and tofu. She was really the only character I took exception with - I really liked how you wrote all the rest.
The storyline does veer off into different directions at times. I understand that there are about six or so characters, each with their own little plots -- but sometimes we are carried a little too far off in one direction and it takes too long to get back. The pace slows down quite a bit after Jack buys the truck - the fishing trip needs to happen much sooner than it does! And some scenes don't serve the story very well - for example, I don't think you need the family bowling excursion at all. I also didn't really see any need for the rabbit getting killed and the subsequent funeral, either (therefore, the title wouldn't be relevant, I guess, but I am not crazy about it anyway). I'm also not sure about Jack giving Adam acid or having a family in Vegas. The main story line gets blurred a little too often.
I think it would benefit you to really hone in on the essence of what your main characters (Adam and Jack) WANT, how they intend to get what they want, and then make sure that all the other characters and circumstances serve the story as either obstacles or allies - every action and every line uttered by each character should be necessary and fulfill a purpose. Review your loglines and treatment as a guide; rewrite them if they are unclear.
There are also specific writing problems. First, I would say to keep in mind the old adage, "Show, don't tell." I jotted down some examples from your screenplay with which you basically tell the reader what a character is feeling, rather than showing. And you can't tell the audience what a character is feeling or thinking unless you have voiceover, and you don't want to do that, so you need to address this in such a way that the characters' ACTIONS let us know how they feel. Here are the examples:
On page 40, there is a kitchen scene with Jack and Sally. First of all, I think it should end when Jack leaves the room - you don't need Sally calling after him after he leaves. It's stronger without it. But secondly, after Jack tells Sally she's not Adam's mother, you wrote:
Jack walks out of the kitchen casually, leaving Sally steaming.
Okay, keeping in mind that the screenplay is a blueprint for what we see on the screen, how does the audience know Sally is steaming? Is there actually steam rising from her head? I hope I don't come off as flippant by asking that, but I only mean to illustrate my point. Your sentence would absolutely work in a novel, but not in a screenplay. If I wrote that action line, it would probably be something like:
Jack leaves the room. Sally blinks and swallows hard. Her jaw clenches.
End that scene right there. But be careful with your action lines - you have far too many of them and they are not as necessary as you think. Look at pages 36-38 - you have "Billy shrugs... Billy nods... Billy giggles... Billy nods... Billy nods... Billy shrugs... Billy looks confused..." in between almost every one of Jack's lines! It's not your job to direct the actor on every page. If the director wants Billy to nod, she or he will tell him - you don't need to interject that kind of action throughout so many pages. Too many action lines (and too much dialogue) can muddy a story.
I think you get the idea - here are some more examples where you told us what your character was feeling rather than letting their actions reveal it:
Pg. 2: Adam is no longer listening. He watches Sally's lips move but can hear nothing.
(ask yourself - how does the audience know he is not listening?)
Pg. 35: The end of the game approaches.
(how does the audience see the game is almost over? Is Adam looking at the scorecard? Is the winning team high-fiving each other?)
Pg. 39: Adam says to Sally, "I just want to do some fishing."
(why not show him running around, excitedly packing up his gear and getting his clothes ready without having him SAY he wants to go? Show us, don't tell)
Pg. 73: Silence as Adam's anger builds up inside.
(again, what do we SEE that lets us know he is getting angrier by the moment?)
All these on Pg. 90:
Adam looks fed up with Jack.
Sally looks deep in thought.
To Adam, the armchair seems incredibly daunting.
(you know what I'm going to say - how will the audience SEE or KNOW what the characters are feeling?)
You have this sort of thing running throughout the whole screenplay. As an exercise, you might save a new version and try taking out ALL the action lines. Read it through without them and only insert what you ABSOLUTELY need. And then be careful to SHOW the audience the characters' inner lives by what they DO (mostly) and what they say. Minimize the dialogue, too, to just the essential. Screenplays ideally should have lots of white space in them. Always ask yourself what the audience will see on the screen.
