An uptight policeman struggles to solve a murder while falling for his new partner, the Chief’s wild niece.
OliRichards
I write for a living, but it's not nearly as fun as writing screenplays, which I do in my spare time....
Bio
I write for a living, but it's not nearly as fun as writing screenplays, which I do in my spare time.
Submissions by OliRichards
-
a screenplay by OliRichards
-
a screenplay by OliRichards
A victim’s husband gets revenge when a detective’s mistake lets the killer off. What should the detective do?
Reviews by OliRichards 68
-
A review of Long Shotby OliRichards on 02/18/2012This is a very accomplished screenplay. The writing is very good, characters well developed, plot moves along nicely and it's a nice concept. The big question for me is, is it funny enough? I'm not sure. There's some good comedy in there, but I think you need more - it's just not packed enough with laughs yet. There's plenty of potential to do this - the dwarfs, Scott... This is a very accomplished screenplay. The writing is very good, characters well developed, plot moves along nicely and it's a nice concept.
The big question for me is, is it funny enough? I'm not sure. There's some good comedy in there, but I think you need more - it's just not packed enough with laughs yet. There's plenty of potential to do this - the dwarfs, Scott being uptight, Emily being uptight, Scott and Emily fancying each other without realizing and so on. Make the most of them.
I only had a couple of specific comments:
p.60 - 63
the turnaround from Emily telling Bill she hates him going into the theatre to admitting she is wrong soon after she came out is too quick without a strong reason for the change. It needs more of a trigger for her change to happen.
p.96
It is odd that her dad turned around so quickly - I think there needs to be a better reason for this as well.
Overall though, great writing, good luck with it. read -
A review of Ah-Haby OliRichards on 02/18/2012I like the premise of this movie - a gang that steal a lot of money, get robbed in turn, and then have to try and get it in order to return it to avoid worse trouble. It's a great plot and one that you could have a lot of fun with. Regarding the characters, I thought the main ones all spoke with too similtar voices. When I covered over the name and just read the speech I... I like the premise of this movie - a gang that steal a lot of money, get robbed in turn, and then have to try and get it in order to return it to avoid worse trouble. It's a great plot and one that you could have a lot of fun with.
Regarding the characters, I thought the main ones all spoke with too similtar voices. When I covered over the name and just read the speech I couldn't work out which characters were speaking.
The comedy wasn't that funny for me, but maybe that's just a different sense of humour.
I thought there was too much speech in some places. I would really have liked to have less talk and more plot twists and turns instead. It is the plot that makes this movie and you could make more out of it.
I think you could have made more of the relationship between Sonya and Profit. Sonya is clearly a strong character but plays only a bit part at the moment. It's a B plot that could be funny and interesting.
These were my thoughts, good luck with it. read -
A review of The Resurrection of Skippy Poindexterby OliRichards on 02/17/2012Hmmm, not sure what to make of this. It's clearly very well written, and there is a strong grasp of plot, character and pace. It just, well, didn't grab me. I think because it's a comedy but it didn't make me laugh very much. There were some good lines, but it wasn't out and out funny. The twists at the end came thick and fast and I didn't expect them, so that was good... Hmmm, not sure what to make of this. It's clearly very well written, and there is a strong grasp of plot, character and pace. It just, well, didn't grab me. I think because it's a comedy but it didn't make me laugh very much. There were some good lines, but it wasn't out and out funny.
The twists at the end came thick and fast and I didn't expect them, so that was good. I thought there would be a more moral aspect, a point to the whole movie. Perhaps this is too obvious and has been done too much, but not having one left me feeling a little underwhelmed - perhaps that's me because I've seen so many of this type of movie and they tend to have a message.
It was too long, you could easily lose 20 pages without missing anything, making it sharper and more focused. In particular the no. of flashbacks were too many. I got the point of them and liked the plot device, but thought it was a bit overdone.
A key plot weakness for me was with Splitfoot. As he was the all-powerful devil it wasn't realistic that Skippy could have caused his downfall, Splitfoot could have saved himself with magic.
Overall I guess I've seen these types of movies and didn't find this one bought anything different enough or funny enough to make it stand out.
My suggestion, and you probably don't want to do it as it will involve changing the whole movie, is to have Splitfoot as a human being. He's so rich and powerful he's bored, his only fun is in toying with people's lives. Skippy is his next victim, who he takes, makes famous again, ridicules etc, but when he tries to discard him Skippy is the one who gets away and gets revenge - so same movie but without the supernatural. Just an idea.
I know this has been pretty negative but as I said at the beginning, you clearly write very well and have a good grasp of screenwriting structures and plots. Good luck. read
Write a Comment
Submissions by OliRichards
-
a screenplay by OliRichards
An uptight policeman struggles to solve a murder while falling for his new partner, the Chief’s wild niece.
-
a screenplay by OliRichards
A victim’s husband gets revenge when a detective’s mistake lets the killer off. What should the detective do?
Reviews by OliRichards 68
-
A review of Long Shotby OliRichards on 02/18/2012This is a very accomplished screenplay. The writing is very good, characters well developed, plot moves along nicely and it's a nice concept. The big question for me is, is it funny enough? I'm not sure. There's some good comedy in there, but I think you need more - it's just not packed enough with laughs yet. There's plenty of potential to do this - the dwarfs, Scott... This is a very accomplished screenplay. The writing is very good, characters well developed, plot moves along nicely and it's a nice concept.
The big question for me is, is it funny enough? I'm not sure. There's some good comedy in there, but I think you need more - it's just not packed enough with laughs yet. There's plenty of potential to do this - the dwarfs, Scott being uptight, Emily being uptight, Scott and Emily fancying each other without realizing and so on. Make the most of them.
I only had a couple of specific comments:
p.60 - 63
the turnaround from Emily telling Bill she hates him going into the theatre to admitting she is wrong soon after she came out is too quick without a strong reason for the change. It needs more of a trigger for her change to happen.
p.96
It is odd that her dad turned around so quickly - I think there needs to be a better reason for this as well.
Overall though, great writing, good luck with it. read -
A review of Ah-Haby OliRichards on 02/18/2012I like the premise of this movie - a gang that steal a lot of money, get robbed in turn, and then have to try and get it in order to return it to avoid worse trouble. It's a great plot and one that you could have a lot of fun with. Regarding the characters, I thought the main ones all spoke with too similtar voices. When I covered over the name and just read the speech I... I like the premise of this movie - a gang that steal a lot of money, get robbed in turn, and then have to try and get it in order to return it to avoid worse trouble. It's a great plot and one that you could have a lot of fun with.
Regarding the characters, I thought the main ones all spoke with too similtar voices. When I covered over the name and just read the speech I couldn't work out which characters were speaking.
The comedy wasn't that funny for me, but maybe that's just a different sense of humour.
I thought there was too much speech in some places. I would really have liked to have less talk and more plot twists and turns instead. It is the plot that makes this movie and you could make more out of it.
I think you could have made more of the relationship between Sonya and Profit. Sonya is clearly a strong character but plays only a bit part at the moment. It's a B plot that could be funny and interesting.
These were my thoughts, good luck with it. read -
A review of The Resurrection of Skippy Poindexterby OliRichards on 02/17/2012Hmmm, not sure what to make of this. It's clearly very well written, and there is a strong grasp of plot, character and pace. It just, well, didn't grab me. I think because it's a comedy but it didn't make me laugh very much. There were some good lines, but it wasn't out and out funny. The twists at the end came thick and fast and I didn't expect them, so that was good... Hmmm, not sure what to make of this. It's clearly very well written, and there is a strong grasp of plot, character and pace. It just, well, didn't grab me. I think because it's a comedy but it didn't make me laugh very much. There were some good lines, but it wasn't out and out funny.
The twists at the end came thick and fast and I didn't expect them, so that was good. I thought there would be a more moral aspect, a point to the whole movie. Perhaps this is too obvious and has been done too much, but not having one left me feeling a little underwhelmed - perhaps that's me because I've seen so many of this type of movie and they tend to have a message.
It was too long, you could easily lose 20 pages without missing anything, making it sharper and more focused. In particular the no. of flashbacks were too many. I got the point of them and liked the plot device, but thought it was a bit overdone.
A key plot weakness for me was with Splitfoot. As he was the all-powerful devil it wasn't realistic that Skippy could have caused his downfall, Splitfoot could have saved himself with magic.