Other than that, go through it with a fine tooth comb and look for typos and punctuation errors (there are a few), but most especially watch the verbs - the action lines should all have verbs in the active tense, not the passive tense. For example, on pg. 94, you have:
Adam calls out to Jack who is seated in his truck behind the wheel, trying to start the engine.
. . . . .ADAM
. . . . .Jack!
The truck shoots off with a very drunk Jack behind the wheel.
So, how do we know Jack is drunk? You told us in a previous scene, but that again was not *showing* us. How do we show what Jack is doing in the truck without using an overly complex sentence? Be on the lookout for verbs that end in "ing" and cut them out! I would have this scene go something like this (note the active verbs):
Jack climbs into the truck. He tosses an empty whiskey bottle out the window and turns the key. The engine revs. Adam races to the driveway. The truck lurches, then pulls away.
. . . . .ADAM
. . . . .Jack!
Hopefully you can see how that accomplished what you wanted in a more succinct, direct, and active way.
I know I went on and on with my review/critique, but I truly hope I've been helpful to you. It just needs some tightening it up and corrections of style and formatting problems. I do like the basics of the story and I really feel there is a good premise here, and relationship between Jack and Adam is quite compelling. I would want to see this one, so go for it! read
Comments About nycdi 10
-
heat_wave187 on 03/02/2010
nycdi wrote:heat_wave187 wrote:thanks, you rock...
No, you rock! :)
you need, you call, i answer... i do not forget this... -
heat_wave187 on 03/01/2010
thanks, you rock... -
Paul Iacono on 02/17/2010
Hey, thanks so much for your excellent and helpful suggestions on my logline.
Not sure why the thread turned into a snipefest... that seems to happen a lot when I post, so I have to assume it's my fault, but I'm damned if I can figure out what I said that pisses people off so.
Anyway... again, thank you.
pi -
bthielke on 02/17/2010
heck, I got that one in my favorites folder on my computer already! he he he.
Thanks for having a little fun with it, needed that today, thanks! -
**DELETED ACCOUNT** on 11/17/2009
Comment deleted by nycdi -
vanfilm09 on 10/23/2009
Clearly we get the same kind of joke not that I think that makes us the "lowest" or in the least bit "common" LOL -
**DELETED ACCOUNT** on 06/28/2009
Thanks for reading and reviewing SLEEPY EYE. I appreciate your time and effort, and also your opinion. Have a great day! Tom -
**DELETED ACCOUNT** on 06/17/2009
Appreciate the review. Sorry about all the errors I thought I went back and fixed all the scripts that I've written, guess I missed one. I wrote this back in '05 and never went back to it but with all the good feedback I might go back in and try to make something of it. -
**DELETED ACCOUNT** on 05/12/2009
Comment deleted by nycdi -
Redleg on 03/23/2009
Thanks for the excellent review. You hit on some things that I was too close to it to see. One of the things I appreciate is that you actually researched the real Lilith. I didn't originally (the first write) but decided to on this one. ( I did take a liberty or two, though her familiar - the owl - is real.) There is a lot in her history that could be used, like the name "Liath", that I really like and can easily work in. Eastern plains was meant to be in North America, either US or Canada. There were a lot of Brit and Scot immigrants at the time in that area. I was shooting more for the class separation, but I work it clearer.
All in all, you were a great help. Glad you liked it, and I'm already working on strengthening the story.
Thank again!
Ed
Write a Comment
Browse:
Copyright © 2001-2013 Trigger Street Labs. All Rights Reserved.
Comments About nycdi 10
-
Quote
nycdi wrote:
heat_wave187 wrote:
thanks, you rock...
-
Quote
thanks, you rock...
-
Quote
Hey, thanks so much for your excellent and helpful suggestions on my logline.
+ more commentsheat_wave187 on 03/02/2010
No, you rock! :)
you need, you call, i answer... i do not forget this...
heat_wave187 on 03/01/2010
Paul Iacono on 02/17/2010
Not sure why the thread turned into a snipefest... that seems to happen a lot when I post, so I have to assume it's my fault, but I'm damned if I can figure out what I said that pisses people off so.
Anyway... again, thank you.
pi