Overall I guess I've seen these types of movies and didn't find this one bought anything different enough or funny enough to make it stand out.
My suggestion, and you probably don't want to do it as it will involve changing the whole movie, is to have Splitfoot as a human being. He's so rich and powerful he's bored, his only fun is in toying with people's lives. Skippy is his next victim, who he takes, makes famous again, ridicules etc, but when he tries to discard him Skippy is the one who gets away and gets revenge - so same movie but without the supernatural. Just an idea.
I know this has been pretty negative but as I said at the beginning, you clearly write very well and have a good grasp of screenwriting structures and plots. Good luck. read -
A review of The False Flagby OliRichards on 12/19/2011For me this was both really good and really frustrating. First the good stuff – you can write, you can build tension, you can conjure up great action sequences, you can do realistic sounding dialogue, you can sustain a story over the length of a movie. All really great stuff. So why the frustration? There were a few things that I had a real problem with in this movie that... For me this was both really good and really frustrating. First the good stuff – you can write, you can build tension, you can conjure up great action sequences, you can do realistic sounding dialogue, you can sustain a story over the length of a movie. All really great stuff.
So why the frustration? There were a few things that I had a real problem with in this movie that meant I just didn’t think it would work. I’ll run through them in what I consider to be most important to least important:
- There is no way Sean would have been chosen for this mission. This is the biggest top secret mission ever. They would have chosen people not just on their physical prowess but on their psychological attributes too – which includes the ability to follow orders, lack of emotional connection to harming others and not sabotaging a mission. I just find it completely unrealistic he would have been chosen. And for them to have picked two dud people who go AWOL – no chance.
- Tied in with the first point. I didn’t find Sean was set up as a character well enough – one training run, then he joins a group in which everyone seems to hate him, and then the main event which he rebels on. We’d need a bit more story on the group, him becoming part of it, maybe one or two successful missions, him and Kitty perhaps chatting about how it’s getting all too much as Duke seems happy to kill anyone in his path, women and children included etc etc. In other words build up to him going off mission and make it a proper story.
- Why on earth did Duke not order Jugs to execute Sean on p.47? Maybe I missed something but it seems incredible he didn’t.
- The shoot out that Sean and especially Kitty engage in at the end is way over the top. Rambo ridiculous in the number of people they kill and the number of bullets that happen to miss.
- Why did they put make-up on themselves? I know it’s meant to be top secret but their cover could have been blown by a security guard spotting they had a silly outfit on. Surely there would have been a process in place to ensure the disguises were perfect.
- Kitty hiding in the mattress – really neat idea, but she wouldn’t have been able to replace the sheets.
I think your main difficulty is that these kinds of movies have reached a high level of sophistication. Films like the Bourne series and MI series have the same great level of action you do, but better back stories, plots and conversation between highly clever people engaging in battles of wits rather than the swearing and cheap jibes that you write. That sounds incredibly negative and it’s not meant to be. You’re a very good writer, it’s just that the good movies out there in this genre, which I really like, have great writing. I think you could get there though. Good luck! read -
A review of Southern Hospitality (Cherry Poppin' rev)by OliRichards on 11/30/2011I liked this a lot. It was action packed, full of twists, had a satisfying conclusion and flowed smoothly. The main drawback for me was that it felt like a movie that had already been made many times over - the groups of gangsters all chasing after money and all getting shot at the end except for the hero who escapes. So low on originality. Having said that, I'm sure there... I liked this a lot. It was action packed, full of twists, had a satisfying conclusion and flowed smoothly. The main drawback for me was that it felt like a movie that had already been made many times over - the groups of gangsters all chasing after money and all getting shot at the end except for the hero who escapes. So low on originality. Having said that, I'm sure there is a huge fan base for this kind of movie that would easily gobble up another well written script in the genre.
In order to turn this into something that really stands out, even within the genre, I felt it needed some more comedy. For example I really loved the dialogue on p.87 where the two bad guys go totally over the top in insulting each other. It was funny while being true to the movie and felt believable. I also really liked the way Bobby gets more and more injured, really funny. I felt both could have been made more of, and that there would need to be this kind of comedy running all the way through it. I'm not saying you have to have as heavy a comedy focus as, say, lock, stock and two smoking barrels, but I think it needs a bit more.
Overall though, well written and accomplished, well done. read -
A review of The Senatorby OliRichards on 11/29/2011I thought this was a good attempt at a politics satire. However I feel it still doesn't quite work as is, it needs some sharpening up. It's not satirical enough to be a proper satire, yet it's too satirical to be a straight work. If you’re going for satire then I feel you’ve got to go more for out and out comedy. There were some great bits, such as when the senator got... I thought this was a good attempt at a politics satire. However I feel it still doesn't quite work as is, it needs some sharpening up. It's not satirical enough to be a proper satire, yet it's too satirical to be a straight work.
If you’re going for satire then I feel you’ve got to go more for out and out comedy. There were some great bits, such as when the senator got caught in the toilet with a guy, or Mikael mistakenly being thought of as Spanish, but they were relatively few and far between. As such it didn’t feel like a proper satire, but rather a straight movie with some really odd bits to it.
Alternatively I think you could play it straight and still have a good movie. A republican Senator harbouring a secret that he’s gay, combined with funding from a really rich Reverend who’s pushing anti-gay legislation – that makes for a great plot.
On the specifics.
You only need to write what people see on screen, the rest is unnecessary. To give you a few examples of
p.14 - Yes, Faith's boyfriend is, In fact, a Muslim.
p.16 - Basically serving herself up on a silver platter.
These aren’t needed.
p.53
It is very far-fetched, even for a satire, that he would rush out looking for David as it would be bound to cause media interest and they would likely find him, so it’s a career ending move. I’d have him slipping out quietly.
p.73
‘In the time we have been talking, I've acquired another five percent of your gross national
product.’
Guess this is just about ok for satire, but it’s so far from realistic I’d tone it down slightly.
p.86
If David could find out all that dodgy stuff in a few days, then the media would have definitely found out, and it would have been in the media and common knowledge a long time ago. Even satire has to conform to rules of story-telling and audiences don’t like to feel sold short. This felt a bit too easy and lazy, I’d work on this aspect of the story.
So overall definitely potential, I think you’ve got a great core idea, and with work it could be great. read -
A review of Jigsaw (revisited)by OliRichards on 11/28/2011Overall this has a great set-up which doesn’t deliver for me. More needed to be made of Nehemiah’s background and why he was doing what he was doing (for example he killed his daughter accidentally and Raymond told him he was going to kill his own daughter, which leads to Nehemiah thinking that in some strange way saving Raymond’s daughter would atone for his murder). At... Overall this has a great set-up which doesn’t deliver for me. More needed to be made of Nehemiah’s background and why he was doing what he was doing (for example he killed his daughter accidentally and Raymond told him he was going to kill his own daughter, which leads to Nehemiah thinking that in some strange way saving Raymond’s daughter would atone for his murder). At the moment I don’t really buy his motives.
I also don’t buy Raymond’s motive – why does he want to kill his daughter. Maybe I missed it but if it’s just because he’s a psycho I’m not sure that’s strong enough.
While the twist was a good one, it didn’t seem big enough for me to warrant the whole screenplay revolving around that one twist.
On the plus side I like the Becky/Wiley dynamic and the writing is smooth and the language lifelike. .
As the main characters don’t appear to have strong motives, I failed to get into the screenplay. Feel free to ignore, but I think a stronger core theme would be something like Nehemiah returning home to seek forgiveness from his daughter, Raymond turns up all charming but kills people, and people think it’s Nehemiah. Then you have a set-up where the audience know one thing, the characters another, and you can really play on that.
If you don’t fancy going down that route then I’d cut it down 20 pages (for example when Nehemiah first comes into town it’s very slow moving), work on the motivations of the central characters and get the action moving more quickly.
There were a few typos (such as on p.92 when you use Becky instead of Wiley) so a quick check all the way through would be good. Also there are a few places where you write things that can’t be shown on screen, such as on p.58 when you write ‘Wiley falls apart’ or on p.97 when you write ‘He’s lost in his shattered world’. It’s better to write out the actions which lead the audience to pick up on the emotions rather than the other way round.
Sorry not to be more positive. I think it does have potential and you are clearly a good writer, it needs a bit more working on. read -
A review of HUMANIMAL (2nd rev)by OliRichards on 10/01/2011I really liked this. I thought it was well written, funny and smooth. The formatting was spot on and the pace was great. It is one of the best things I've read on here. I normally have quite a bit to say but I haven't this time as it was so good. However I'll answer your questions. The quick reveal worked for me, as the script was strong enough not to rely on the mystery... I really liked this. I thought it was well written, funny and smooth. The formatting was spot on and the pace was great. It is one of the best things I've read on here. I normally have quite a bit to say but I haven't this time as it was so good. However I'll answer your questions.
The quick reveal worked for me, as the script was strong enough not to rely on the mystery of the humanimal to carry it. However, having read your suggestion, the slow reveal I think could work well, though I wouldn't build the script around it.
I like the mix of genres, but for me it's a dark romantic comedy, and I'd ensure it stays as that and not lose people through out and out gore - have it over the top comic gore.
For suggestions how to cut it down, I thought the end was a little long and could have been shortened. For me the climactic scene felt to be on p.81, the rest is wind down. I'd cut down after that. I'd take out p.86-88 - I thought that Oval would crumble at the first bullet.
Third act - as I say, it seemed like a very long wind down.
BDSM - I liked it. I'd definitely keep it in.
Supernatural G-spot - I don't think you need this. There's enough going on already and adding this other element may only confuse things.
Good luck with it, well done. read -
A review of Big Gameby OliRichards on 10/01/2011I liked this movie. There's always something fun (maybe it's just me) in stories where humans are playing games for their life. There were twists and turns and multiple sub-plots to keep things interesting. I got a little lost at times with all the characters and each one's motive, and felt I didn't get to explore any one character enough. I see three main stories - Wilson's,... I liked this movie. There's always something fun (maybe it's just me) in stories where humans are playing games for their life. There were twists and turns and multiple sub-plots to keep things interesting.
I got a little lost at times with all the characters and each one's motive, and felt I didn't get to explore any one character enough. I see three main stories - Wilson's, the people being hunted, and Charles et al. I wonder if that's too many for one movie, given that each story has a number of characters, and one story needs to be de-prioritised more in order to increase time with the other two and get more out of them.
I also don't think you need such a big build up at the beginning. It's more than half an hour before the 'game' gets going, I'd suggest half that. Or even start it at the beginning and fill in the back story as you go along.
I found the motives and goals of Charles confusing. And if he's killing other hunters who are important people surely their deaths would make big news? I like this twist, but I think it needs working out more clearly.
The script could do with a good edit. Also I'd look up spec scripts to ensure you're formatting correctly. For example, they don't have each scene numbered.
Overall a good script, but I think it needs a bit of work. read -
A review of Buzzby OliRichards on 09/22/2011I thought this was excellent. The pace was fast, the horror was shocking enough, the tension built up really well and there was a nice twist at the end. Here are the things that didn't quite work for me: It sometimes felt like the group were old friends, and sometimes like they hardly knew each other (such as the Tina and Rusty exchange on p.40/41). I guess this is because... I thought this was excellent. The pace was fast, the horror was shocking enough, the tension built up really well and there was a nice twist at the end.
Here are the things that didn't quite work for me:
It sometimes felt like the group were old friends, and sometimes like they hardly knew each other (such as the Tina and Rusty exchange on p.40/41). I guess this is because you're trying to give some back story to the characters, but it felt a little forced.
Patty and Dana immediately leaving the group when they have all arrived to go and camp is very odd, and it also didn't seem like they were part of the group. I wonder if they could've been picked up as hitchhikers on the way - makes it more plausible and could also add some comedy with the boys thinking they're picking up some hot girls but they're lesbians. You could still have them saying they'd stop by on the way back the following day.
p.62 Think you could make more of a joke out of Trevor being red with anger and then the Miwaukie Best - Trevor says something like it better not be Milwaukie Best and it is and everyone laughs as Trevor is too angry to speak.
p.93 I just can’t see Crystal and Trevor splitting up, or Trevor not taking a gun after what they’ve just been through. Didn't work for me.
Ranger Bob ending is a nice twist but I think it needs to be significantly worked on. They were rude to him so he not only kills them but invents super gruesome ways to do so - it seems to tenuous. You need to make Ranger Bob a lot more weird at the beginning, perhaps hint more strongly that the campsite wasn't full but Bob insists anyway (perhaps because they can see). Make it not just about the group of friends we follow, but that a few sets have gone missing so he's a proper psycho. Here's an idea - make Ranger Bob REALLY creepy. The gang think it's him. Then the family photo and diary gets found earlier - they think it's the son. Then the twist is it's actually Bob all along. Just an idea.
Feel free to ignore my suggestions. I've written quite a lot you could change, but I think it's all easily fixable and the hard stuff is all there - tension, pace, horror - so I rate this really high. read
Comments About OliRichards 28
-
rfryer on 02/20/2012
Thank you for your review of Ah-Ha. Your comments were carefully considered.. and you are right most of the characters do sound the same. Unfortunately, I only know how to write from one vein. I'll attempt to change up my style. -
lizzayn on 02/15/2012
Thanks for the review of Valkyrie. I found your notes helpful, especially about Nancy's income not really being of Muv's concern as much as her marriage prospects. I'll incorporate it into the rewrite. Thanks! -
SkylarX33 on 02/14/2012
Thanks for the review of School Board. I appreciate the suggestions. -
Laurence9 on 02/12/2012
Thanks Oli for your review of Primal Regime. I'll definitely consider adding some kind of safety device to Severn so that he may be more easily controlled or stopped. Very good point. :) -
DebraSwan on 02/08/2012
Thanks for taking the time to read Divine Intervention. Appreciate it.
Debra -
David Hayes on 12/20/2011
Yeah, thanks.
I was thinking the opening would still have to be tied in to Iran somehow and that they'd be setting off a bomb, which would kill their target and a few civilians. Sean might still do something heroic, like save a child or something. So that later, after seeing this op, you wouldn't question their qualifications, and Sean's betrayal would be more deeply felt by team. Maybe they'll say things like, "After all we've done you've suddenly grown a conscience?" Or "You can set off a bomb in Vienna (or wherever) but you can't do this?" Or something like that. Sorry. Just needed to think out loud. lol
Thanks again for your time and thoughts,
-D -
David Hayes on 12/19/2011
Hey, thanks so much for the review of FF. Can I ask a question? What would you think about Sean already being a member of this team & the opening sequence would be the team in action doing a real FF? And perhaps we'd see Sean do something morally questionable, which would make no one doubt he's right for the Mall op? And then there would be a contradiction in his personality in that he could do something questionable oversees but moral at home? I just fear that might undermine sympathy.
Thanks so much for your time.
-D -
Revale on 11/17/2011
I posted a script a while back that needed work. After 10 reviews, I deleted it so I could do revisions as someone warned me the old one will keep getting assigned. Will probably put it back up again when I'm done. It's strange that it shows no submissions yet when you delete one. It also removes all the reviews done on it from the reviewer's page and all comments. Wish I'd known that ahead of time.
LOL. There's a writer on here that has done over a hundred reviews and nearly a thousand posts on the forums but has never submitted a script. -
Revale on 11/15/2011
Hi, I remember doing a review of Beyond Doubt a couple of months ago and enjoying it very much. I just did one of hywelberry's and saw where he had reviewed Beyond doubt too. I used some of his comments about your script in my review and thought you might get a kick out of reading it. -
Anthony J. on 09/19/2011
Thanks again.
Write a Comment
Browse:
Copyright © 2001-2013 Trigger Street Labs. All Rights Reserved.
Comments About OliRichards 28
-
Quote
Thank you for your review of Ah-Ha. Your comments were carefully considered.. and you are right most of the characters do sound the same. Unfortunately, I only know how to write from one vein. I'll attempt to change up my style.
-
Quote
Thanks for the review of Valkyrie. I found your notes helpful, especially about Nancy's income not really being of Muv's concern as much as her marriage prospects. I'll incorporate it into the rewrite. Thanks!
-
Quote
Thanks for the review of School Board. I appreciate the suggestions.
+ more commentsrfryer on 02/20/2012
lizzayn on 02/15/2012
SkylarX33 on 02/14/2012